e10vk
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008
Commission File Number 000-49602
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
77-0118518 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3120 Scott Blvd., Ste 130 |
|
|
Santa Clara, California
|
|
95054 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(408) 454-5100
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
The Nasdaq Global Select Market |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
The Nasdaq Global Select Market |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule
405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form
10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant (16,968,891
shares), based on the closing price of the registrants Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market on December 28, 2007 of $41.19, was $698,948,620. For purposes of this
computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant are deemed to be
affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such officers,
directors, or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.
As of August 15, 2008, there were outstanding 22,457,631 shares of the registrants Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share.
The share quantities and the share price noted above do not reflect the retroactive effect of
the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend to each stockholder of record on August
15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The statements contained in this report on Form 10-K that are not purely historical are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Forward-looking
statements include statements regarding our expectations, anticipation, intentions,
beliefs, or strategies regarding the future, whether or not those words are used.
Forward-looking statements also include statements regarding revenue, margins, expenses, and
earnings analysis for fiscal 2009 and thereafter; technological innovations; products or product
development, including their performance, market position, and potential; our product development
strategies; potential acquisitions or strategic alliances; the success of particular product or
marketing programs; the amounts of revenue generated as a result of sales to significant customers;
and liquidity and anticipated cash needs and availability. All forward-looking statements included
in this report are based on information available to us as of the filing date of this report, and
we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Our actual results could
differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially are the factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
- i -
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are a leading worldwide developer and supplier of custom-designed human interface solutions
that enable people to interact more easily and intuitively with a wide variety of mobile computing,
communications, entertainment, and other electronic devices. We currently target the personal
computer, or PC, market and the market for digital lifestyle products, including mobile smartphones
and feature phones, portable digital music and video players, and other select electronic device
markets with our customized human interface solutions.
We are a market leader in providing human interface solutions to our target markets. Our
original equipment manufacturer, or OEM, customers include most of the tier one PC OEMs and many of
the worlds largest OEMs for mobile smartphones and feature phones and portable digital music
players. We generally supply custom designed human interface solutions to our OEM customers
through their contract manufacturers, which take delivery of our products and pay us directly for
them. Through our new OneTouch offering, we now offer not only our custom module solutions but
also enable our customers to access our technologies to develop their own human interface designs
for capacitive buttons and scrolling applications for products such as mobile smartphones and
feature phones, portable digital music and video players, and notebook peripherals.
Our website is www.synaptics.com. Through our website, we make available free of
charge all of our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our annual reports on Form
10-K, our proxy statements, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K
as well as Form 3, Form 4, and Form 5 Reports for our directors, officers, and principal
stockholders, together with amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a), 15(d), or 16 under the Securities Exchange Act. These reports are available immediately
after their electronic filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The website also
includes corporate governance information, including our Code of Conduct, our Code of Ethics for
the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, and our Board Committee Charters.
PC Market
We provide custom human interface solutions for navigation, cursor control, and multimedia
controls for many of the worlds premier PC OEMs. In addition to notebooks, other PC applications
for our technology include peripherals, such as keyboards, mice, and monitors, as well as desktop
and PC remote control applications. Our solutions for the PC market include the TouchPad, a
touch-sensitive pad that senses the position and movement of a persons finger on its surface; the
TouchStyk, a self contained, easily integrated pointing stick module; and dual pointing solutions,
which combine both a TouchPad and a pointing stick into a single notebook computer, enabling users
to use the interface of their choice.
The latest industry projections for notebook unit growth for the period 2008-2012 show a
compound annual growth rate of 18.1% compared with 3.6% for desktop computers, reflecting the
continued migration of desktops to notebooks fueled by users desire for mobile computing and
on-the-go access to applications, information, and digital content, which is expanding on a daily
basis. Based on the strength of our technology and engineering know-how, we believe we are well
positioned to take advantage of the growth opportunity in the notebook market and to provide
innovative, value-added human interface solutions for each of the key end-user preferences. We
estimate that in our fiscal 2008 approximately 88% of all notebook computers sold used solely a
touch pad interface; 2% used solely a pointing stick interface; and 10% used a dual pointing
interface, which consists of both a touch pad and a pointing stick. Our notebook product lines of
touch pads and pointing sticks allow us to address 100% of the notebook market.
Digital Lifestyle Product Markets
We believe our intellectual property portfolio, our experience in providing human interface
solutions to major OEMs of electronic devices, and our proven track record of growth in our
expanding core notebook computer interface business position us to be a key technological enabler
for multiple consumer electronic devices targeted to meet the growing digital lifestyle trend.
Based on these strengths, we are addressing the opportunities created by the growth of mobile
computing, communications, and entertainment devices within the digital lifestyle products
1
markets. Digital lifestyle products include mobile smartphones and feature phones, portable
digital music and video players, remote controls, and GPS devices, as well as a variety of mobile,
handheld, wireless, and entertainment devices. Our array of human interface solutions for digital
lifestyle products include the ScrollStrip and TouchRing, which are scrolling solutions allowing
users to navigate efficiently through menus and content; LightTouch capacitive buttons, which
provide illuminated button functionality; and MobileTouch, NavPoint, and our ClearTouch solutions.
We believe our existing technologies, our range of product solutions, and our emphasis on ease of
use, small size, low power consumption, advanced functionality, durability, and reliability will
enable us to serve multiple aspects of the markets for digital lifestyle products and other
electronic devices.
We currently anticipate that our human interface solutions for mobile smartphones and feature
phones will constitute an increasing portion of our net revenue. Net revenue for our human
interface solutions for mobile smartphones and feature phones was not material until the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. Our success in serving the mobile smartphone market will depend upon the
continued growth of that portion of the overall mobile phone market, the utilization of
high-functionality interactive touch screens with easy-to-use touch button controls rather than
mechanical buttons as the human interface for application access and control in those products, our
ability to demonstrate to mobile smartphone OEMs, including those with which we have had no prior
relationship, the advantages of our human interface solutions in terms of performance, size,
durability, power consumption, and industrial design possibilities, and the success of OEMs
products utilizing our human interface solutions.
Industry projections for the mobile phone market for the period 2008-2011 show a compound
annual growth rate of 9% for the overall market and a compound annual growth rate of 48% for the
mobile smartphone and feature phone market, reflecting the trend towards increased interest among
non-business consumers and the trend towards greater functionality in smartphone products to meet
and address the expanded needs and expectations of the consumer oriented market.
Industry projections for the portable digital music player market for the period 2008-2011
suggest that the market is declining at an annual rate of 1.6% for the overall market but growing
at a compound annual rate of 47% for video capable MP3 players, reflecting the trend towards
portable digital entertainment devices with advanced capabilities, such as built-in video playback
capabilities. These products require a simple, durable, and intuitive human interface solution to
enable the user to navigate efficiently through menus and scroll through extensive play lists,
songs, and videos contained in the host device. We believe we are well positioned to take
advantage of this growing market based on our technology, engineering know-how, and the acceptance
of our human interface solutions by OEMs in this market.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to continue to enhance our position as a leading supplier of human interface
solutions for the PC market and for the markets for digital lifestyle products. Key aspects of our
strategy to achieve this objective include those set forth below.
Extend Our Technological Leadership
We plan to utilize our extensive intellectual property portfolio and technological expertise
to extend the functionality of our product solutions and offer innovative product solutions to
customers across multiple markets. We intend to continue utilizing our technological expertise to
reduce the overall size, weight, cost, and power consumption of our human interface solutions while
increasing their applications, capabilities, and performance. We plan to continue enhancing the
ease of use and functionality of our solutions. We also plan to expand our research and
development efforts through increased investment in our engineering activities, the hiring of
additional engineering personnel, and strategic acquisitions and alliances. We believe that these
efforts will enable us to meet customer expectations and to achieve our goal of supplying on a
timely and cost-effective basis the most advanced, easy-to-use, functional human interface
solutions to our target markets.
Enhance Our Position in the PC Market
We intend to continue introducing market-leading human interface solutions in terms of
performance, functionality, size, and ease of use. We plan to continue enhancing our customers
industrial design alternatives and device functionality through innovative product development
based on our existing capabilities and technological advances.
2
Capitalize on Growth of New Markets
We intend to capitalize on the growth of new markets, including the digital lifestyle products
markets, brought about by the convergence of computing, communications, and entertainment devices.
We plan to offer innovative, intuitive human interface solutions that address the evolving
portability, connectivity, and functionality requirements of these new markets. We plan to offer
these solutions to existing and potential OEM customers to enable increased functionality, reduced
size, lower cost, and enhanced industrial design features and to enhance the user experience of
their products. We plan to utilize our existing technologies as well as aggressively pursue new
technologies as new markets evolve that demand new solutions.
Emphasize and Expand Customer Relationships
We plan to emphasize and expand our strong and long-lasting customer relationships and to
establish successful relationships with new customers. In each market we serve, we plan to provide
the most advanced human interface solutions for our customers products. We believe that our human
interface solutions enable our customers to deliver a positive user experience and to differentiate
their products from those of their competitors. We continually attempt to enhance the competitive
position of our customers by providing them with innovative, distinctive, and high-quality human
interface solutions on a timely and cost-effective basis. To do so, we work continually to improve
our productivity, to reduce costs, and to speed the delivery of our human interface solutions. We
endeavor to streamline the entire design and delivery process through our ongoing design,
engineering, and production improvement efforts. We also focus on providing timely support to our
customers after the purchase of our human interface solutions.
We plan to increase our business with existing customers and attract new customers by offering
design tools, documentation, a family of capacitive sensing ASICs, and technical support to enable
them to develop their own human interface designs for capacitive buttons and scrolling applications
in products such as mobile smartphones and feature phones, portable digital music and video
players, and PC peripherals. As a result, customers have a choice of determining the most optimal
way to meet their emerging and growing needs: our traditional custom module solutions or our
OneTouch solution, which offers a flexible alternative when design integration or quick turns are
important.
Pursue Strategic Relationships and Acquisitions
We intend to develop and expand strategic relationships to enhance our ability to offer
value-added human interface solutions to our customers, penetrate new markets, and strengthen the
technological leadership of our product solutions. We also consider the potential acquisition of
companies in order to expand our technological expertise and to establish or strengthen our
presence in selected target markets.
Continue Virtual Manufacturing
We plan to expand and diversify our production capacity through third-party relationships,
thereby strengthening our virtual manufacturing platform. This strategy results in a scalable
business model; enables us to concentrate on our core competencies of research and development,
technological advances, and product design and engineering; and reduces our capital expenditures
and working capital requirements. Our virtual manufacturing strategy allows us to maintain a
variable cost model, in which we do not incur most of our manufacturing costs until our product
solutions have been shipped and billed to our customers.
Product Solutions
We develop and enhance interface technologies that enrich the users experience in interacting
with the users mobile computing, communications, and entertainment devices. Our innovative and
intuitive human interface solutions can be engineered to accommodate many diverse platforms, and
our expertise in human factors and usability can be utilized to improve the features and
functionality of our solutions. Our extensive array of technologies includes ASICs, firmware,
software, mechanical and electrical designs, and pattern recognition and touch sensing
technologies.
Our custom-designed human interface solutions are custom engineered, total solutions for our
customers and include sensor design, module layout, ASICs, firmware, and software features for
which we provide
3
manufacturing and design support and device testing. This allows us to be a one-stop supplier
for complete human interface design from the early design stage, to manufacturing, to testing and
support. Our OneTouch offering includes design tools, documentation, a family of capacitive
sensing ASICs, and technical support to enable customers to develop their own human interface
designs for capacitive buttons and scrolling applications. Through our technologies and expertise,
we seek to provide our customers with solutions that address their individual design issues and
result in high-performance, feature-rich, and reliable interface solutions. We believe our
interface solutions offer the following characteristics:
|
|
|
Ease of Use. Our interface solutions offer the ease of use and intuitive interaction
that users demand. |
|
|
|
|
Small Size. The small, thin size of our interface solutions enables our customers to
reduce the overall size and weight of their products in order to satisfy consumer demand
for portability. |
|
|
|
|
Low Power Consumption. The low power consumption of our interface solutions enables
our customers to offer products with longer battery life or smaller battery size. |
|
|
|
|
Advanced Functionality. Our interface solutions offer advanced features, such as
virtual scrolling, customizable tap zones, edge motion, and tapping and dragging icons,
to enhance the user experience. |
|
|
|
|
Reliability. The reliability of our interface solutions satisfies consumer
requirements for dependability, which is a major component of consumer satisfaction. |
|
|
|
|
Durability. Our interface solutions withstand repeated use, harsh physical
treatment, and temperature fluctuations while providing a superior level of performance. |
We believe these characteristics will enable us to maintain our leadership position in the PC
market and to enhance our position as a technological enabler within the markets for digital
lifestyle products and other electronic devices, including mobile smartphones and feature phones
and portable digital music and video players.
Our human interface solutions are intended to satisfy our customers specification needs,
including features and functionality, industrial design, mechanical, and electrical requirements.
Our products also offer unique integration options, including allowing our capacitive sensors to be
placed underneath the plastic of the device, which allows for streamlined and stylized designs,
incorporating LEDs to indicate status or enhance industrial design, and incorporating tactile
indicators, including ridges, Braille bumps, and textures designed to provide the user with
additional feedback.
Our emphasis on technological leadership and design capabilities positions us to provide
unique human interface solutions that address specific customer requirements. Our long-term
working relationships with large, global OEMs provide us with experience in satisfying their
demanding design specifications and other requirements. Our custom product solutions provide OEMs
with numerous benefits, including the following:
|
|
|
modular integration; |
|
|
|
|
reduced product development costs; |
|
|
|
|
shorter product time to market; |
|
|
|
|
compact and efficient platforms; |
|
|
|
|
improved product functionality and utility; and |
|
|
|
|
product differentiation. |
We work with our customers in order to meet their technical and functional specifications,
their industrial design requirements, and their desire to differentiate their products from those
of their competitors. This collaborative effort reduces the duplication and overlap of investment
and resources, enabling our OEM customers to devote more time and resources to the market
development of their products.
4
We utilize capacitive technology rather than resistive or mechanical technology in our product
solutions. Unlike resistive and mechanical technology, our solid state capacitive technology has
no moving parts or activation force, thereby offering a durable, more reliable solution that can be
integrated into both curved and flat surfaces. Capacitive technologies also allow for much thinner
sensors than resistive or mechanical technology, providing for slimmer, more compact and unique
industrial designs.
Products
Our family of product solutions allows our customers to solve their interface needs and
differentiate their products from those of their competitors.
TouchPad
Our TouchPad, which takes the place and exceeds the functionality of a mouse, is a small,
touch-sensitive pad that senses the position of a persons finger on its surface through the
measurement of capacitance. Our TouchPad provides an accurate, comfortable, and reliable method
for screen navigation and cursor movement and provides a platform for interactive input. Our
TouchPad solutions allow our customers to provide stylish, simple, user-friendly, and intuitive
human interface solutions for both the consumer and corporate markets. Our TouchPad solutions
offer various advanced features, including the following:
|
|
|
Virtual scrolling. This feature enables the user to scroll through any document by
swiping a finger along the side or bottom of the TouchPad. |
|
|
|
|
Customizable tap zones. These zones permit designated portions of the TouchPad to be
used to simulate mouse clicks, launch applications, and perform other selected
functions. |
|
|
|
|
EdgeMotionTM. This feature permits cursor movement to continue when a
users finger reaches the edge of the TouchPad. |
|
|
|
|
Tapping and dragging of icons. This feature allows the user to simply tap and hold
on an icon in order to drag it, rather than being forced to hold a button down in order
to drag an icon. |
|
|
|
|
Multi-finger gestures. This feature allows the user to designate specific actions
when more than one finger is used on the TouchPad. |
Our TouchPad solutions are available in a variety of sizes, electrical interfaces, and
thicknesses. Our TouchPad solutions are designed to meet the electrical and mechanical
specifications of our customers. Customized firmware and driver software ensure the availability
of specialized features. As a result of their solid state characteristics, our TouchPad solutions
have no moving parts that wear out, resulting in a robust and reliable input solution that also
allows for unique industrial designs.
TouchStyk
Our TouchStyk is a proprietary pointing stick interface solution. TouchStyk is a
self-contained, easily integrated module that uses capacitive technology similar to that of our
TouchPad. TouchStyk is enabled with press-to-select and tap-to-click capabilities and can be
easily integrated into multiple computing and communications devices. In addition, our design
greatly reduces susceptibility to electromagnetic interference, thereby providing greater pointing
accuracy and preventing the pointer from drifting when not in use.
We are currently shipping our TouchStyk in notebooks, portable multimedia players, and ultra
mobile personal computers. Our modular approach allows OEMs to include our TouchPad, our
TouchStyk, or a combination of both interfaces in their products.
Dual Pointing Solutions
Our dual pointing solutions offer a TouchPad with a pointing stick in a single notebook
computer, enabling users to select their interface of choice. Our dual pointing solution also
provides the end user the ability to use both interfaces interchangeably. Our dual pointing
solution provides the following advantages:
5
|
|
|
cost-effective and simplified OEM integration; |
|
|
|
|
simplified OEM product line because one device contains both solutions; |
|
|
|
|
single-source supplier, which eliminates compatibility issues; and |
|
|
|
|
end user flexibility because one notebook can address both user preferences. |
We have developed two solutions for use in the dual pointing market. Our first solution
integrates all the electronics for controlling a third-party resistive strain gauge pointing stick
onto our TouchPad PCB. This solution simplifies OEM integration by eliminating the need to procure
the pointing stick electronics from another party and physically integrate them into the notebook.
Our second dual pointing solution uses our TouchStyk rather than a third-party pointing stick and
offers the same simplified OEM integration. The second solution is a completely modular design,
allowing OEMs to offer TouchPad-only, TouchStyk-only, or dual pointing solutions on a
build-to-order basis.
LuxPad
LuxPad is an innovative illuminated TouchPad. The LuxPad is designed to allow our customers
to differentiate their products. The LuxPad can either light up the entire touchpad, light up a
logo in the center of the TouchPad, or light up designated virtual buttons on the TouchPad,
depending on the preference of the notebook designer.
Dual Mode TouchPad
Dual Mode TouchPad is designed to transform the TouchPad from a cursor control device to a
launch and control center with the touch of a button. In default mode, the Dual Mode provides the
same cursor control for on screen navigation as a standard TouchPad. When the user taps on a
launch icon located on the TouchPad surface, control icons illuminate on the TouchPad surface.
The Dual Mode offers a variety of customization options to the OEM, including tap zones for
launching applications and multimedia controls, scrolling zones to adjust volume, and programmable
buttons so end users can choose which application they would like to launch through our Dual Mode
driver. To regain cursor control, the user simply taps the mode switch button and the illuminated
icons disappear, allowing the user to control the cursor for on-screen navigation.
TouchRing
Our TouchRing is an integrated, solid state scrolling wheel utilizing our capacitive touch
sensing technology that enables the user to navigate through menus and scroll through lists. Our
TouchRing is utilized in MP3 players, personal media players, and remote controls, enabling the
user to navigate efficiently through menus and scroll through extensive play lists and songs.
ScrollStrip
ScrollStrip is a one-dimensional TouchPad that provides a simple and intuitive way for users
to scroll through menus, navigate through content, and adjust controls. A ScrollStrip can be used
in a wide variety of applications that require a thin, robust, accurate, and easy-to-use input and
navigation device, including PC peripherals, such as keyboards and mice, and digital lifestyle
products. ScrollStrip is thin, lightweight, and flexible and can be mounted on curved surfaces to
meet the industrial design needs of our OEM customers. Currently, the ScrollStrip is incorporated
into a number of devices, including MP3 players, PC keyboards, and computer mice.
LightTouch
LightTouch is a simple, easy to use, stylish interface solution that replaces mechanical
buttons with an illuminated sensor programmed to perform functions, such as multimedia controls,
including pause, play, fast-forward, and rewind. LightTouch is designed for integration under the
plastic face of a device, allowing for a sealed, thin design that is both stylish and durable.
Currently, a number of custom LightTouch solutions are
6
available in the market, including multimedia controls for notebook PCs, a multimedia
keyboard, and as button controls for MP3 players.
MobileTouch
MobileTouch is a new product solution specifically designed for the mobile phone environment
that combines our expertise in ease of use with our technology capabilities. The result is
custom-designed modules that can combine our scrolling, selection, and navigation capabilities into
a simple, easy to use interface solution that improves access to mobile phone content and
applications. MobileTouch can be mounted beneath the plastic of the phone, making it well suited to
the mobile phone environment where slim design and durability are essential.
SmartTouch
SmartTouch is a software-configurable auxiliary interface for notebook computers that enables
notebook computer OEMs to offer their customers the advanced functionality and customizability of
our software-configured LightTouch control bar with on-screen display. Our SmartTouch solution
replaces conventional multimedia buttons with virtual contextual controls that automatically adapt
to the software application that is being used at the time to present customized browser, media
player, DVD player, or systems controls and enables users to personalize touch control behavior,
including audio feedback, touch sensibility, illumination, control functions, and control
placement.
ClearPad
ClearPad consists of a clear, thin capacitive sensor that can be placed over any viewable
surface, including display devices, such as LCDs. Similar to our traditional TouchPad, our
ClearPad has various distinct advantages, including light weight; low profile form factor; high
reliability, durability, and accuracy; and low power consumption. ClearPad can be mounted on or
under curved surfaces, providing for unique and sleek industrial designs.
ClearArray
ClearArray is an extension of our core capacitive sensing technology that has been used in
touch pads for notebook PCs. ClearArray is a clear sensor that can be mounted under plastic,
providing OEMs with easy integration and attractive design options for scrolling and buttons.
NavPoint
The NavPoint solution offers users improved functionality and versatility in accessing and
managing content in handheld devices through unique navigation controls, including short- and
long-distance scrolling features, tapping, and mouse-like cursor navigation.
OneTouch
OneTouch is a configurable solution based on our capacitive sensing technology, which includes
a capacitive sensing ASIC, easy-to-use design tools, documentation, and technical support, that
enables customers to develop their own custom interface designs in-house for capacitive buttons and
scrolling applications in various products, including mobile smartphones and feature phones,
portable digital media players, and PC peripherals, such as monitors, keyboards, mice, and remote
controls. OneTouch increases our reach from a customer standpoint by offering them an alternative
and flexible way to leverage our technology and know-how whether through our traditional custom
module solution or through the new OneTouch capability that allows them to implement capacitive
sensing in-house when design integration or quick design turns are important.
QuickStroke
QuickStroke provides a fast, easy, and accurate way to input Chinese characters. Using our
recognition technology that combines our patented software with our TouchPad, QuickStroke can
recognize handwritten, partially finished Chinese characters, thereby saving considerable time and
effort. Our QuickStroke, which operates with our touch pad products, can be integrated into
notebook computers, keyboards, and a host of stand-alone interface devices that use either a pen or
a finger.
7
Our patented Incremental Recognition Technology allows users to simply enter the first few
strokes of a Chinese character, and QuickStroke accurately interprets the intended character.
Since the typical Chinese character consists of an average of 13 strokes, QuickStroke technology
saves considerable time and effort. We can port different alphabets or characters to our
underlying pattern recognition engine, allowing us to offer support for different languages.
Technologies
We have developed and own an extensive array of technologies, encompassing ASICs, firmware,
software, pattern recognition, and touch sensing technologies. With 94 U.S. patents in force and
80 U.S. patents pending, as well as many non-U.S. counterparts, we continue to develop technology
in these areas. We believe these technologies and the related intellectual property create
barriers for competitors and allow us to provide human interface solutions in a variety of
high-growth market segments.
Our broad line of human interface solutions currently is based upon the following key
technologies:
|
|
|
capacitive position sensing technology; |
|
|
|
|
capacitive force sensing technology; |
|
|
|
|
transparent capacitive position sensing technology; |
|
|
|
|
pattern recognition technology; |
|
|
|
|
mixed signal integrated circuit technology; and |
|
|
|
|
proprietary microcontroller technology. |
In addition to these technologies, we develop firmware and device driver software that we
incorporate into our products, which provide unique features, such as virtual scrolling,
customizable tap zones, PalmCheck, EdgeMotion, and tapping and dragging of icons. In addition, our
ability to integrate all of our products to interface with major operating systems, including
Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows NT, Windows CE, Windows XP, Windows ME, Windows Vista, Mac OS,
Pocket PC, Palm OS, Symbian, UNIX, and LINUX, provides us with a competitive advantage.
Capacitive Position Sensing Technology. This technology provides a method for sensing the
presence, position, and contact area of one or more fingers or a conductive stylus on a flat or
curved surface, such as our TouchPad, TouchRing, and ScrollStrip. Our technology works with very
light touch and provides highly responsive cursor navigation, scrolling, and selection. It uses no
moving parts, can be implemented under plastic, and is extremely durable.
Capacitive Force Sensing Technology. This technology senses the direction and magnitude of a
force applied to an object. The object can either move when force is applied, like a typical
joystick used for gaming applications, or it can be isometric, with no perceptible motion during
use, like our TouchStyk. The primary competition for this technology is resistive strain gauge
technology. Resistive strain gauge technology requires electronics that can sense very small
changes in resistance, presenting challenges to the design of that circuitry, including sensitivity
to electrical noise and interference. Our electronic circuitry determines the magnitude and
direction of an applied force, permits very accurate sensing of tiny changes in capacitance, and
minimizes electrical interference from other sources.
Transparent Capacitive Position Sensing Technology. This technology allows us to build
transparent sensors for use with our capacitive position sensing technology, such as in our
ClearPad. It has all the advantages of our capacitive position sensing technology and allows for
visual feedback when incorporated with a display device, such as an LCD. Our technology does not
require calibration, does not produce undesirable internal reflections, and has reduced power
requirements, allowing for longer battery life.
Pattern Recognition Technology. This technology is a set of software algorithms and
techniques for converting real-world data, such as handwriting, into a digital form that can be
recognized and manipulated within a
8
computer, such as our QuickStroke product and gesture decoding for our TouchPad products. Our
technology provides reliable handwriting recognition and can be used in other applications such as
signature verification.
Mixed SignalIntegrated Circuit Technology. This hybrid analog-digital integrated circuit
technology combines the power of digital computation with the ability to interface with
non-digital, real-world signals, such as the position of a finger or stylus on a surface. Our
patented design techniques permit us to utilize this technology to optimize our core ASIC engine
for all our products.
Proprietary Microcontroller Technology. This technology consists of a proprietary 16-bit
microcontroller core embedded in the digital portion of our mixed signal ASIC, which allows us to
optimize our ASIC for position sensing tasks. Our embedded microcontroller provides great
flexibility in customizing our product solutions utilizing firmware, which eliminates the need to
design new circuitry for each new application.
Competing Technology
Many human interface solutions currently utilize resistive sensing technology. Resistive
sensing technology consists of a flexible membrane above a flat, rigid, electrically conductive
surface. When finger or stylus pressure is applied to the membrane, it deforms until it makes
contact with the rigid layer below, at which point attached electronics can determine the position
of the finger or stylus. Since the flexible membrane is a moving part, it is susceptible to
mechanical wear and will eventually suffer degraded performance. Due to the way that resistive
position sensors work, it is not possible for them to detect more than a single finger or stylus at
any given time. The positional accuracy of a resistive sensor is limited by the uniformity of the
resistive coating as well as by the mechanics of the flexible membrane. Finally, implementations
of resistive technology over display devices, such as an LCD, result in reduced transmissivity, or
the amount of light that can pass through the display, requiring the use of backlighting and
thereby reducing the battery life of the device.
Research and Development
We conduct ongoing research and development programs that focus on advancing our technologies,
developing new products, improving design and manufacturing processes, and enhancing the quality
and performance of our product solutions. Our goal is to provide our customers with innovative
solutions that address their needs and improve their competitive positions. Our research and
development is focused on advancing our existing interface technologies, improving our current
product solutions, and expanding our technologies to serve new markets. Our vision is to offer
human interface solutions, such as touch, handwriting, vision, and voice capabilities, that can be
readily incorporated into varied electronic devices.
Our research and development programs focus on the development of accurate, easy to use,
reliable, and intuitive human interfaces for electronic devices. We believe our innovative
interface technologies can be applied to many diverse products. We believe the interface is a key
factor in the differentiation of these products. We believe that our interface technologies enable
us to provide customers with product solutions that have significant advantages over alternative
technologies in terms of functionality, size, power consumption, durability, and reliability. We
also intend to pursue strategic relationships and acquisitions to enhance our research and
development capabilities, leverage our technology, and shorten our time to market with new
technological applications.
Our research, design, and engineering teams frequently work directly with our customers to
design custom solutions for specific applications. We focus on enabling our customers to overcome
technical barriers and enhance the performance of their products. We believe our engineering
know-how and electronic systems expertise provide significant benefits to our customers by enabling
them to concentrate on their core competencies of production and marketing.
As of June 30, 2008, we employed 236 people in our technology, engineering, and product design
functions in the United States, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan. Our research and development
expenses were approximately $35.4 million, $39.4 million, and $50.1 million in fiscal 2006, 2007,
and 2008, respectively.
9
Intellectual Property Rights
Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability to maintain the proprietary
aspects of our technologies and products. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade
secrets, trademarks, confidentiality agreements, and other contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property, but these measures may provide only limited protection. Our research,
design, and engineering teams frequently work directly with our OEM customers to design custom
solutions for specific applications.
We hold 94 U.S. patents in force and have 80 U.S. patents pending, as well as many non-U.S.
counterparts to the U.S. patents and U.S. patents pending. Collectively, these patents and patents
pending cover various aspects of our key technologies, including touch sensing, pen sensing,
handwriting recognition, customizable tap zones, edge motion, and virtual scrolling technologies.
Our proprietary software is protected by copyright laws. The source code for our proprietary
software is also protected under applicable trade secret laws.
Our extensive array of technologies includes ASICs, firmware, software, and pattern
recognition and position sensing technologies. Our products rely on a combination of these
technologies, making it difficult to use any single technology as the basis for replicating our
products. Furthermore, the length and customization of the customer design cycle serve to protect
our intellectual property rights.
Patent applications that we have filed or may file in the future may not result in a patent
being issued. Our issued patents may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, and claims of
our patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength, or issued in the proper geographic regions,
to provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage. We have not applied for, and do not
have, any copyright registration on our technologies or products. We have applied to register
certain of our trademarks in the United States and other countries. There can be no assurance that
we will obtain registrations of trademarks in key markets. Failure to obtain registrations could
compromise our ability to protect fully our trademarks and brands and could increase the risk of
challenge from third parties to our use of our trademarks and brands. In addition, our failure to
enforce and protect our intellectual property rights or obtain from third parties the right to use
necessary technology could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
We do not consistently rely on written agreements with our customers, suppliers,
manufacturers, and other recipients of our technologies and products, and therefore some trade
secret protection may be lost and our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights may be
limited. Furthermore, our customers, suppliers, manufacturers, and other recipients of our
technologies and products may seek to use our technologies and products without appropriate
limitations. In the past, we did not consistently require our employees and consultants to enter
into confidentiality agreements, employment agreements, or proprietary information and invention
agreements. Therefore, our former employees and consultants may try to claim some ownership
interest in our technologies and products and may use our technologies and products competitively
and without appropriate limitations.
Other companies, including our competitors, may develop technologies that are similar or
superior to our technologies, duplicate our technologies, or design around our patents and may have
or obtain patents or other proprietary rights that would prevent, limit, or interfere with our
ability to make, use, or sell our products. Effective intellectual property protection may be
unavailable or limited in some foreign countries in which we operate, such as China and Taiwan.
Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use aspects of our technologies and products
that we regard as proprietary. There can be no assurance that our means of protecting our
proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate or that competitors will not
independently develop similar technologies. If our intellectual property protection is
insufficient to protect our intellectual property rights, we could face increased competition in
the market for our technologies and products.
We may receive notices from third parties that claim our products infringe their rights. From
time to time, we receive notice from third parties of the intellectual property rights such parties
have obtained. We cannot be certain that our technologies and products do not and will not
infringe issued patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. Any infringement claims,
with or without merit, could result in significant litigation costs and diversion of resources,
including the payment of damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
10
Customers
Our customers include many of the worlds largest PC OEMs, based on unit shipments, as well as
a variety of consumer electronics manufacturers. Our demonstrated track record of technological
leadership, design innovation, product performance, cost effectiveness, and on-time delivery have
resulted in our leadership position in providing human interface solutions. We believe our strong
relationship with our OEM customers, many of which are currently developing digital lifestyle
products, will position us as a source of supply for their product offerings.
Our industry leading OEM customers in fiscal 2008 included the following:
|
|
|
Acer |
|
|
|
|
Asustek |
|
|
|
|
Dell |
|
|
|
|
Fujitsu |
|
|
|
|
Gateway |
|
|
|
|
Hewlett-Packard |
|
|
|
Lenovo |
|
|
|
|
LG Electronics |
|
|
|
|
Microsoft |
|
|
|
|
Samsung |
|
|
|
|
Sharp |
|
|
|
|
Toshiba |
We generally supply custom-designed products to our OEM customers through their contract
manufacturers. We sell our custom-designed products directly to these contract manufacturers,
which include Compal, Hon Hai, Inventec, Kang Zhun Electronics, Shanghai Yi Hsin, S-Mac, Wistron,
and Zhan Yun Shanghai Electronics. Sales to Zhan Yun accounted for approximately 10% of our net
revenue for fiscal 2008. Sales to Compal and Wistron in the aggregate accounted for approximately
26% of our net revenue for fiscal 2007. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our net
revenue for either fiscal 2007 or 2008. We supply our OneTouch solution directly to our OEM
customers.
We consider both the OEMs and their contract manufacturers to be our customers. Both the OEMs
and their contract manufacturers may determine the design and pricing requirements and make the
overall decision regarding the use of our human interface solutions in their products. The
contract manufacturers place orders with us for the purchase of our products, take title to the
products purchased upon shipment by us, and pay us directly for those purchases. These customers
have no return privileges except for warranty provisions.
Strategic Relationships
We have used strategic relationships to enhance our ability to offer value-added customer
solutions in the past and we intend to enter into additional strategic relationships with companies
that may help us serve our target markets.
Sales and Marketing
We sell our product solutions for incorporation into the products of our OEM customers. We
generate sales through direct sales employees as well as outside sales representatives and
distributors. Our sales personnel receive substantial technical assistance and support from our
internal engineering resources because of the highly technical nature of our product solutions.
Sales frequently result from multi-level sales efforts that involve senior management, design
engineers, and our sales personnel interacting with our customers decision makers throughout the
product development and order process.
We currently employ 86 sales and marketing professionals. We maintain eight customer support
offices domestically and internationally, which are located in the United States, Taiwan, China,
Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, and Switzerland. In addition, we utilize sales representatives in Korea,
Singapore, and Malaysia and sales distributors in Japan and Taiwan.
International sales constituted approximately 98%, 99%, and 99% of our revenue for fiscal
2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively. Over 81% of our sales were made to companies located in China
and Taiwan that provide design and manufacturing services for major notebook computer and digital
lifestyle product OEMs. All of our sales were denominated in U.S. dollars.
11
Manufacturing
We employ a virtual manufacturing platform through third-party relationships. We currently
utilize two semiconductor wafer manufacturers to supply us with silicon wafers integrating our
proprietary design specifications. The completed silicon wafers are forwarded to third-party
package and test processors for further processing into die and packaged ASICs, as applicable,
which are then utilized in our custom interface products or processed as our OneTouch products.
After processing and testing, the die and ASICs are consigned to various contract
manufacturers for assembly or, in the case of OneTouch ASICs, are shipped directly to our
customers. During the assembly process, our die or ASIC is combined with other components to
complete the module for our custom human interface solution. The finished assembled product is
subsequently shipped by our contract manufacturers directly to our customers for integration into
their products.
We believe our virtual manufacturing strategy provides a scalable business model; enables us
to concentrate on our core competencies of research and development, technological advances, and
product design; and reduces our capital expenditures. In addition, this strategy significantly
reduces our working capital requirements for inventory because we do not incur most of our
manufacturing costs until we have actually shipped our interface products to our customers and
billed those customers for those products.
Our third-party contract manufacturers are Asian-based organizations. We provide our contract
manufacturers with six-month rolling forecasts of our production requirements. We do not, however,
have long-term agreements with any of our contract manufacturers that guarantee production
capacity, prices, lead times, or delivery schedules. The strategy of relying on those parties
exposes us to vulnerability owing to our dependence on few sources of supply. We believe, however,
that other sources of supply are available. In addition, we may establish relationships with other
contract manufacturers in order to reduce our dependence on any one source of supply.
Periodically, we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers when a customers delivery
schedule is delayed or a customers order is cancelled. In those circumstances in which our
customer has cancelled its order and we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers, we
consider a write-down to reduce the carrying value of the inventory purchased to its net realizable
value. Write-downs to reduce the carrying value of obsolete, slow moving, and non-usable inventory
to net realizable value are charged to cost of revenue.
Backlog
As of June 30, 2008, we had a backlog of orders of $50.3 million, an increase of $3.4 million
compared with a backlog of orders as of June 30, 2007 of $46.9 million. The increase in backlog is
primarily related to the increase in demand for our products. Our backlog consists of product
orders for which purchase orders have been received and which are scheduled for shipment in the
subsequent quarter. Most orders are subject to rescheduling or cancellation with limited
penalties. Because of the possibility of customer changes in product shipments, our backlog as of
a particular date may not be indicative of net sales for any succeeding period.
Competition
Our principal competitor in the sale of notebook touch pads and notebook pointing sticks is
Alps Electric, a Japanese conglomerate. In the markets for digital lifestyle products and other
electronic devices, our competitors include Cypress, Atmel, Melfas, Elan, and various other
companies involved in human interface solutions. In certain cases, large OEMs may develop
alternative human interface solutions for their own products or provide key components for use in
designing human interface solutions.
In the notebook human interface market, we plan to continue to compete primarily on the basis
of our technological expertise, design innovation, customer service, and the long track record of
performance of our human interface solutions, including their ease of use, reliability, and
cost-effectiveness as well as their timely design, production, and delivery schedules. Our
pointing stick solutions, including our proprietary TouchStyk, enable us to address the approximate
2% of the notebook computer market that uses solely a pointing stick rather than a touch pad as the
human interface as well as the approximate 10% of the notebook market that uses dual pointing
12
interfaces. Our ability to supply OEMs with TouchPads, TouchStyks, and dual pointing
alternatives enhances our market position as we can provide OEMs with the following advantages:
|
|
|
single source supplier to eliminate compatibility issues; |
|
|
|
|
cost-effective and simplified integration; |
|
|
|
|
simplified product line to address both interface preferences; |
|
|
|
|
end user flexibility because one notebook can address both user preferences; |
|
|
|
|
highly experienced engineering resources, particularly in the mechanical, industrial
design, and electrical areas as the general notebook market embraces thinner and lighter
designs; and |
|
|
|
|
modular approach allowing OEMs to utilize our TouchPad, our TouchStyk, or a
combination of both interfaces. |
In the human interface markets for digital lifestyle products and other electronic devices, we
compete primarily based on the advantages of our systems knowledge of capacitive sensing and
pattern recognition technologies. We believe our solutions-based engineering expertise coupled
with our technologies offer benefits in terms of size, power consumption, durability, light
transmissivity, resolution, ease of use, and reliability when compared to our competitors and other
technologies. While these markets continue to evolve, we believe we are positioned to compete
aggressively for this business based on our proven track record, our marquee global customer base,
and our reputation for design innovation. In addition, new competitors, alliances among
competitors, or alliances among competitors and OEMs may emerge and allow competitors to rapidly
acquire significant market share.
Furthermore, our competitors or our customers may develop technologies in the future that more
effectively address the human interface needs of the notebook market and other markets. Our sales,
profitability, and success depend on our ability to compete with other suppliers of human interface
solutions and components used in human interface solutions. Our competitive position could be
adversely affected if one or more of our current OEMs reduce their orders or if we are unable to
develop new customers for our human interface solutions.
Employees
As of June 30, 2008, we employed a total of 420 persons, including 98 in finance,
administration, and operations; 86 in sales and marketing; and 236 in research and development. Of
these employees, 266 were located in North America, 150 in Asia/Pacific, and 4 in Europe. We
consider our relationship with our employees to be good, and none of our employees are represented
by a union in collective bargaining with us.
Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is extremely intense, particularly for
engineering and other technical personnel. Our success depends on our continued ability to
attract, hire, and retain qualified personnel.
13
Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Francis F. Lee
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Tiernan
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell J. Knittel
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David B. Long
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President of World Wide Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Wong
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Vice President of World Wide Operations |
Francis F. Lee has served as a director and Chief Executive Officer of our company since
January 1999. He was a consultant from August 1998 to November 1998. From May 1995 until July
1998, Mr. Lee served as General Manager of NSM, a Hong Kong-based joint venture between National
Semiconductor Corporation and S. Megga. Mr. Lee held a variety of executive positions for National
Semiconductor from 1988 until August 1995. These positions included Vice President of
Communication and Computing Group, Vice President of Quality and Reliability, Director of Standard
Logic Business Unit, and various other operations and engineering management positions. Mr. Lee is
a director of Foveon, Inc., a privately held company in which we have an ownership interest. Mr.
Lee holds a Bachelor of Science degree, with honors, in electrical engineering from the University
of California at Davis.
Thomas J. Tiernan has served as a director and the President and Chief Operating Officer since
July 2008. Mr. Tiernan served as Executive Vice President and General Manager of our company from
July 2007 until July 2008 and as Senior Vice President of our company from March 2006 until July
2007. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Tiernan served as Vice President and General Manager of
Symbol Technologies Mobile Computing Division. From 1985 to 2004, Mr. Tiernan held various
management and executive positions at Hewlett-Packard, including running the Network Storage
business in the Americas, the Enterprise Systems business in Asia Pacific, and the PC business in
Japan. Mr. Tiernan holds a Bachelors Degree in Electrical Engineering from California State
Polytechnic University and a Masters of Science in Computer Engineering from Santa Clara
University.
Russell J. Knittel has been Executive Vice President of our company since July 2007 and Chief
Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of our company since
November 2001. Mr. Knittel served as Senior Vice President of our company from November 2001 until
July 2007. He served as the Vice President of Administration and Finance, Chief Financial Officer,
and Secretary of our company from April 2000 through October 2001. Mr. Knittel served as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Probe Technology Corporation from May 1999 to March 2000.
He was a consultant from January 1999 until April 1999. Mr. Knittel was Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer at Starlight Networks from November 1994 to December 1998. Mr. Knittel holds a
Bachelor of Arts degree in accounting from California State University at Fullerton and a Masters
of Business Administration from San Jose State University.
David B. Long has been the Vice President of World Wide Sales of our company since January
2008. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Long served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales for
Consumer Products at LSI Logic Corporation where he directed the management of sales and customer
support for standard and custom silicon solutions. From 2003 to 2006, he served as the Vice
President of Asia Pacific Sales focused on the Consumer and Storage product segments. He was the
Director of North American-West Sales for LSI Operations from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Long also managed
LSIs worldwide account with Cisco Systems from 1998 until 2002, directing an extended team of
sales, engineering, marketing, operations, and customer service representatives. Mr. Long received
a Bachelors degree in Business Administration/Marketing Management from California Polytechnic
University, San Luis Obispo in 1985.
14
Alex Wong has been the Vice President of World Wide Operations of our company since September
2006. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Wong served our company as Managing Director of Hong Kong and
Director of Operations. Prior to joining Synaptics, Mr. Wong held various management positions
with National Semiconductor, including General Manager for National Joint Ventures in China and
Hong Kong as well as the Director of Corporate Business Development. Mr. Wong holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Computer Science from California State University at Northridge and a Masters in
Business Administration from the University of East Asia, Macau.
15
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following factors, together with all the other information
included in this report, in evaluating our company and our business.
We currently depend on our TouchPad and TouchStyk products, and the notebook computer market, for a
significant portion of our revenue, and a downturn in these products or this market could have a
disproportionate impact on our revenue.
Historically, we have derived a very substantial portion of our revenue from the sale of our
TouchPad and TouchStyk products for notebook computers. While our long-term objective is to derive
revenue from multiple human interface solutions for both the notebook computer market and the
markets for digital lifestyle products and other electronic devices, we anticipate that sales of
our TouchPads and TouchStyks for notebooks will continue to represent a significant portion of our
revenue. The PC market as a whole has experienced a slowdown in the rate of growth. A continued
or accelerated softening in the demand in the notebook portion of the PC market or the level of our
participation in that market would cause our business, financial condition, and results of
operations to suffer more than they would have if we offered a more diversified line of products.
Net revenue from our human interface solutions for digital lifestyle products have been volatile in
the past, and our net revenue from our human interface solutions for digital lifestyle products may
not increase or be less volatile in the future.
Net revenue from our human interface solutions for digital lifestyle products, particularly
portable digital music players, have been volatile in the past. Net revenue from our human
interface solutions for mobile smartphones and feature phones only recently became material. Our
net revenue from our human interface solutions for digital lifestyle products may not increase or
be less volatile in the future. Net revenue from our human interface solutions for digital
lifestyle products were $40.6 million (which included $32.7 million for digital music and video
players and $7.5 million for mobile smartphones and feature phones), or 15% of our net revenue, in
fiscal 2007 and $88.3 million (which included $40.5 million for digital music and video players and
$47.7 million for mobile smartphones and feature phones), or 24% of our net revenue, in fiscal
2008. Further, our interface business for digital lifestyle products faces many uncertainties,
including our success in penetrating new markets dominated by a limited number of OEMs. Our
inability to address these uncertainties successfully and to become a leading supplier of human
interfaces for digital lifestyle products would result in a slower growth rate than we currently
anticipate. We do not know whether our human interface solutions for the digital lifestyle product
market will gain market acceptance or will ever result in a substantial portion of our revenue on a
consistent basis. The failure to succeed in these other markets would result in no return on the
substantial investments we have made to date and plan to make in the future to penetrate these
markets.
We cannot assure you that our human interface business for digital lifestyle products will be
successful or that we will be able to generate significant revenue from the markets for digital
lifestyle products.
Various target markets for our interfaces, such as those for mobile smartphones and feature
phones, GPS devices, smart handheld devices, and interactive games and toys, are uncertain, may
develop slower than anticipated, or could utilize competing technologies. The market for certain
of these products depends in part upon the development and deployment of wireless and other
technologies, which may or may not address the needs of users of these new products.
Our ability to generate significant revenue from the markets for certain digital lifestyle
products will depend on various factors, including the following:
|
|
|
the development and growth of these markets; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of our technologies and product solutions to address the needs of these
markets, the requirements of OEMs, and the preferences of end users; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide OEMs with human interface solutions that provide advantages in
terms of size, power consumption, reliability, durability, performance, and value-added
features compared with alternative solutions. |
16
Many manufacturers of these products have well-established relationships with competitive
suppliers. Penetrating these markets will require us to offer better performance alternatives to
existing solutions at competitive costs. We generally do not have a significant backlog of orders
for our human interface solutions to be incorporated in products in these markets. The failure of
any of these target markets to develop as we expect, or our failure to penetrate these markets to a
significant extent, will impede our anticipated sales growth and could result in substantially
reduced earnings from those we anticipate. We cannot predict the size or growth rate of these
markets or the market share we will achieve in these markets in the future.
Our historical financial performance is based primarily on net revenue generated from our human
interface solutions to the notebook computer market and may not be indicative of our future
performance in other markets.
Our historical financial performance primarily reflects net revenue generated from our human
interface solutions for notebook computers. While we expect sales of our human interface solutions
for notebook computers to continue to generate a substantial percentage of our revenue, we expect
to derive an increasing portion of our revenue from sales of our product solutions for digital
lifestyle products, including mobile smartphones and feature phones, portable digital music
players, and other electronic devices. We have a limited operating history in these markets,
especially for mobile smartphones and feature phones, upon which you can evaluate our prospects,
which may make it difficult to predict our actual results in future periods. Actual results of our
future operations may differ materially from our anticipated results.
We currently anticipate that our human interface solutions for mobile smartphones and feature
phones will constitute an increasing portion of our net revenue. Net revenue for our human
interface solutions for mobile smartphones and feature phones was not material until the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. Our success in serving the mobile smartphone market will depend upon the
continued growth of that segment of the overall mobile phone market; the utilization of
high-functionality interactive touch screens with easy-to-use touch button controls rather than
mechanical buttons as the human interface for application access and control in those products; our
ability to demonstrate to mobile smartphone OEMs, including those with which we have had no prior
relationship, the advantages of our human interface solutions in terms of performance, size,
durability, power consumption, and industrial design possibilities, and the success of OEMs
products utilizing our human interface solutions.
Market acceptance of our customers existing or new products that utilize our human interface
solution may decline or may not develop and, as a result, our sales may decline or may not
increase.
We do not sell any products to end users. Instead, we design various human interface
solutions that our OEM customers incorporate into their products. As a result, our success depends
almost entirely upon the widespread market acceptance of our OEM customers products. We do not
control or influence the manufacture, promotion, distribution, or pricing of the products that
incorporate our human interface solutions. Instead, we depend on our customers to manufacture and
distribute products incorporating our human interface solutions and to generate consumer demand
through marketing and promotional activities. Even if our technologies successfully meet our
customers price and performance goals, our sales would decline or fail to develop if our customers
do not achieve commercial success in selling their products that incorporate our human interface
solutions.
Competitive advances by OEMs in the PC or digital lifestyle product markets, which do not
utilize our human interface solutions broadly in their product offerings, at the expense of our
other OEM customers could result in lost sales opportunities. Within the digital lifestyle product
market, the mobile smartphone is becoming an increasingly important factor in our operating
results. Any failure to expand our presence in this market, a significant slowdown in the use of
our human interface solutions by our customers in this market, the reduced demand for our
customers products, or a slowdown in this market would adversely affect our sales.
If we fail to maintain and build relationships with our customers and do not continue to satisfy
our customers, we may lose future sales and our revenue may stagnate or decline.
Because our success depends on the widespread market acceptance of our customers products, we
must continue to maintain our relationships with the leading notebook computer and portable digital
music player OEMs and expand our relationships with mobile smartphone OEMs. In addition, we must
identify areas of significant growth potential in other markets, establish relationships with OEMs
in those markets, and assist those OEMs in developing products that use our interface technologies.
Our failure to identify potential growth opportunities,
17
particularly in the mobile smartphone market, or establish and maintain relationships with
OEMs in those markets, would prevent our business from growing in those markets.
Our ability to meet the expectations of our customers requires us to provide innovative human
interface solutions for customers on a timely and cost-effective basis and to maintain customer
satisfaction with our human interface solutions. We must match our design and production capacity
with customer demand, maintain satisfactory delivery schedules, and meet performance goals. If we
are unable to achieve these goals for any reason, our customers could reduce their purchases from
us and our sales would decline or fail to develop.
Our customer relationships also can be affected by factors affecting our customers that are
unrelated to our performance. These factors can include a myriad of situations, including business
reversals of customers, determinations by customers to change their product mix or abandon business
segments, or mergers, consolidations, or acquisitions involving our customers, such as the
combination of Compaq and Hewlett-Packard or the acquisition of IBMs PC business unit by Lenovo.
One customer accounted for 10% of our net revenue in fiscal 2008, and the loss of revenue from this
customer could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Sales to one customer that provides contract manufacturing services to major OEMs accounted
for 10% of our net revenue for the fiscal ended June 30, 2008, and two customers accounted for an
aggregate of 26% of our net revenue for the fiscal ended June 30, 2007. This customer was Zhan Yun
Shanghai Electronics in fiscal 2008, and the customers were Compal and Wistron in fiscal 2007.
Additionally, receivables from each of S-Mac and Zhan Yun Shanghai Electronics exceeded 10% of
accounts receivable and in the aggregate represented 24% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2008.
Compal, Hon Hai, Inventec, Kang Zhun Electronics, Shanghai Yi Hsin, S-Mac, Wistron, and Zhan
Yun Shanghai Electronics are some of the contract manufacturers that serve our OEM customers. Any
material delay, cancellation, or reduction of orders from any one or more of these contract
manufacturers or the OEMs they serve could harm our business, financial condition, and results of
operations. The adverse effect would be more substantial if our other customers do not increase
their orders or if we are unsuccessful in generating orders for human interface solutions from new
customers. Many of these contract manufacturers sell to the same OEMs, and therefore our
concentration with certain OEMs may be higher than with any individual contract manufacturer.
Concentration in our customer base may make fluctuations in revenue and earnings more severe and
make business planning more difficult.
We rely on others for our production and any interruptions of these arrangements could disrupt our
ability to fill our customers orders.
We utilize contract manufacturers for all of our production requirements. The majority of our
manufacturing is conducted in China, Taiwan, and Thailand by contract manufacturers that also
perform services for numerous other companies. We do not have a guaranteed level of production
capacity with any of our contract manufacturers. Qualifying new contract manufacturers, and
specifically semiconductor foundries, is time consuming and might result in unforeseen
manufacturing and operations problems. The loss of our relationships with our contract
manufacturers or assemblers or their inability to conduct their manufacturing and assembly services
for us as anticipated in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness could adversely affect our ability
to fill customer orders in accordance with required delivery, quality, and performance
requirements. If this were to occur, the resulting decline in revenue would harm our business.
We depend on third parties to maintain satisfactory manufacturing yields and delivery schedules,
and their inability to do so could increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, and result in our
inability to deliver our products, which would adversely affect our results of operations.
We depend on our contract manufacturers to maintain high levels of productivity and
satisfactory delivery schedules at manufacturing and assembly facilities located primarily in
China, Taiwan, and Thailand. We provide our contract manufacturers with six-month rolling
forecasts of our production requirements. We do not, however, have long-term agreements with any
of our contract manufacturers that guarantee production capacity, prices, lead times, or delivery
schedules. Our contract manufacturers serve other customers, a number of which have greater
production requirements than we do. As a result, our contract manufacturers could determine to
prioritize
18
production capacity for other customers or reduce or eliminate deliveries to us on short
notice. At times, we have experienced lower than anticipated manufacturing yields and lengthening
of delivery schedules. Lower than expected manufacturing yields could increase our costs or
disrupt our supplies. We may encounter lower manufacturing yields and longer delivery schedules in
commencing volume production of our new products that we introduce. Any of these problems could
result in our inability to deliver our product solutions in a timely manner and adversely affect
our operating results.
Shortages of components and materials may delay or reduce our sales and increase our costs, thereby
harming our results of operations.
The inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and other materials necessary for
the production of our products could result in reduced or delayed sales or lost orders. Any delay
in or loss of sales could adversely impact our operating results. Many of the materials used in
the production of our products are available only from a limited number of foreign suppliers,
particularly suppliers located in Asia. In most cases, neither we nor our contract manufacturers
have long-term supply contracts with these suppliers. As a result, we are subject to economic
instability in these Asian countries as well as to increased costs, supply interruptions, and
difficulties in obtaining materials. Our customers also may encounter difficulties or increased
costs in obtaining the materials necessary to produce their products into which our product
solutions are incorporated.
From time to time, materials and components used in our product solutions or in other aspects
of our customers products have been subject to allocation because of shortages of these materials
and components. Shortages in the future could cause delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction,
and lower revenue.
We are subject to lengthy development periods and product acceptance cycles, which can result in
development and engineering costs without any future revenue.
We provide human interface solutions that are incorporated by OEMs into the products they
sell. OEMs make the determination during their product development programs whether to incorporate
our human interface solutions or pursue other alternatives. This process requires us to make
significant investments of time and resources in the design of human interface solutions well
before our customers introduce their products incorporating these interfaces and before we can be
sure that we will generate any significant sales to our customers or even recover our investment.
During a customers entire product development process, we face the risk that our interfaces will
fail to meet our customers technical, performance, or cost requirements or that our products will
be replaced by competitive products or alternative technological solutions. Even if we complete
our design process in a manner satisfactory to our customer, the customer may delay or terminate
its product development efforts. The occurrence of any of these events could cause sales to not
materialize, to be deferred, or to be cancelled, which would adversely affect our operating
results.
We do not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, and their ability to cancel,
reduce, or delay orders could reduce our revenue and increase our costs.
Our customers do not provide us with firm, long-term volume purchase commitments, but instead
issue purchase orders. As a result, customers can cancel purchase orders or reduce or delay orders
at any time. The cancellation, delay, or reduction of customer purchase orders could result in
reduced revenue, excess inventory, and unabsorbed overhead. We have an established presence in the
notebook computer market and have only recently established a presence in the digital lifestyle
products markets. Our success in the digital lifestyle product markets, including those for mobile
smartphones and feature phones and portable digital music players, will require us to establish the
value added by our products to OEMs that have traditionally used other solutions. All of the
markets we serve are subject to severe competitive pressures, rapid technological change, and
product obsolescence, which increase our inventory and overhead risks, resulting in increased
costs.
We face intense competition that could result in our losing or failing to gain market share and
suffering reduced revenue.
We serve intensely competitive markets that are characterized by price erosion, rapid
technological change, and competition from major domestic and international companies. This
intense competition could result in pricing pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower
market share. Any movement away from high-quality, custom designed, feature-rich human interface
solutions to lower priced alternatives would adversely affect our business.
19
Some of our competitors, particularly in the markets for digital lifestyle products and other
electronic devices, have greater market recognition, larger customer bases, and substantially
greater financial, technical, marketing, distribution, and other resources than we possess and that
afford them competitive advantages. As a result, they may be able to devote greater resources to
the promotion and sale of products, to negotiate lower prices for raw materials and components, to
deliver competitive products at lower prices, and to introduce new product solutions and respond to
customer requirements more quickly than we can. Our competitive position could suffer if one or
more of our customers determine not to utilize our custom engineered, total solutions approach and
instead decide to design and manufacture their own interfaces, to contract with our competitors, or
to use alternative technologies.
Our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, both within and outside
our control. These factors include the following:
|
|
|
our success in designing and introducing new human interface solutions, including
those implementing new technologies; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to predict the evolving needs of our customers and to assist them in
incorporating our technologies into their new products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet our customers requirements for low power consumption, ease of
use, reliability, durability, and small form factor; |
|
|
|
|
the quality of our customer services; |
|
|
|
|
the rate at which customers incorporate our human interface solutions into their own
products; |
|
|
|
|
product or technology introductions by our competitors; and |
|
|
|
|
foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause a foreign competitors products to be
priced significantly lower than our product solutions. |
If we do not keep pace with technological innovations, our products may not be competitive and our
revenue and operating results may suffer.
We operate in rapidly changing markets. Technological advances, the introduction of new
products, and new design techniques could adversely affect our business unless we are able to adapt
to the changing conditions. Technological advances could render our solutions obsolete, and we may
not be able to respond effectively to the technological requirements of evolving markets. As a
result, we will be required to expend substantial funds for and commit significant resources to
|
|
|
continue research and development activities on existing and potential human
interface solutions, |
|
|
|
|
hire additional engineering and other technical personnel, and |
|
|
|
|
purchase advanced design tools and test equipment. |
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to develop and utilize new technologies that
address the needs of our customers, or our competitors or customers do so more effectively than we
do.
Our efforts to develop new technologies may not result in commercial success, which could cause a
decline in our revenue and could harm our business.
Our research and development efforts with respect to new technologies may not result in
customer or market acceptance. Some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the
transition from the research and development lab to cost-effective production as a result of
technology problems, competitive cost issues, yield problems, and other factors. Even when we
successfully complete a research and development effort with respect to a particular technology,
our customers may decide not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the technology for a
variety of reasons, including the following:
20
|
|
|
difficulties with other suppliers of components for the products, |
|
|
|
|
superior technologies developed by our competitors and unfavorable comparisons of our
solutions with these technologies, |
|
|
|
|
price considerations, and |
|
|
|
|
lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products. |
The nature of our business requires us to make continuing investments for new technologies.
Significant expenses relating to one or more new technologies that ultimately prove to be
unsuccessful for any reason could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, any
investments or acquisitions made to enhance our technologies may prove to be unsuccessful. If our
efforts are unsuccessful, our business could be harmed.
We may not be able to enhance our existing product solutions and develop new product solutions in a
timely manner.
Our future operating results will depend to a significant extent on our ability to continue to
provide new human interface solutions that compare favorably with alternative solutions on the
basis of time to introduction, cost, performance, and end user preferences. Our success in
maintaining existing and attracting new customers and developing new business depends on various
factors, including the following:
|
|
|
innovative development of new solutions for customer products, |
|
|
|
|
utilization of advances in technology, |
|
|
|
|
maintenance of quality standards, |
|
|
|
|
efficient and cost-effective solutions, and |
|
|
|
|
timely completion of the design and introduction of new human interface solutions. |
We recently introduced our OneTouch product offering to enable our customers to access our
technologies to develop their own human interface designs for capacitive buttons and scrolling
applications for products such as mobile smartphones and feature phones, portable digital music and
video players, and notebook peripherals. OneTouch may not enable us to achieve our goal of
increasing our business with existing customers or attracting new customers. In addition, OneTouch
could reduce demand for our custom-designed human interface solutions.
Our inability to enhance our existing product solutions and develop new product solutions on a
timely basis could harm our operating results and impede our growth.
A technologically new human interface solution that achieves significant market share could harm
our business.
Our human interface solutions are designed to integrate touch, handwriting, and vision
capabilities. New computing and communications devices could be developed that call for a
different interface solution. Existing devices also could be modified to allow for a different
interface solution. Our business could be harmed if our products become noncompetitive as a result
of a technological breakthrough that allows a new interface solution to displace our solutions and
achieve significant market acceptance.
International sales and manufacturing risks could adversely affect our operating results.
Our manufacturing and assembly operations are primarily conducted in China, Taiwan, and
Thailand by manufacturing contractors. We have sales and logistics operations in Hong Kong, and
sales support operations in China, Japan, Korea, Switzerland, and Taiwan. These international
operations expose us to various economic, political, and other risks that could adversely affect
our operations and operating results, including the following:
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing a multi-national organization, |
21
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, |
|
|
|
|
differing labor regulations, |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, |
|
|
|
|
tariffs and duties and other trade barrier restrictions, |
|
|
|
|
possible employee turnover or labor unrest, |
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable, |
|
|
|
|
the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws, |
|
|
|
|
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights, and |
|
|
|
|
political or economic instability in certain parts of the world. |
The risks associated with international operations could negatively affect our operating
results.
Our business may suffer if international trade is hindered, disrupted, or economically
disadvantaged.
Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect the foreign production and sale
of our products. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or foreign countries,
such as a change in the current tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other trade
policies, could adversely affect our ability to sell human interface solutions in foreign markets
and to obtain materials or equipment from foreign suppliers.
Changes in policies by the U.S. or foreign governments resulting in, among other things,
higher taxation, currency conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer of funds, or the
expropriation of private enterprises also could have a material adverse effect on us. Any actions
by countries in which we conduct business to reverse policies that encourage foreign investment or
foreign trade also could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, U.S. trade policies,
such as most favored nation status and trade preferences for certain Asian nations, could affect
the attractiveness of our services to our U.S. customers and adversely impact our operating
results.
Our operating results could be adversely affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar
against foreign currencies.
We transact business predominantly in U.S. dollars and bill and collect our sales in U.S.
dollars. A weakening of the dollar could cause our overseas vendors to require renegotiation of
either the prices or currency we pay for their goods and services. In the future, customers may
negotiate pricing and make payments in non-U.S. currencies. For fiscal 2008, approximately 5% of
our costs were denominated in non-U.S. currencies, including Hong Kong dollars, British pounds,
Taiwan dollars, Japanese yen, Korean won, Chinese yuan, and Swiss francs.
If our overseas vendors or customers require us to transact business in non-U.S. currencies,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our cost of goods, operating expenses,
and operating margins and could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency devaluation can
result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be
difficult, especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot predict the impact of future
exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results. We currently do not hedge any foreign
currencies; accordingly, we have no foreign currency hedge contracts outstanding as of the end of
our fiscal year.
A majority of our contract manufacturers are located in China, Taiwan, and Thailand increasing the
risk that a natural disaster, labor strike, war, or political unrest in those countries would
disrupt our operations.
A majority of our contract manufacturers are located in China, Taiwan, and Thailand. Events
out of our control, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, or other natural disasters, or political
unrest, war, labor strikes, or work stoppages in these countries would disrupt their operations,
which would impact our operations. The risk of earthquakes in Taiwan is significant because of its
proximity to major earthquake fault lines. An earthquake, such
22
as the one that occurred in Taiwan in September 1999, could cause significant delays in
shipments of our product solutions until we are able to shift our outsourced operations. In
addition, there is political tension between China and Taiwan that could lead to hostilities. If
any of these events occur, we may not be able to obtain alternative capacity. Failure to secure
alternative capacity could cause a delay in the shipment of our product solutions, which would
cause our revenue to fluctuate or decline.
Variability of customer requirements resulting in cancellations, reductions, or delays may
adversely affect our operating results.
We must provide increasingly rapid product turnaround and respond to ever-shorter lead times.
A variety of conditions, both specific to individual customers and generally affecting the demand
for OEMs products, may cause customers to cancel, reduce, or delay orders. Cancellations,
reductions, or delays by a significant customer or by a group of customers may adversely affect our
revenue and could require us to repurchase inventory from our contract manufacturers, which could
adversely affect our costs. On occasion, customers require rapid increases in production, which
can strain our resources and reduce our margins. Although we have been able to obtain increased
production capacity from our third-party manufacturers, we may be unable to do so at any given time
to meet our customers demands if their demands exceed anticipated levels.
Our operating results may experience significant fluctuations that could result in a decline in the
price of our stock.
In addition to the variability resulting from the short-term nature of our customers
commitments, other factors contribute to significant periodic and seasonal quarterly fluctuations
in our results of operations. These factors include the following:
|
|
|
the cyclicality of the markets we serve; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and size of orders; |
|
|
|
|
order push-outs or cancellations; |
|
|
|
|
the volume of orders relative to our ability to deliver; |
|
|
|
|
product introductions and market acceptance of new products or new generations of
products; |
|
|
|
|
evolution in the life cycles of our customers products; |
|
|
|
|
timing of expenses in anticipation of future orders; |
|
|
|
|
changes in product mix; |
|
|
|
|
availability of manufacturing and assembly services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in cost and availability of labor and components; |
|
|
|
|
the expanded use of high-cost, third-party components in the products we sell; |
|
|
|
|
timely delivery of product solutions to customers; |
|
|
|
|
pricing and availability of competitive products; |
|
|
|
|
introduction of new technologies into the markets we serve; |
|
|
|
|
emergence of new competitors; |
|
|
|
|
pressures on reducing selling prices; |
|
|
|
|
the absolute and relative levels of corporate enterprise and consumer notebook
purchases; |
23
|
|
|
our success in serving new markets; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions. |
Accordingly, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons as an indicator of our future
performance. Negative or unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results may result in a
decline in the price of our stock.
If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our infrastructure, management, and resources could be
strained, our ability to effectively manage our business could be diminished, and our operating
results could suffer.
The failure to manage our growth effectively could strain our resources, which would impede
our ability to increase revenue. We have increased the number of our human interface solutions and
plan to expand further the number and diversity of our solutions and their use in the future. Our
ability to manage our planned diversification and growth effectively will require us to
|
|
|
successfully hire, train, retain, and motivate additional employees, including
employees outside the United States; |
|
|
|
|
efficiently plan and expand our facilities to meet increased headcount requirements; |
|
|
|
|
enhance our global operational, financial, and management infrastructure; and |
|
|
|
|
expand our development and production capacity. |
In connection with the expansion and diversification of our product and customer base, we are
increasing our personnel and making other expenditures to meet the increased demand we anticipate
for our expanding product offerings, including offerings in the notebook computer and digital
lifestyle markets. Increases in the demand for our products will require further expansion of our
traditional notebook computer business as well as an increasing presence in the digital lifestyle
product market, including mobile smartphones and feature phones and portable digital music and
video players. To date, our sales of human interface solutions for portable digital music and
video players and mobile smartphones and feature phones have varied significantly from quarter to
quarter. Risks are further increased because customers do not commit to firm production schedules
for more than a short time in advance. Any increase in expenses or investments in infrastructure
and facilities in anticipation of future orders that do not materialize would adversely affect our
profitability. Our customers also may require rapid increases in design and production services
that place an excessive short-term burden on our resources and the resources of our third-party
manufacturers. If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our business and results of operations
could suffer.
We depend on key personnel who would be difficult to replace, and our business will likely be
harmed if we lose their services or cannot hire additional qualified personnel.
Our success depends substantially on the efforts and abilities of our senior management and
other key personnel. The competition for qualified management and key personnel, especially
engineers, is intense. Although we maintain noncompetition and nondisclosure covenants with most
of our key personnel, we do not have employment agreements with most of them. The loss of services
of one or more of our key employees or the inability to hire, train, and retain key personnel,
especially engineers and technical support personnel, and capable sales and customer-support
employees outside the United States, could delay the development and sale of our products, disrupt
our business, and interfere with our ability to execute our business plan.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property could impair our competitive advantage, reduce
our revenue, and increase our costs.
Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability to maintain the proprietary
aspects of our technologies and products. We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade
secrets, trademarks, confidentiality agreements, and other contractual provisions to protect our
intellectual property, but these measures may provide only limited protection. We license from
third parties certain technology used in and for our products. These third-party licenses are
granted with restrictions, and there can be no assurances that such third-party
24
technology will remain available to us on terms beneficial to us. Our failure to enforce and
protect our intellectual property rights or obtain from third parties the right to use necessary
technology could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results
of operations. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights
as fully as do the laws of the United States.
Patents may not issue from the patent applications that we have filed or may file in the
future. Our issued patents may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, and claims of our
patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength, or issued in the proper geographic regions, to
provide meaningful protection or any commercial advantage. We have not applied for, and do not
have, any copyright registration on our technologies or products. We have applied to register
certain of our trademarks in the United States and other countries. There can be no assurance that
we will obtain registrations of principle or other trademarks in key markets. Failure to obtain
registrations could compromise our ability to protect fully our trademarks and brands and could
increase the risk of challenge from third parties to our use of our trademarks and brands.
We do not consistently rely on written agreements with our customers, suppliers,
manufacturers, and other recipients of our technologies and products, and therefore some trade
secret protection may be lost and our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights may be
limited. Additionally, our customers, suppliers, manufacturers, and other recipients of our
technologies and products may seek to use our technologies and products without appropriate
limitations. In the past, we did not consistently require our employees and consultants to enter
into confidentiality agreements, employment agreements, or proprietary information and invention
assignment agreements. Therefore, our former employees and consultants may try to claim some
ownership interest in our technologies and products and may use our technologies and products
competitively and without appropriate limitations.
We may be required to incur substantial expenses and divert management attention and resources in
defending intellectual property litigation against us.
We may receive notices from third parties that claim our products infringe their rights. From
time to time, we receive notice from third parties of the intellectual property rights such parties
have obtained. We cannot be certain that our technologies and products do not and will not
infringe issued patents or other proprietary rights of others. We are currently subject to an
infringement claim and this claim or any future claims, with or without merit, could result in
significant litigation costs and diversion of resources, including the attention of management, and
could require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that such licenses could be obtained on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all, or that the terms of any offered licenses would be
acceptable to us. If forced to cease using such technology, there can be no assurance that we
would be able to develop or obtain alternate technology. Accordingly, an adverse determination in
a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us
from manufacturing, using, or selling certain of our products, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Furthermore, parties making such claims could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages,
as well as injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to make,
use, or sell our products in the United States or abroad. Such a judgment could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, we
are obligated under certain agreements to indemnify the other party in connection with infringement
by us of the proprietary rights of third parties. In the event we are required to indemnify
parties under these agreements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
We may incur substantial expenses and divert management resources in prosecuting others for their
unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by frequent litigation regarding patents and
other intellectual property rights. Other companies, including our competitors, may develop
technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies, duplicate our technologies, or
design around our patents and may have or obtain patents or other proprietary rights that would
prevent, limit, or interfere with our ability to make, use, or sell our products. Effective
intellectual property protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries in which
we operate, such as China and Taiwan. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use
aspects of our technologies and products that we regard as proprietary. There can be no assurance
that our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate
or that competitors will not independently
25
develop similar technologies. If our intellectual property protection is insufficient to
protect our intellectual property rights, we could face increased competition in the market for our
technologies and products.
Should any of our competitors file patent applications or obtain patents that claim inventions
also claimed by us, we may choose to participate in an interference proceeding to determine the
right to a patent for these inventions because our business would be harmed if we fail to enforce
and protect our intellectual property rights. Even if the outcome is favorable, this proceeding
could result in substantial cost to us and disrupt our business.
In the future, we also may need to file lawsuits to enforce our intellectual property rights,
to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. This litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and
diversion of resources, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
If we become subject to product returns and product liability claims resulting from defects in our
products, we may fail to achieve market acceptance of our products and our business could be
harmed.
We develop complex products in an evolving marketplace and generally warrant our products for
a period of 12 months or more from the date of sale. Despite testing by us and our customers,
defects may be found in existing or new products. In fiscal 2001, a manufacturing error of one of
our contract manufacturers was discovered. Although the error was promptly discovered without
significant interruption of supply and the contract manufacturer rectified the problem at its own
cost, any such manufacturing errors or product defects could result in a delay in recognition or
loss of revenue, loss of market share, or failure to achieve market acceptance. Additionally,
these defects could result in financial or other damages to our customers; cause us to incur
significant warranty, support, and repair costs; and divert the attention of our engineering
personnel from key product development efforts. In such circumstances, our customers could also
seek and obtain damages from us for their losses. A product liability claim brought against us,
even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly to defend. The occurrence of these
problems would likely harm our business.
Potential strategic alliances may not achieve their objectives, and the failure to do so could
impede our growth.
We anticipate that we will enter into strategic alliances. Among other matters, we
continually explore strategic alliances designed to enhance or complement our technology or to work
in conjunction with our technology; to provide necessary know-how, components, or supplies; and to
develop, introduce, and distribute products utilizing our technology. Any strategic alliances may
not achieve their intended objectives, and parties to our strategic alliances may not perform as
contemplated. The failure of these alliances may impede our ability to introduce new products and
enter new markets.
Any acquisitions that we undertake could be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute
stockholder value, and harm our operating results.
We expect to pursue opportunities to acquire other businesses and technologies in order to
complement our current human interface solutions, expand the breadth of our markets, enhance our
technical capabilities, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. While we have no current
definitive agreements underway, we may acquire businesses, products, or technologies in the future.
If we make any future acquisitions, we could issue stock that would dilute existing stockholders
percentage ownership, incur substantial debt, assume contingent liabilities, or experience higher
operating expenses. Our experience in acquiring other businesses and technologies is limited.
Potential acquisitions also involve numerous risks, including the following:
|
|
|
problems assimilating the purchased operations, technologies, or products; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core businesses; |
|
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with entering markets in which we have little or no prior
experience; and |
26
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations. |
We cannot assure you that we would be successful in overcoming problems encountered in
connection with any acquisitions, and our inability to do so could disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our business.
Our target markets are cyclical and may result in fluctuations in our operating results.
The PC and electronics industries have experienced significant economic downturns at various
times. These downturns are characterized by diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of
average selling prices, and production overcapacity. In addition, the PC and electronics
industries are cyclical in nature. We seek to reduce our exposure to industry downturns and
cyclicality by providing design and production services for leading companies in rapidly expanding
industry segments. We may, however, experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future
operating results because of general industry conditions or events occurring in the general
economy.
The valuation of our technology conducted in connection with our international operating structure
may be challenged, which could result in additional taxes, interest, and penalties.
In fiscal 2005, we implemented an international operating structure. Under this structure,
generally, one of our affiliates licensed from us certain rights to the pre-existing and in-process
technology associated with our products for exploitation in all geographic markets except the U.S.,
Japanese, and Korean markets, which we refer to as ROW markets. Our affiliate also acquired
ownership of all future economic rights to product sales in ROW markets by entering into an
agreement to license certain intangibles and a cost-sharing agreement under which we and our
affiliate will share research and development costs in accordance with certain tax rules and
regulations. We believe this structure appropriately reflects where our profits are generated and
may result in future tax advantages to us, but there can be no assurances that this will be the
case.
We expect to incur additional expenses in complying with corporate governance and public disclosure
requirements.
Changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public
disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations, and Nasdaq Global Select
Market rules, are creating uncertainty and increased expenses for companies such as ours. These
new or changed laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many
cases due to their lack of specificity and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve
over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in
continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing
revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining high standards
of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving
laws, regulations, and standards have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in,
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. In particular, our efforts to comply with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related regulations regarding our required
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and our external auditors audit of our
internal controls over financial reporting has required the commitment of significant financial and
managerial resources. We expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of significant
resources. In addition, it has become more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director
and officer liability insurance. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining
qualified board members, which could harm our business. If our efforts to comply with new or
changed laws, regulations, and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or
governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.
The accounting requirements for income taxes on certain of our share-based awards will subject our
future quarterly and annual effective tax rates to greater volatility and, consequently, our
ability to estimate reasonably our future quarterly and annual effective tax rates is greatly
diminished.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit upon expensing nonqualified stock
options and deferred stock units issued under our share-based compensation plans. However, under
current accounting standards, we cannot recognize tax benefit concurrent with expensing incentive
stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares (qualified stock options) issued under our
share-based compensation plans. For qualified stock options that vested after our adoption of SFAS
123R, we recognize tax benefit only in the period when disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock occur and, for qualified stock options that vested prior to our adoption of SFAS
27
123R, the tax benefit is recorded directly to additional paid-in capital. Accordingly,
because we cannot recognize the tax benefit for share-based compensation expense associated with
qualified stock options until the occurrence of future disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock and such disqualified dispositions may happen in periods when our stock price substantially
increases, and because a portion of that tax benefit may be directly recorded to additional paid-in
capital, our future quarterly and annual effective tax rates will be subject to greater volatility
and, consequently, our ability to estimate reasonably our future quarterly and annual effective tax
rates is greatly diminished.
Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse unexpected
fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices could have a significant effect on our reported
results of operations. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting
pronouncements have occurred in the past and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or
the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way
we conduct our business. For example, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 123R
requiring us to recognize all share-based payments to employees, including grants of stock options,
in the financial statements based on their grant date fair value eliminating the pro forma footnote
disclosures that were allowed as an alternative to financial statement recognition. This
requirement, while not affecting our cash flow, adversely affected our reported financial results
and impaired our ability to provide guidance on our future reported financial results as a result
of the variability of the factors used to establish the grant date fair value of stock options and
the accounting for income taxes thereon.
We increased our leverage as a result of the sale of our 0.75% convertible senior subordinated
notes.
As a result of the sale of our 0.75% convertible senior subordinated notes in fiscal 2005, we
incurred $125 million of indebtedness. As a result of this indebtedness, our interest payment
obligations have increased. Our interest payment obligations on the notes is approximately
$938,000 annually. The degree to which we are now leveraged could have adverse consequences,
including the following:
|
|
|
a limitation on our ability to obtain future financing for working capital,
acquisitions, or other purposes; |
|
|
|
|
an increase in our vulnerability to industry downturns and competitive pressures; and |
|
|
|
|
a possible competitive disadvantage with less leveraged competitors and competitors
that may have better access to capital resources. |
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend upon our future performance,
which will be subject to the financial, business, and other factors affecting our operations, many
of which are beyond our control.
We made an irrevocable election to cash settle the $125 million principal amount of our convertible
senior subordinated notes in April 2007. If we do not have sufficient cash resources when
settlement occurs we may be in breach of our obligation or we may be required to borrow cash to
meet our obligation.
We made an irrevocable election to cash settle the $125 million principal amount of our
convertible senior subordinated notes in April 2007. If we do not have sufficient cash resources
when settlement occurs, we may be in breach of our obligation or we may be required to borrow cash
to meet our obligation, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.
Currently our investments in auction rate securities, or ARS, are not liquid. If the issuers are
not able to meet their payment obligations or if we sell our ARS investments before they recover,
we may lose some or all of our principal invested or may be required to further reduce the carrying
value.
As of June 30, 2008, we had $47.4 million invested in ARS for which the auctions have failed
and our investments are not liquid. The carrying value of these investments is $37.9 million
reflecting $2.5 million of temporary impairment and $7.0 million of other-than-temporary
impairment. If the issuers are not able to meet their payment obligations or if we sell our ARS
investments before they recover, we may lose some or all of the principal
28
invested or may be required to further reduce the carrying value. This would adversely affect
our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Legislation affecting the markets in which we compete could adversely affect our ability to
implement our growth strategies.
Our ability to expand our business may be adversely impacted by future laws or regulations.
Our customers products may be subject to laws relating to environmental regulations,
communications, encryption technology, electronic commerce, e-signatures, and privacy. Any of
these laws could be expensive to comply with, and the marketability of our products could be
adversely affected.
We must finance the growth of our business and the development of new products, which could have an
adverse effect on our operating results.
To remain competitive, we must continue to make significant investments in research and
development, marketing, and business development. Our failure to increase sufficiently our net
revenue to offset these increased costs would adversely affect our operating results.
From time to time, we may seek additional equity or debt financing to provide for funds
required to expand our business. We cannot predict the timing or amount of any such requirements
at this time. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to expand
our business or to develop new business at the rate desired and our operating results may suffer.
Debt financing increases expenses and must be repaid regardless of operating results. Equity
financing could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders.
Continuing uncertainty of the U.S. and global economy may have serious implications for the growth
and stability of our business and may negatively affect our stock price.
The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends significantly on the overall
demand in the notebook computer market and in the markets for digital lifestyle products and other
electronic devices. Softening demand in these markets caused by ongoing economic uncertainty may
result in decreased revenue or earnings levels or growth rates. The U.S. and global economy has
been historically cyclical, and market conditions continue to be challenging, which has resulted in
individuals and companies delaying or reducing expenditures. Further delays or reductions in
spending could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products, and consequently on our
business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, and stock price.
The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to wide
fluctuations in response to various factors, including the following:
|
|
|
variations in our quarterly results; |
|
|
|
|
the financial guidance we may provide to the public, any changes in such guidance, or
our failure to meet such guidance; |
|
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by industry or securities analysts or our failure to
meet such estimates; |
|
|
|
|
various market factors or perceived market factors, including rumors, whether or not
correct, involving us, our customers, our suppliers, or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations by us or by our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
introductions of new products or new pricing policies by us or by our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or by our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel; |
29
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant orders; |
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers; |
|
|
|
|
market conditions in our industry, the industries of our customers, and the economy
as a whole; |
|
|
|
|
hedging activities by investors holding positions in our convertible senior
subordinated notes; |
|
|
|
|
short positions held by investors; and |
|
|
|
|
general financial market conditions or occurrences. |
In addition, stocks of technology companies have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate to these companies operating
performance. Public announcements by technology companies concerning, among other things, their
performance, accounting practices, or legal problems could cause the market price of our common
stock to decline regardless of our actual operating performance.
Our charter documents and Delaware law could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
us, and discourage a takeover.
Our certificate of incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law contain provisions
that may have the effect of making more difficult or delaying attempts by others to obtain control
of our company, even when these attempts may be in the best interests of our stockholders. Our
certificate of incorporation also authorizes our board of directors, without stockholder approval,
to issue one or more series of preferred stock, which could have voting and conversion rights that
adversely affect or dilute the voting power of the holders of common stock. Delaware law also
imposes conditions on certain business combination transactions with interested stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation divides our Board of Directors into three classes, with one class
to stand for election each year for a three-year term after the initial election. The
classification of directors tends to discourage a third party from initiating a proxy solicitation
or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our company and may maintain the incumbency of our
Board of Directors, as this structure generally increases the difficulty of, or may delay,
replacing a majority of directors. Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of
Directors to fill vacancies or newly created directorships. A majority of the directors then in
office may elect a successor to fill any vacancies or newly created directorships.
Our stockholders rights plan may adversely affect existing stockholders.
Our stockholders rights plan may have the effect of deterring, delaying, or preventing a
change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. In general,
stock purchase rights issued under the rights plan become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or exchange offer of 15% or more of our
common stock is announced or commenced. After any such event, our other stockholders may purchase
additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the then-current market price. The rights will
cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved
by our board of directors. The rights should not interfere with any merger or other business
combination approved by our board of directors as the rights may be redeemed by us at $0.01 per
stock purchase right at any time before any person or group acquires 15% or more of our outstanding
common stock. The rights expire in August 2012.
Sales of large numbers of shares could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
As of August 15, 2008, all of the 33,686,446 shares (adjusted for 3-for-2 stock-split) of our
common stock outstanding are eligible for resale in the public markets. Of these shares, 8,233,110
shares (adjusted for 3-for-2 stock-split) held by affiliates are eligible for resale in the public
markets subject to compliance with the volume and manner of sale rules of Rule 144 or 701 under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the balance of the shares are eligible for resale in the
public markets as unrestricted shares. In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, any
person (or persons whose shares are aggregated for purposes of Rule 144) who beneficially owns
restricted securities with respect to which at least six months has elapsed since the later of the
date the shares were acquired from us, or from an affiliate of ours, is entitled to sell within any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then
outstanding shares of our common stock or the average weekly trading volume in common stock during
the four calendar weeks preceding such sale. Sales under Rule 144 also are subject
30
to certain manner-of-sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of
current public information about us.
Rule 701, as currently in effect, permits our employees, officers, directors, and consultants
who purchase shares pursuant to a written compensatory plan or contract to resell these shares in
reliance upon Rule 144, but without compliance with specific restrictions. Rule 701 provides that
affiliates may sell their Rule 701 shares under Rule 144 without complying with the holding period
requirement and that non-affiliates may sell their shares in reliance on Rule 144 without complying
with the holding period, public information, volume limitation, or notice provisions of Rule 144.
Sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public market could adversely affect prevailing
market prices.
We have registered an aggregate of $100 million of common stock and preferred stock for
issuance in connection with acquisitions, which shares generally will be freely tradeable after
their issuance under Rule 145 of the Securities Act, unless held by an affiliate of the acquired
company, in which case such shares will be subject to the volume and manner of sale restrictions of
Rule 144 discussed above. The issuance or subsequent sale of these shares in the public market
could adversely affect prevailing market prices.
We have registered an aggregate of $125 million of our 0.75% Convertible Senior Subordinated
Notes due 2024 and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. The shares issued upon
conversion generally will be freely tradeable after their issuance, unless held by an affiliate, in
which case such shares will be subject to the volume and manner of sale restrictions of Rule 144
discussed above. The issuance or subsequent sale of these shares in the public market could
negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
We have registered for offer and sale the shares of common stock that are reserved for
issuance pursuant to our outstanding share-based compensation plans. Shares issued after the
effective date of such registration statements in connection with our share-based compensation
plans generally will be eligible for sale in the public market, except that affiliates will
continue to be subject to volume limitations and other requirements of Rule 144. The issuance or
subsequent sale of such shares could depress the market price of our common stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices as well as our principal research, development, sales,
marketing, and administrative functions are located in our 70,000 square foot facility in Santa
Clara, California. We plan to lease additional space in close proximity to our principal facility
to support the expansion of our operations. Our Asia/Pacific headquarters are located in Hong Kong
where we lease approximately 16,000 square feet. We also maintain approximately 10,000 square feet
of office space in Taiwan, approximately 4,600 square feet of office space in China, approximately
3500 square feet of office space in Japan, 2,500 square feet of office space in Korea, and less
than 1,000 square feet of office space in Switzerland. We have satellite sales support offices in
Singapore, Thailand, and Texas.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In March 2006, Elantech Devices Corporation, or Elantech, filed a Complaint for Patent
Infringement against us claiming that we infringed one of its patents and seeking damages,
attorneys fees, and a permanent injunction against us infringing or inducing others to infringe
the patent. In April 2006, we filed our Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaims against Elantech,
claiming that Elantech has infringed and induced infringement of four of our patents and seeking
damages, attorneys fees, and a permanent injunction against infringing or inducing others to
infringe.
Elantech responded to our counterclaim denying liability and counterclaimed seeking an
injunction and damages for alleged violations of California law. We subsequently filed a motion to
dismiss the Elantech counterclaims that was granted in July 2006 with leave to amend the
counterclaims after the adjudication of the patent infringement claims.
31
The Elantech patent relates to recognizing and providing an indication of the presence of
multiple fingers on a touchpad. We have previously developed additional ways to detect multiple
fingers and have our own related patents. The Elantech infringement claims involve two versions of
our software code (Type 1 Code and Type 2 Code) in certain products in which multiple finger
detection is enabled.
In October 2007, the Court heard oral arguments on our motion for summary judgment of
noninfringement of the Elantech patent and Elantechs cross-motion for summary judgment of
infringement. The Court granted our motion for partial summary judgment of noninfringement as to
products containing Type 1 Code and denied our motion for partial summary judgment of
noninfringement as to products containing Type 2 Code. In addition, the Court denied Elantechs
motion for summary judgment that our Type 1 and Type 2 Codes infringe Elantechs intellectual
property. The Court indicated, however, that it would grant summary judgment of infringement for
products implementing the Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting functionality.
In November 2007, Elantech moved for partial summary judgment that products implementing the
Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting functionality infringe the Elantech patent. In December
2007, Elantech moved for entry of a preliminary injunction against us importing, using, selling, or
offering to sell certain products implementing the Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting
functionality.
In December 2007, we filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement against Elantech claiming that
Elantech infringed one of our patents relating to detecting the presence of multiple fingers on a
touchpad and seeking damages, attorneys fees, and an injunction. In January 2008, we moved for
entry of summary judgment for infringement of the four Synaptics patents.
In March 2008, the Court, based on its infringement ruling, filed an order preliminarily
enjoining us from making, using, selling, or importing into or offering to sell within the United
States touchpad products containing our Type 2 firmware code with enabled multiple finger counting
functionality. We do not believe any aspect of the Courts decision will have a material effect on
our business. We are not shipping any products that utilize the contested code. As a result, the
preliminary injunction will have no impact on us, our business, or our customers. Although the
contested code is no longer used in our products, we do not believe the contested code infringes
the Elantech patent and we have appealed the Courts infringement ruling.
In April 2008, the Court granted our motion for partial summary judgment holding that use of
the corner tap, scrolling, edge motion, and drag features of Elantechs touchpad products infringe
four of our patents. We intend to vigorously defend our patents and pursue our counterclaims.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
32
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information on Common Stock
Our common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (formerly on the Nasdaq
National Market) under the symbol SYNA since January 29, 2002. Prior to that time, there was no
public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the
high and low sales prices of our common stock as quoted on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
Year ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter(1) |
|
$ |
17.25 |
|
|
$ |
12.38 |
|
Second quarter(1) |
|
$ |
20.13 |
|
|
$ |
14.89 |
|
Third quarter(1) |
|
$ |
21.39 |
|
|
$ |
15.17 |
|
Fourth quarter(1) |
|
$ |
24.17 |
|
|
$ |
16.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter(1) |
|
$ |
33.46 |
|
|
$ |
23.15 |
|
Second quarter(1) |
|
$ |
41.15 |
|
|
$ |
27.06 |
|
Third quarter(1) |
|
$ |
29.97 |
|
|
$ |
14.69 |
|
Fourth quarter(1) |
|
$ |
31.89 |
|
|
$ |
15.74 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock
dividend to each stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
On August 15, 2008, the closing sales price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market was $32.40 per share as adjusted for the 3-for-2 stock split.
Stockholders
As of August 15, 2008, there were approximately 250 holders of record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently plan to
retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business or purchase shares under our common stock
purchase program rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future
will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, and capital requirements as well as
other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.
Our revolving line of credit also places restrictions on the payment of any dividends.
33
Share-Based Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information, as of June 30, 2008, with respect to our common
stock that may be issued from both stockholder approved and unapproved plans upon delivery of
shares for deferred stock units, exercise of outstanding stock options, the weighted average
exercise price of outstanding stock options, and the number of securities available for future
issuance under our various share-based compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
Number of |
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
Securities to |
|
Number of |
|
(c) |
|
Remaining Available |
|
|
be Issued |
|
Securities to |
|
Weighted- |
|
for Future Issuance |
|
|
Upon |
|
be Issued |
|
Average |
|
Under Share-Based |
|
|
Delivery of |
|
Upon |
|
Exercise |
|
Compensation Plans(2) |
|
|
Shares for |
|
Exercise of |
|
Price of |
|
[Excluding Securities |
|
|
Deferred |
|
Outstanding |
|
Outstanding |
|
Reflected in Columns |
Plan Category |
|
Stock Units(2) |
|
Options(2) |
|
Options(2) |
|
(a) and (b)] |
Share-Based
Compensation
Plans Approved by
Stockholders |
|
|
573,447 |
|
|
|
6,125,775 |
|
|
$ |
17.58 |
|
|
|
4,683,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation
Plans Not Approved
By Stockholders(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
|
56,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
573,447 |
|
|
|
6,148,275 |
|
|
$ |
17.52 |
|
|
|
4,740,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents options granted under our 2000 nonstatutory stock option plan. The plan was
adopted by our board of directors in September 2000 and provides for the grant of options
to purchase up to 300,000 shares of our common stock. Unless terminated earlier by our
board of directors, the plan will terminate in September 2010. The exercise price of
options granted under the plan is the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant. Generally, the shares subject to options granted under the plan vest 25% on the
first anniversary of the option grant date and 1/48th in each month thereafter. The
exercise price for any options granted under the plan may be paid in cash, in shares of our
common stock valued at fair market value on the exercise date, or in any other form of
legal consideration that may be acceptable to the board of directors or administrator in
their discretion, including through a same-day sale program without any cash outlay by the
optionee. The term of options granted under the plan may not exceed 10 years. Outstanding
awards and the number of shares remaining available for issuance under the plan will be
adjusted in the event of a stock split, stock dividend, or other similar change in our
capital stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock
dividend to each stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
In July 2008, our board of directors authorized an additional $80 million for our common stock
purchase program. The program authorizes us to purchase our common stock in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions depending upon market conditions and other factors. The number
of shares purchased and the timing of purchases is based on the level of our cash balances, general
business and market conditions, and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities.
Common stock purchased under this program is held as treasury stock. From April 2005 through June
30, 2008, we purchased 9,088,100 shares of our common stock in the open
34
market for an aggregate cost of $237.4 million or an average cost of $26.12 per share. Our
common stock purchase program expires in July 2010.
Purchases under common stock purchase program during the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Purchased |
|
that May |
|
|
Total |
|
Price |
|
as Part of |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Number |
|
Paid |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
per |
|
Announced |
|
Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share |
|
Program |
|
Program |
March 30, 2008 - April 26, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,088,100 |
|
|
$ |
39,255,000 |
|
April 27, 2008 - May 24, 2008 |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
36.64 |
|
|
|
9,088,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,613,000 |
|
May 25, 2008 - June 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,088,100 |
|
|
$ |
2,613,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
36.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Graph
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder returns for the five years
ended June 30, 2008 for (i) our common stock, (ii) the Nasdaq Composite Index, and (iii) the Nasdaq
Computer Index. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on June 30, 2003. The calculations of
cumulative stockholder return on the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Nasdaq Computer Index include
reinvestment of dividends. The calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our common stock
does not include reinvestment of dividends because we did not pay any dividends during the
measurement period. The historical performance shown is not necessarily indicative of future
performance.
COMPARISON OF 60 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Among Synaptics Incorporated, The Nasdaq Composite Index,
and The Nasdaq Computer Index
The performance graph above shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. The performance graph above will not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing
of our company under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
35
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents selected financial data for each fiscal year in the five-year
period ended June 30, 2008. As our past operating results are not necessarily indicative of our
future operating results the selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with Item
7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except for per share data) |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
133,276 |
|
|
$ |
208,139 |
|
|
$ |
184,557 |
|
|
$ |
266,787 |
|
|
$ |
361,057 |
|
Cost of revenue(1) |
|
|
77,244 |
|
|
|
112,090 |
|
|
|
101,704 |
|
|
|
160,913 |
|
|
|
213,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
56,032 |
|
|
|
96,049 |
|
|
|
82,853 |
|
|
|
105,874 |
|
|
|
147,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development(1) |
|
|
21,419 |
|
|
|
24,991 |
|
|
|
35,356 |
|
|
|
39,386 |
|
|
|
50,093 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative(1) |
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
18,423 |
|
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
Other operating expense (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation(2) |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill and other acquired
intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
35,939 |
|
|
|
39,942 |
|
|
|
63,375 |
|
|
|
76,548 |
|
|
|
98,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
20,093 |
|
|
|
56,107 |
|
|
|
19,478 |
|
|
|
29,326 |
|
|
|
49,232 |
|
Interest income, net |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
6,045 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
7,830 |
|
Other income or loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
20,926 |
|
|
|
58,332 |
|
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
38,431 |
|
|
|
48,788 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7,934 |
|
|
|
20,347 |
|
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
17,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
$ |
37,985 |
|
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
$ |
26,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(3) |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(3) |
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(3) |
|
|
36,627 |
|
|
|
38,604 |
|
|
|
37,062 |
|
|
|
38,337 |
|
|
|
37,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(3) |
|
|
40,662 |
|
|
|
44,642 |
|
|
|
43,613 |
|
|
|
43,596 |
|
|
|
39,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude amortization of deferred stock compensation as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
328 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Upon our adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006, we ceased amortizing deferred stock
compensation. Accordingly, no amortization of deferred stock compensation was recorded for the
years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend
to each stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
Our basic net income per share amounts for each period presented have been computed using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Our diluted net income per share
amounts for each period presented include the weighted average effect of potentially dilutive
shares. For our stock options, deferred stock units, and our convertible notes subsequent to April
2007, we use the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect. Under the treasury
stock method shares associated with our convertible notes will be included in the calculation of
diluted net income per share only if the weighted average price of our common stock on a post split
basis exceeds $33.69. We used the if converted method to determine the dilutive effect of our
convertible notes prior to April 2007 when we made an irrevocable election to cash settle the
principal upon conversion. Under the if
36
converted method 2,038,000, 3,711,000, and 3,062,000 diluted shares were included in the
calculation of diluted net income per share in fiscal 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments |
|
$ |
96,299 |
|
|
$ |
228,921 |
|
|
$ |
245,176 |
|
|
$ |
265,017 |
|
|
$ |
146,516 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
106,624 |
|
|
|
235,240 |
|
|
|
257,788 |
|
|
|
299,921 |
|
|
|
189,851 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
132,653 |
|
|
|
311,205 |
|
|
|
331,421 |
|
|
|
373,312 |
|
|
|
306,361 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
126,500 |
|
|
|
126,500 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,180 |
|
|
|
39,999 |
|
|
|
72,345 |
|
|
|
237,387 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
109,140 |
|
|
|
144,660 |
|
|
|
167,042 |
|
|
|
208,087 |
|
|
|
113,777 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Results
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial
statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results
may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a
variety of factors, including those set forth under Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Overview
We are a leading worldwide developer and supplier of custom-designed human interface solutions
that enable people to interact more easily and intuitively with a wide variety of mobile computing,
communications, entertainment, and other electronic devices. We believe our results to date
reflect the combination of our customer focus, the strength of our intellectual property, and our
engineering know-how, which allow us to develop or engineer products that meet the demanding design
specifications of OEMs.
We recognize revenue from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or title has transferred, the price is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Our net revenue increased from $133.3 million in fiscal 2004
to $361.1 million in fiscal 2008, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 28%.
In fiscal 2004, we derived 84% of our net revenue from the personal computer market. In fiscal
2008, revenue from the personal computer market accounted for 76% of our net revenue.
Many of our customers have migrated their manufacturing operations from Taiwan to China, and
many of our OEM customers have established design centers in that region. With our expanded global
presence, including offices in China, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, and the United
States, we are well positioned to provide local sales, operational, and engineering support
services to our existing customers, as well as potential new customers, on a global basis.
Our manufacturing operations are based on a variable cost model in which we outsource all of
our production requirements and primarily drop ship our products directly to our customers from our
contract manufacturers facilities, eliminating the need for significant capital expenditures and
allowing us to minimize our investment in inventories. This approach requires us to work closely
with our contract manufacturers to ensure adequate production capacity to meet our forecasted
volume requirements. We provide our contract manufacturers with six-month rolling forecasts and
issue purchase orders based on our anticipated requirements for the next 90 days. However, we do
not have any long-term supply contracts with any of our contract manufacturers. Currently, we use
two third-party wafer manufacturers to supply wafers and two third-party packaging manufacturers to
package our proprietary ASICs. In certain cases, we rely on a single source or a limited number of
suppliers to provide other key components of our products. Our cost of revenue includes all costs
associated with the production of our products, including materials, logistics, manufacturing,
assembly, and test costs paid to third-party manufacturers and related overhead costs associated
with our indirect manufacturing operations personnel.
37
Additionally, all warranty costs, yield losses, and any inventory provisions or write-downs
are charged to cost of revenue.
Our gross margin generally reflects the combination of the added value we bring to our
customers products in meeting their custom design requirements and the impact of our ongoing
cost-improvement programs. These cost-improvement programs include reducing materials and
component costs and implementing design and process improvements. Our newly introduced products
may have lower margins than our more mature products, which have realized greater benefits
associated with our ongoing cost-improvement programs. As a result, new product introductions may
initially negatively impact our gross margin.
Our research and development expenses include costs for supplies and materials related to
product development, as well as the engineering costs incurred to design human interface solutions
for customers prior to and after the customers commitment to incorporate those solutions into
their products. These expenses have generally increased, reflecting our continuing commitment to
the technological and design innovation required to maintain our position in our existing markets
and to adapt our existing technologies or develop new technologies for new markets.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses include expenses related to sales, marketing,
and administrative personnel; internal sales and outside sales representatives commissions; market
and usability research; outside legal, accounting, and consulting costs; and other marketing and
sales activities. These expenses have generally increased, primarily reflecting incremental
staffing and related support costs associated with our increased business levels, anticipated
growth in our existing markets, and penetration into new markets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, cost of revenue, inventories, product warranty,
provision for income taxes, income taxes payable, intangible assets, and contingencies. We base
our estimates on historical experience, applicable laws, and various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
The methods, estimates, interpretations, and judgments we use in applying our most critical
accounting policies can have a significant impact on the results that we report in our consolidated
financial statements. The Securities and Exchange Commission considers an entitys most critical
accounting policies to be those policies that are both most important to the portrayal of the
entitys financial condition and results of operations and those that require managements most
difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
matters that are inherently uncertain when estimated. We believe the following critical accounting
policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our
consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or title has transferred, the price is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured. We accrue for estimated sales returns and other allowances,
based on historical experience, at the time we recognize revenue. We record contract revenue for
research and development as the services are provided under the terms of the contract. We
recognize non-refundable contract fees for which no further performance obligations exist and for
which there is no continuing involvement by us on the earlier of when the payments are received or
when collection is assured.
Inventory
We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market. We base our assessment of the
ultimate realization of inventories on our projections of future demand and market conditions.
Sudden declines in demand, rapid
38
product improvements, or technological changes, or any combination of these factors can cause
us to have excess or obsolete inventories. On an ongoing basis, we review for estimated obsolete
or unmarketable inventories and write down our inventories to their net realizable value based upon
our forecasts of future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less
favorable than our forecasts, additional inventory reserves may be required. The following factors
influence our estimates: changes to or cancellations of customer orders, unexpected decline in
demand, rapid product improvements and technological advances, and termination or changes by our
OEM customers of any product offerings incorporating our product solutions.
Periodically, we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers when a customers delivery
schedule is delayed or a customers order is cancelled. In those circumstances in which our
customer has cancelled its order and we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers, we
consider a write-down to reduce the carrying value of the inventory purchased to its net realizable
value. We charge write-downs to reduce the carrying value of obsolete, slow moving, and non-usable
inventory to net realizable value to cost of revenue.
Share-Based Compensation Costs
We account for employee share-based compensation costs in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), and apply
the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment (SAB 107). We utilize
the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of employee
share-based compensatory awards, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions,
including expected volatility and expected life. Historical and implied volatilities were used in
estimating the fair value of our share-based awards, while the expected life for our options was
estimated to be five years based on historical trends since our initial public offering. Changes
in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our
share-based compensation. Further, as required under SFAS 123R, we estimate forfeitures for
share-based awards that are not expected to vest. We charge the estimated fair value less
estimated forfeitures to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the
underlying awards, which is generally four years for our stock option and deferred stock units and
up to two years for our employee stock purchase plan.
The Black-Scholes option pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. As our stock option
and employee stock purchase plan awards have characteristics that differ significantly from traded
options, and as changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value,
our estimate of fair value may not accurately represent the value assigned by a third party in an
arms-length transaction. There currently is no market-based mechanism to verify the reliability
and accuracy of the estimates derived from the Black-Scholes option pricing model or other
allowable valuation models, nor is there a means to compare and adjust the estimates to actual
values. While our estimate of fair value and the associated charge to earnings materially affects
our results of operations, it has no impact on our cash position.
The guidance in SFAS 123R and SAB 107 is relatively new, and the application of these
principles may be subject to further interpretation and guidance. There are significant variations
among allowable valuation models, and there is a possibility that we may adopt a different
valuation model or refine the inputs and assumptions under our current valuation model in the
future, resulting in a lack of consistency in future periods. Our current or future valuation
model and the inputs and assumptions we make may also lack comparability to other companies that
use different models, inputs, or assumptions, and the resulting differences in comparability could
be material.
Income Taxes
We recognize federal, foreign, and state current tax liabilities or assets based on our
estimate of taxes payable or refundable in the then current fiscal year for each tax jurisdiction.
We also recognize federal, foreign, and state deferred tax liabilities or assets for our estimate
of future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards and record a
valuation allowance to reduce any deferred tax assets by the amount of any tax benefits that, based
on available evidence and our judgment, are not expected to be realized. If our assumptions, and
consequently our estimates, change in the future, the valuation allowance we have established for
our deferred tax assets may be changed, which could impact income tax expense.
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), at the beginning of the first quarter of
fiscal 2008. FIN 48 contains a two-
39
step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance
with FIN 48. The first step is to determine when it is more-likely-than-not that a tax position
will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation
processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than
50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. The calculation of
tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the
application of highly complex tax laws. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner inconsistent
with our expectations could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial
condition. We believe we have adequately provided for reasonably foreseeable outcomes in
connection with the resolution of income tax uncertainties. However, our results have in the past,
and could in the future, include favorable and unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax
liabilities in the period a determination of such estimated tax liability is made or resolved, upon
the filing of an amended return, upon a change in facts, circumstances, or interpretation, or upon
the expiration of a statute of limitation. Accordingly, our effective tax rate could fluctuate
materially from period to period.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit upon expensing nonqualified stock
options and deferred stock units issued under our share-based compensation plans. However, under
current accounting standards, we cannot recognize tax benefit concurrent with expensing incentive
stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares (qualified stock options) issued under our
share-based compensation plans. For qualified stock options that vested after our adoption of SFAS
123R, we recognize tax benefit only in the period when disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock occur, which historically has been up to several years after vesting and in a period when our
stock price substantially increases. For qualified stock options that vested prior to our adoption
of SFAS 123R, the tax benefit is recorded directly to additional paid-in capital. Accordingly,
because we cannot recognize the tax benefit for share-based compensation expense associated with
qualified stock options until the occurrence of future disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock and such disqualified dispositions may happen in periods when our stock price substantially
increases, and because a portion of that tax benefit may be directly recorded to additional paid-in
capital, our future quarterly and annual effective tax rates will be subject to greater volatility
and, consequently, our ability to estimate reasonably our future quarterly and annual effective tax
rates is greatly diminished.
40
Results of Operations
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 compared with fiscal year ended June 30, 2007
Net Revenue.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
PC applications |
|
$ |
226,208 |
|
|
$ |
272,796 |
|
|
$ |
46,588 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
|
75.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital lifestyle product applications |
|
|
40,579 |
|
|
|
88,261 |
|
|
|
47,682 |
|
|
|
117.5 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
266,787 |
|
|
$ |
361,057 |
|
|
$ |
94,270 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue was $361.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared with $266.8 million
for the year ended June 30, 2007, an increase of $94.3 million, or 35.3%. Of our fiscal 2008 net
revenue, $272.8 million, or 75.6%, of net revenue was from the personal computing market and $88.3
million, or 24.4%, of net revenue was from the digital lifestyle products markets, including $47.7
million from mobile smartphones and feature phones, of which $30.5 million was in the fourth
quarter. The increase in net revenue for the year ended June 30, 2008 was attributable to a $46.6
million, or 20.6%, increase in PC applications net revenue and a $47.7 million, or 117.5%, increase
in digital lifestyle product applications net revenue. The increase in PC applications net revenue
was primarily attributable to notebook industry growth, continuing adoption by notebook OEMs of our
capacitive interface multimedia controls, and additional penetration in PC peripherals, partially
offset by a decline in PC applications market share. Digital lifestyle product application net
revenue growth resulted from both industry growth and higher market penetration. Based on industry
estimates, notebook market growth for 2008 is anticipated to be approximately 35%, digital music
player market growth for 2008 is anticipated to be approximately 6%, and mobile smartphone and
feature phone market growth for 2008 is anticipated to be approximately 41%. The overall increase
in net revenue was primarily attributable to a 44% increase in unit shipments, reflecting industry
growth and higher market penetration in the digital lifestyle product application markets,
partially offset by a lower-priced product mix, which included both our custom modules and OneTouch
ASIC shipments, and general competitive pricing pressure, and a decline in PC applications market
share and the combination of which resulted in an overall 6% reduction in the unit price of our
product mix when compared to the prior year.
Gross Margin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
105,874 |
|
|
$ |
147,451 |
|
|
$ |
41,577 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue was 40.8%, or $147.5 million, for the year ended
June 30, 2008 compared with 39.7%, or $105.9 million, for the year ended June 30, 2007. As each
product we sell utilizes our capacitive sensing technology in a design that is generally unique or
specific to a customers application, gross margin varies on a product-by-product basis, making our
cumulative gross margin a blend of our product specific designs and OneTouch offerings, which are
independent of the vertical markets that our products serve. The increase in gross margin as a
percentage of net revenue primarily reflected a higher margin product design mix, in addition to
lower manufacturing costs, resulting from our continuing design, process-improvement, and
cost-reduction programs, partially offset by an increase in products containing generally higher
third-party content and general competitive pricing pressure.
41
Operating Expenses.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
$ |
39,386 |
|
|
$ |
50,093 |
|
|
$ |
10,707 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
|
|
11,879 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(915 |
) |
|
|
-100.0 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
76,548 |
|
|
$ |
98,219 |
|
|
$ |
21,671 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased as a
percentage of net revenue to 13.9% from 14.8%, while the cost of research and development
activities increased $10.7 million, or 27.2%, to $50.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008
compared with $39.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2007. The increase in research and
development expenses primarily reflected a $6.3 million increase in employee compensation and
employment related costs resulting from additional staffing, increased base compensation related to
our annual performance review process, increased employee benefits costs, increased share-based
compensation costs, increased incentive compensation costs, and increased recruiting costs; a $2.0
million increase of project expenses, including materials and related costs; a $1.3 million
increase in infrastructure and support costs; and a $1.0 million increase in consulting and outside
service costs. Non-cash share-based compensation costs included in research and development
expenses were $5.1 million, or 1.9% of net revenue, and $6.3 million, or 1.8% of net revenue, for
fiscal 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses
decreased as a percentage of net revenue to 13.3% from 13.6%, while the cost of selling, general,
and administrative activities increased $11.9 million, or 32.8%, to $48.1 million for the year
ended June 30, 2008 compared with $36.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2007. The increase in
selling, general, and administrative expenses primarily reflected a $5.7 million increase in
employee compensation and employment related costs, resulting from additional staffing, increased
base compensation related to our annual performance review process, increased employee benefits
costs, increased share-based compensation costs, increased incentive compensation costs, and
increased recruiting costs; a $2.9 million increase in consulting and outside service costs; a $1.3
million increase in travel and related costs; a $937,000 increase in professional service costs;
and a $686,000 increase in infrastructure and support costs. The increase in professional service
costs includes legal fees primarily related to ongoing patent infringement litigation, which is
more fully described in Part I Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Non-cash share-based compensation
costs included in selling, general, and administrative expenses were $8.5 million, or 3.2% of net
revenue, and $10.1 million, or 2.8% of net revenue, for fiscal 2007 and 2008, respectively.
Restructuring Charge. For fiscal 2007, we incurred a restructuring charge of $915,000 in
connection with the closure of our European development center as part of our strategic efforts to
realign our development capabilities to better meet the needs of our Asia/Pacific customer base.
Included in the restructuring charge were personnel costs, consisting of severance and relocation
of $526,000; a lease reserve of $287,000, net of estimated sublease income; and a non-cash
impairment of property and equipment of $102,000. As of June 30, 2007, all costs associated with
the restructuring were settled and no additional payment obligation exists.
Operating Income.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Operating Income |
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
|
$ |
49,232 |
|
|
$ |
19,906 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
We generated operating income of $49.2 million, or 13.6% of net revenue, for the year ended
June 30, 2008 an increase of $19.9 million compared with $29.3 million, or 11.0% of net revenue,
for the year ended June 30, 2007. As discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the increase in
operating income was primarily attributable to the increase in operating leverage resulting from
the 35.3% increase in net revenue and a 110 basis point increase in our gross margin percentage,
partially offset by a $21.7 million increase in our operating expenses.
Non-Operating Income/(Loss).
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
11,055 |
|
|
$ |
9,652 |
|
|
$ |
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
-12.7 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
-6.6 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
-0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
NA |
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
NA |
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate
securities investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,963 |
) |
|
|
(6,963 |
) |
|
NA |
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
-1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-operating income/ (loss) |
|
$ |
9,105 |
|
|
$ |
(444 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,549 |
) |
|
|
-104.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
-0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income. Interest income was $9.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 compared
with $11.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2007. The $1.4 million decrease in interest income
resulted from a combination of lower average invested cash balances and lower average interest
rates. The decrease in cash balances was primarily related to $165.0 million used for the purchase
of our common stock in the open market and $7.0 million used for capital expenditures, partially
offset by $75.6 million of cash flows from operations and $25.1 million of proceeds and excess tax
benefit from stock option and employee stock purchase plan activity.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $2.0 million and $1.8 million for fiscal 2007 and
2008, respectively, and consisted primarily of interest expense and amortization of debt issuance
costs related to our convertible senior subordinated notes issued in December 2004. The annual
debt service cost on the notes is approximately $938,000, which excludes $860,000 of amortization
of debt issuance costs.
Gain on Settlement of Debt. In fiscal 1998, National Semiconductor Corporation, or National,
loaned us $1.5 million under a limited-recourse note, which we utilized to purchase 900,000 Series
A preferred shares of Foveon. In fiscal 1998, under the equity method of accounting, we recorded
our share of losses incurred by Foveon and reduced the carrying value of our equity investment to
zero. The note plus accrued interest of $1.2 million came due in August 2007, and, in accordance
with the security agreement, we surrendered the 900,000 Series A preferred shares securing the note
to National in full settlement of the principal and accrued interest. Consequently, we recognized
a non-operating gain upon settlement of debt in the amount of $2.7 million in fiscal 2008.
Impairment of Investment. In fiscal 2005, we participated in an equity financing, receiving
3.9 million Series E preferred shares of Foveon for a cash investment of $4.0 million. We are not
obligated to provide additional funding to Foveon. We accounted for our Series E preferred shares
of Foveon under the cost method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 18 and EITF Issues No. 02-14 and
No. 03-1 because the investment is not in-substance common stock.
In fiscal 2008, we determined there was an other-than-temporary impairment of the carrying
value of our investment in Foveon, due to liquidity visibility and liquidation preferences for the
most recent preferred equity round, in which we did not participate. Consequently, we recognized a
$4.0 million other-than-temporary impairment charge.
43
Impairment of auction rate securities investments. In fiscal 2008, based on our fair value
analysis of our ARS, we determined there was an other-than-temporary impairment of the carrying
value of certain of our investments in ARS, which have continued to fail to clear at auction since
August 2007. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of these ARS investments by $7.0 million
through an other-than-temporary impairment charge to income.
Provision for Income Taxes.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
38,431 |
|
|
$ |
48,788 |
|
|
$ |
10,357 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
17,688 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
% |
% of income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $17.7
million compared with $11.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2007, reflecting higher pre-tax
profits offset by an increase of valuation allowance related to impairment charges on certain
investments. The income tax provision represented estimated federal, foreign, and state taxes for
the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2008. The effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2008
was approximately 36.3% and diverged from the combined federal and state statutory rate primarily
as a result of the incremental research credits associated with stock option activity and
tax-exempt interest income, partially offset by the impact of impairment losses, foreign
withholding taxes, and the accounting for share-based compensation. The effective tax rate for the
year ended June 30, 2007 was approximately 31.0% and diverged from the combined federal and state
statutory rate primarily as a result of the incremental research credits associated with stock
option activity, tax-exempt interest income, the release of contingency reserves related to statute
expirations and amended return filings, and the extension of the federal research credit, partially
offset by the impact of accounting for share-based compensation and foreign withholding taxes.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit upon expensing nonqualified stock
options and deferred stock units issued under our share-based compensation plans. However, under
current accounting standards, we cannot recognize tax benefit concurrent with expensing incentive
stock options and employee stock purchase plan shares (qualified stock options) issued under our
share-based compensation plans. For qualified stock options that vested after our adoption of SFAS
123R, we recognize tax benefit only in the period when disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock occur, which historically has been up to several years after vesting and in a period when our
stock price substantially increases. For qualified stock options that vested prior to our adoption
of SFAS 123R, the tax benefit is recorded directly to additional paid-in capital. Tax benefit
associated with total share-based compensation was approximately $4.1 million and $6.1 million for
the year ended June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. Excluding the impact of share-based
compensation and the related tax benefit, the effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2007
and 2008 would have been 30.4% and 35.9%, respectively. Because we cannot recognize the tax
benefit for share-based compensation expense associated with qualified stock options until the
occurrence of future disqualifying dispositions of the underlying stock and such disqualified
dispositions may happen in periods when our stock price substantially increases, and because a
portion of that tax benefit may be recorded directly to additional paid-in capital, our future
quarterly and annual effective tax rates will be subject to greater volatility and, consequently,
our ability to reasonably estimate our future quarterly and annual effective tax rates is greatly
diminished.
44
Results of Operations
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 compared with fiscal year ended June 30, 2006
Net Revenue.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
PC applications |
|
$ |
157,511 |
|
|
$ |
226,208 |
|
|
$ |
68,697 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
85.3 |
% |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital lifestyle product applications |
|
|
27,046 |
|
|
|
40,579 |
|
|
|
13,533 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
184,557 |
|
|
$ |
266,787 |
|
|
$ |
82,230 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue was $266.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2007 compared with $184.6 million
for the year ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $82.2 million, or 44.6%. Of fiscal 2007 net
revenue, $226.2 million, or 84.8%, of net revenue was from the personal computing market and $40.6
million, or 15.2%, of net revenue was from the digital lifestyle products markets. The increase in
net revenue for the year ended June 30, 2007 was attributable to a $68.7 million, or 43.6%,
increase in PC applications net revenue and a $13.5 million, or 50.0%, increase in digital
lifestyle product applications net revenue. The increase in PC applications net revenue was
primarily attributable to notebook industry growth, coupled with market share gains, additional
penetration in PC peripherals, and continuing adoption by notebook OEMs of our capacitive interface
multimedia controls. Digital lifestyle product application net revenue growth resulted from both
industry growth and market share gains. The overall increase in net revenue was primarily
attributable to an 80% increase in unit shipments, reflecting the combination of industry growth
and market share gains, partially offset by a lower-priced product mix and general competitive
pricing pressure.
Gross Margin.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Gross Margin |
|
$ |
82,853 |
|
|
$ |
105,874 |
|
|
$ |
23,021 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
44.9 |
% |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin as a percentage of net revenue was 39.7%, or $105.9 million, for the year ended
June 30, 2007 compared with 44.9%, or $82.9 million, for the year ended June 30, 2006. As each
product we sell utilizes our capacitive sensing technology in a design that is generally unique or
specific to a customers application, gross margin varies on a product-by-product basis, making our
cumulative gross margin a blend of our product specific designs and independent of the vertical
markets that our products serve. The decline in gross margin as a percentage of net revenue
primarily reflected a lower margin product design mix, which included a substantial increase in
products containing generally higher third-party content and general competitive pricing pressure,
partially offset by lower manufacturing costs, resulting from our continuing design,
process-improvement, and cost-reduction programs.
45
Operating Expenses.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
$ |
35,356 |
|
|
$ |
39,386 |
|
|
$ |
4,030 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
8,228 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
NA |
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
63,375 |
|
|
$ |
76,548 |
|
|
$ |
13,173 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased as a
percentage of net revenue to 14.8% from 19.1%, while the cost of research and development
activities increased $4.0 million, or 11.4%, to $39.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2007
compared with $35.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2006. The increase in research and
development expenses primarily reflected a $2.3 million increase in employee compensation and
employment related costs resulting from additional staffing, increased base compensation related to
our annual performance review process, increased employee benefits costs, increased variable
compensation costs, and increased recruiting costs; a $948,000 increase in infrastructure and
support costs; and a $944,000 increase in consulting and outside service costs, partially offset by
a $1.0 million reduction of project materials and related costs. Non-cash share-based compensation
costs included in research and development expenses were $5.1 million, or 1.9% of net revenue, and
$4.8 million, or 2.6% of net revenue, for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses
decreased as a percentage of net revenue to 13.6% from 15.2%, while the cost of selling, general,
and administrative activities increased $8.2 million, or 29.4%, to $36.2 million for the year ended
June 30, 2007 compared with $28.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2006. The increase in
selling, general, and administrative expenses primarily reflected a $3.6 million increase in
employee compensation and employment related costs, resulting from additional staffing, increased
base compensation related to our annual performance review process, increased employee benefits
costs, increased recruiting costs, and increased variable compensation costs; a $1.8 million
increase in legal fees; and a $1.3 million increase in consulting and outside service costs. The
increase in legal fees was primarily related to ongoing patent infringement litigation, which is
more fully described in Part I Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Non-cash share-based compensation
costs included in selling, general, and administrative expenses were $8.5 million, or 3.2% of net
revenue, and $7.7 million, or 4.2% of net revenue, for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Restructuring Charge. For fiscal 2007, we incurred a restructuring charge of $915,000 in
connection with the closure of our European development center as part of our strategic efforts to
realign our development capabilities to better meet the needs of our Asia/Pacific customer base.
Included in the restructuring charge were personnel costs, consisting of severance and relocation
of $526,000; a lease reserve of $287,000, net of estimated sublease income; and a non-cash
impairment of property and equipment of $102,000. As of June 30, 2007, all costs associated with
the restructuring have been settled and no additional payment obligation exists.
Operating Income.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Operating Income |
|
$ |
19,478 |
|
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,848 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We generated operating income of $29.3 million, or 11.0% of net revenue, for the year ended
June 30, 2007, an increase of $9.8 million compared with $19.5 million, or 10.6% of net revenue,
for the year ended June 30,
46
2006. As discussed in the preceding paragraphs, the increase in
operating income was primarily attributable to the increase in operating leverage resulting from
the 44.6% increase in net revenue, partially offset by a 5.2 point decline in our gross margin
percentage and a $13.2 million increase in our operating expenses, which included a $915,000
restructuring charge associated with the closure of our European development center.
Interest Income/(Expense).
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
7,984 |
|
|
$ |
11,055 |
|
|
$ |
3,071 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
% of net revenue |
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
6,045 |
|
|
$ |
9,105 |
|
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income. Interest income was $11.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2007 compared
with $8.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2006. The $3.1 million increase in interest income
resulted from a combination of higher average interest rates and higher average invested cash
balances. The increase in cash balances was primarily related to $26.3 million of cash flows from
operations and $31.4 million of proceeds and excess tax benefit from stock option and employee
stock purchase plan activity, partially offset by $32.3 million used for the purchase of our common
stock in the open market and $5.8 million used for capital expenditures.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $1.9 million for both fiscal 2006 and 2007 and
consisted primarily of interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs related to our
convertible senior subordinated notes issued in December 2004. The annual debt service cost on the
notes is approximately $938,000, which excludes $860,000 of amortization of debt issuance costs.
Provision for Income Taxes.
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
25,523 |
|
|
$ |
38,431 |
|
|
$ |
12,908 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
% of income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
46.3 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of net revenue |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 2007 was approximately $11.9
million compared with $11.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2006, reflecting significantly
higher pre-tax profits, offset by a significantly lower effective tax. The income tax provision
represented estimated federal, foreign, and state taxes for the years ended June 30, 2006 and 2007.
The effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2007 was approximately 31.0% and diverged from
the combined federal and state statutory rate primarily as a result of the incremental research
credits associated with stock option activity, tax-exempt interest income, the release of
contingency reserves related to statute expirations and amended return filings, and the extension
of the federal research credit, partially offset by the impact of accounting for share-based
compensation and foreign withholding taxes. The effective tax rate for the year ended June 30,
2006 was approximately 46.3% and diverged from the combined federal and state statutory rate
primarily as a result of the impact of accounting for share-based compensation and foreign
withholding taxes, partially offset by the impact of the release of contingency reserves,
tax-exempt interest income, and the benefit of research and development tax credits.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit upon expensing nonqualified stock
options and deferred stock units issued under our share-based compensation plans. However, under
current accounting standards, we cannot recognize tax benefit concurrent with expensing incentive
stock options and employee stock
47
purchase plan shares (qualified stock options) issued under our
share-based compensation plans. For qualified stock options that vested after our adoption of SFAS
123R, we recognize tax benefit only in the period when disqualifying dispositions of the underlying
stock occur, which historically has been up to several years after vesting and in a period when our
stock price substantially increases. For qualified stock options that vested prior to our adoption
of SFAS 123R, the tax benefit is recorded directly to additional paid-in capital. Tax benefit
associated with total share-based compensation was approximately $2.9 million and $4.1 million for
the year ended June 30, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Excluding the impact of share-based
compensation and the related tax benefit, the effective tax rate for the year ended June 30, 2006
and 2007 would have been 38.1% and 30.4%, respectively. Because we cannot recognize the tax
benefit for share-based compensation expense associated with qualified stock options until the
occurrence of future disqualifying dispositions of the underlying stock and such disqualified
dispositions may happen in periods when our stock price substantially increases, and because a
portion of that tax benefit may be recorded directly to additional paid-in capital, our future
quarterly and annual effective tax rates will be subject to greater volatility and, consequently,
our ability to reasonably estimate our future quarterly and annual effective tax rates is greatly
diminished.
48
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the eight
quarters in the two-year period ended June 30, 2008. You should read the following table in
conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report. We
have prepared this unaudited information on the same basis as our audited financial statements.
This table includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we
consider necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for the
quarters presented. Past operating results are not necessarily indicative of future operating
performance; accordingly, you should not draw any conclusions about our future results from the
results of operations for any quarter presented.
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September |
|
|
December |
|
|
March |
|
|
June |
|
|
September |
|
|
December |
|
|
March |
|
|
June |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
54,815 |
|
|
$ |
76,087 |
|
|
$ |
64,309 |
|
|
$ |
71,576 |
|
|
$ |
86,692 |
|
|
$ |
98,650 |
|
|
$ |
78,861 |
|
|
$ |
96,854 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
32,420 |
|
|
|
45,696 |
|
|
|
39,162 |
|
|
|
43,635 |
|
|
|
51,228 |
|
|
|
57,605 |
|
|
|
46,688 |
|
|
|
58,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
22,395 |
|
|
|
30,391 |
|
|
|
25,147 |
|
|
|
27,941 |
|
|
|
35,464 |
|
|
|
41,045 |
|
|
|
32,173 |
|
|
|
38,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
9,958 |
|
|
|
9,485 |
|
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
10,402 |
|
|
|
11,693 |
|
|
|
13,560 |
|
|
|
14,438 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
7,801 |
|
|
|
8,927 |
|
|
|
9,339 |
|
|
|
10,180 |
|
|
|
10,750 |
|
|
|
11,415 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
13,780 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
16,989 |
|
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
18,824 |
|
|
|
20,935 |
|
|
|
21,152 |
|
|
|
23,108 |
|
|
|
25,741 |
|
|
|
28,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,406 |
|
|
|
10,591 |
|
|
|
6,323 |
|
|
|
7,006 |
|
|
|
14,312 |
|
|
|
17,937 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
10,551 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
2,978 |
|
|
|
2,713 |
|
|
|
2,825 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
Gain on settlement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of auction rate
securities investments(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,237 |
) |
|
|
(4,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
15,521 |
|
|
|
20,501 |
|
|
|
6,039 |
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
6,305 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
|
$ |
9,341 |
|
|
$ |
5,635 |
|
|
$ |
7,431 |
|
|
$ |
11,262 |
|
|
$ |
14,196 |
|
|
$ |
3,008 |
|
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(2) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(2) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(2) |
|
|
37,701 |
|
|
|
38,352 |
|
|
|
38,735 |
|
|
|
38,565 |
|
|
|
39,315 |
|
|
|
40,241 |
|
|
|
37,140 |
|
|
|
33,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(2) |
|
|
43,880 |
|
|
|
44,538 |
|
|
|
44,388 |
|
|
|
41,517 |
|
|
|
41,537 |
|
|
|
42,480 |
|
|
|
37,953 |
|
|
|
35,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal 2008, we determined there was an other-than-temporary impairment of the carrying value of certain of our investments in ARS, which have continued to
fail to clear at auction since August 2007. Accordingly, we reduced the carrying value of these ARS investments by $2.2 million and $4.7 million
through an other-than-temporary impairment charge to income in our quarters ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend to each stockholder of record
on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were $146.5 million as of June 30, 2008
compared with $265.0 million as of June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily related to $165.0
million used for the purchase of our common stock in the open market; $37.9 million of auction rate
securities, net of $9.5 million of impairment, reclassified to non-current; and $7.0 million used
for capital expenditures, partially offset by $76.4 million of cash flows from operations and $24.8
million of proceeds from stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan activity.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. For the year ended June 30, 2008, the net cash provided
by operating activities of $76.4 million was primarily attributable to net income of $31.1 million
plus adjustments for non-cash charges, including share-based compensation costs of $17.5 million
and impairment of investment, impairment of auction rate securities investments, depreciation,
impairment of software costs, deferred taxes, and
49
amortization of debt issuance costs aggregating
$16.4 million, a net decrease in operating assets and liabilities of $14.0 million, partially
offset by a non-cash benefit of $2.7 million on the settlement of debt. The net decrease in
operating assets and liabilities related primarily to a $17.4 million changes in income taxes,
which included the receipt of a $10.3 million refund. For the year ended June 30, 2007, the net
cash provided by operating activities of $26.3 million was primarily attributable to net income of
$26.5 million plus the tax benefit from stock options of $10.8 million and adjustments for non-cash
charges, including share-based compensation costs of $14.3 million and depreciation, impairment,
deferred taxes, and amortization of debt issuance costs totaling $3.2 million, partially
offset by a net increase in operating assets and liabilities of $18.7 million and excess tax
benefit from share-based compensation of $9.9 million. The net increase in operating assets and
liabilities related primarily to an increase in accounts receivable of $22.7 million, which was a
direct result of our significant increase in net revenue. For the year ended June 30, 2006, the net
cash provided by operating activities of $24.8 million was primarily attributable to net income of
$13.7 million, plus tax benefit from stock options of $6.2 million, and adjustments for non-cash
charges, including share-based compensation costs of $13.2 million and depreciation, deferred
taxes, and amortization of debt issuance costs totaling $4.0 million, partially offset by a net
increase in operating assets and liabilities of $7.1 million and excess tax benefit from
share-based compensation of $5.2 million. The net increase in operating assets and liabilities
related primarily to a reduction of income taxes payable of $6.8 million.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Our investing activities typically relate to purchases
of government-backed securities and investment-grade fixed income instruments and purchases of
property and equipment, Investing activities for fiscal 2008 generated net cash of $114.7 million
compared with $18.1 million and $53.2 million of net cash used in investing activities for fiscal
2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash provided by investing activities for fiscal 2008 consisted of
proceeds from sales and maturities of $294.3 million for short-term investments, partially offset
by purchases of $172.5 million for short-term investments and $7.1 million for purchases of capital
assets. Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2007 consisted of purchases of $280.9
million for short-term investments and $5.8 million for purchases of capital assets, partially
offset by proceeds from sales and maturities of $268.6 million for short-term investments. Net
cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2006 consisted of purchases of $250.9 million for
short-term investments and $3.1 million for purchases of capital assets, partially offset by
proceeds from sales and maturities of $200.8 million for short-term investments.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities for the years
ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 was $5.1 million, $1.0 million, and $140.7 million,
respectively. Our financing activities for fiscal 2008 primarily related to $165.0 million for the
purchase of our common stock in the open market, partially offset by $24.8 million of proceeds from
common stock issued under our share-based compensation plans and $289,000 of excess tax benefit
from share-based compensation, partially offset by $746,000 used for the payment of payroll taxes
for deferred stock units. Our financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2007 primarily
related to $32.3 million for the purchase of our common stock in the open market, partially offset
by $21.5 million of proceeds from common stock issued under share-based compensation plans and $9.9
million from excess tax benefit from share-based compensation. Our financing activities for the
year ended June 30, 2006 primarily related to $18.8 million for the purchase of our common stock in
the open market, partially offset by $8.5 million of proceeds from common stock issued under
share-based compensation plans and $5.2 million from excess tax benefit from share-based
compensation.
Common Stock Purchase Program. In July 2008, our board of directors authorized an additional
$80 million for our common stock purchase program. The program authorizes us to purchase our
common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending upon market
conditions and other factors. The number of shares purchased and the timing of purchases is based
on the level of our cash balances, general business and market conditions, and other factors,
including alternative investment opportunities. Common stock purchased under this program is held
as treasury stock. From April 2005 through June 30, 2008, we purchased 9,088,100 shares of our
common stock in the open market for an aggregate cost of $237.4 million or an average cost of
$26.12 per share under our authorized common stock purchase programs. As of July 2008, we had
$82.6 million remaining under our common stock purchase program, which expires in July 2010.
Bank Credit Facility. We currently maintain a $20.0 million working capital line of credit
with Wells Fargo Bank. The Wells Fargo Bank revolving line of credit, which expires on March 1,
2009, has an interest rate equal to the prime lending rate or 150 basis points above LIBOR, depending on
whether we choose a variable or fixed rate, respectively. We had not borrowed any amounts under
the line of credit as of June 30, 2008.
50
Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes. In December 2004, we issued an aggregate of $125
million of 0.75% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes maturing December 1, 2024 (the Notes) in a
private offering pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection
with issuing the Notes, we incurred debt issuance costs of $4.3 million, consisting primarily of
the initial purchasers discount and costs related to legal, accounting, and printing, which are
being amortized over five years.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 0.75% per annum payable on December 1 and June 1 of each
year. However, we will pay additional contingent interest on the Notes if the average trading
price of the Notes is at or above 120% of the principal amount of the Notes for a specified period
beginning with the six-month period commencing December 1, 2009. The amount of contingent interest
payable on the Notes with respect to a six-month period, for which contingent interest applies,
will equal 0.375% per annum of the average trading price of the Notes for a specified
five-trading-day period preceding such six-month period.
As a result of our irrevocable election in April 2007 to cash settle the principal amount of
the Notes, no shares of common stock will be issued to settle the principal amount of the Notes and
cash or common stock may be used to settle the value of the Notes in excess of $125 million. Our
election to cash settle the principal amount of the Notes upon conversion resulted in our using the
if converted method through the date of the election and the treasury stock method subsequent
to the date of the election for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share. Accordingly,
we will include on a prospective basis diluted shares underlying the Notes in our diluted net
income per share calculation only when the average closing stock price for the accounting period
exceeds the conversion price of the Notes, which is $33.69 per share.
The Notes may be converted (1) if, during any calendar quarter commencing after December 31,
2004, the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period
of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is
greater than or equal to 120% of the applicable conversion price on such last trading day; (2) on
or after January 1, 2020; (3) if we have called the Notes for redemption; or (4) during prescribed
periods, upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or fundamental changes. On or
after December 1, 2009, we may redeem for cash all or a portion of the Notes at a redemption price
of 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent
interest and additional interest, if any. Noteholders have the right to require us to repurchase
all or a portion of their Notes for cash on December 1, 2009, December 1, 2014, and December 1,
2019 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased plus accrued and
unpaid interest, including contingent interest and additional interest, if any. As of June 30,
2008, none of the conditions for conversion of the Notes had occurred.
The Notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to
all of our existing and future senior indebtedness, equal in right of payment with all of our
existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not, by their terms, either senior
or subordinated to the Notes, including trade debt and other general unsecured obligations that do
not constitute senior or subordinated indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to all of our
future indebtedness that, by its terms, is subordinated to the Notes. There are no financial
covenants in the Notes.
$100 Million Shelf Registration. We have registered an aggregate of $100 million of common
stock and preferred stock for issuance in connection with acquisitions, which shares generally will
be freely tradeable after their issuance under Rule 145 of the Securities Act unless held by an
affiliate of the acquired company, in which case such shares will be subject to the volume and
manner of sale restrictions of Rule 144.
Liquidity and Capital Resources. We believe our existing cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investment balances and anticipated cash flows from operating activities will be
sufficient to meet our working capital and other cash requirements over the course of at least the
next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of
revenue growth or decline, the timing and extent of spending to support product development
efforts, costs related to protecting our intellectual property, the expansion of sales and
marketing activities, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing
products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity, the continuing market
acceptance of our product solutions, our common stock purchase program, and the amount and timing
of our investments in, or acquisitions of, other technologies or companies. Further equity or debt
financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If sufficient funds are not
available or are not available on acceptable terms, our ability to take advantage of unexpected
business opportunities or to respond to competitive pressures could be limited or severely
constrained.
51
Our non-current investments include $47.4 million original cost basis of ARS that have failed
to settle in auctions. These failures generally resulted in the interest rates resetting from LIBOR
plus 50 basis points to LIBOR plus 150 basis points on the regularly scheduled auction dates.
These investments are not liquid and in the event we need to access these funds, we will not be
able to do so without a loss of principal, unless a future auction on these investments is
successful.
In 2008, we have reduced the carrying value of these investments by $9.5 million, of which
$7.0 million was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment with a corresponding charge to
income, and $2.5 million was accounted for as temporary impairment through other comprehensive
income or loss. Based on our ability to access our cash and other short-term investments, our
expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the lack of
liquidity on these investments will affect our ability to operate our business as usual.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table sets forth a summary of our material contractual obligations and
commercial commitments as of June 30, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
More than |
|
Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes(1)(2) |
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
Building leases |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents both principal and interest payable through the maturity date of the underlying
contractual obligation. |
|
(2) |
|
Our convertible senior subordinated notes include a provision allowing the noteholders to
require us, at the noteholders discretion, to repurchase their notes at a redemption price of
100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest (including
contingent interest and additional interest, if any) on December 1, 2009, December 1, 2014,
and December 1, 2019 and in the event of a fundamental change as described in the indenture
governing the notes. The early repayment of the notes is not reflected in the above schedule,
but if all the noteholders elected to exercise their rights to require us to repurchase their
notes on December 1, 2009, then our contractual obligations for the one-to-three year period
would be increased by $123 million and no amounts would be due in more than three years. |
As of June 30, 2008, we were unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of when cash
settlement with a taxing authority may occur in connection with our unrecognized tax benefits.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements, or other relationships with unconsolidated
entities that are reasonably likely to affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no
special purpose or limited purpose entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity, or
market or credit risk support; engage in leasing, hedging, or research and development services; or
have other relationships that expose us to liability that is not reflected in the financial
statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
applies under other accounting standards that require or permit fair value measurements.
Accordingly, SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurement. SFAS 157 is effective
beginning in our first quarter of fiscal 2009. However, the effective date of SFAS 157 as it
relates to fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not
52
remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis is expected to be deferred to our first quarter of
fiscal 2010. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),
(FSP APB 14-1).
FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash
upon conversion separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will
reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when the interest cost is recognized in
subsequent periods. The coupon rate on our convertible debt instrument is 0.75% and the comparable
yield of a nonconvertible debt instrument determined at the time we issued our notes was 8.5%.
Accordingly, we anticipate the non-cash pre-tax annual impact to our results of operations from the
adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to be approximately $8.0 million to $10.0 million. FSP APB 14-1 is
effective beginning in our first quarter of fiscal 2010 and will be applied retrospectively.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162). The new standard is intended to
improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. FAS 162
is effective 60 days following SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption
of FAS 162 on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
53
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our cash, cash
equivalents, and short-term investments. Our current investment portfolio consists primarily of
government-backed securities and investment-grade instruments and we would not expect the fair
value of our investments to be significantly affected by changes in market interest rates; however,
our interest income will fluctuate with changes in market interest rates. We do not use our
investment portfolio for trading or other speculative purposes.
The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted average interest rates by year
of maturity for our cash equivalents, investments and debt obligations as of June 30, 2008 (in
thousands, except for average interest rates):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market |
|
$ |
70,756 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,756 |
|
|
$ |
70,756 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper |
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
U.S. treasury |
|
$ |
2,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,998 |
|
|
$ |
2,997 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents |
|
$ |
93,109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
93,109 |
|
|
$ |
93,108 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments fixed rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
8,964 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,964 |
|
|
$ |
8,964 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
$ |
31,492 |
|
|
$ |
9,709 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,201 |
|
|
$ |
41,334 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
3.36 |
% |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
40,456 |
|
|
$ |
9,709 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,165 |
|
|
$ |
50,298 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Non-current investments |
|
$ |
40,412 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,412 |
|
|
$ |
37,946 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate amounts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
128,600 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes bear a fixed coupon interest rate of 0.75% and
mature in December 2024. Accordingly, we are not exposed to changes in interest rates related to
our long-term debt instruments. The notes are not listed on any securities exchange or included in
any automated quotation system. The fair value of the notes may increase or decrease for various
reasons, including fluctuations in the market price of our common stock, fluctuations in market
interest rates, and fluctuations in general economic conditions. The principal and carrying amount
of the notes at June 30, 2008 was $125 million and the fair value of the notes was approximately
$128.6 million based on trading prices.
Our notes include a provision allowing the noteholders to require us, at the noteholders
discretion, to repurchase their notes at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount of the
notes plus accrued and unpaid interest (including contingent interest and additional interest, if
any) on December 1, 2009, December 1, 2014, and December 1, 2019 and in the event of a fundamental
change as described in the indenture governing the notes. The early repayment of the notes is not
reflected in the preceding schedule, but if all the noteholders elected to exercise
54
their rights to
require us to repurchase their notes on December 1, 2009, then maturities in the 2010 column would
increase by $125 million and maturities in the thereafter column would decrease by a corresponding
amount.
Our non-current investments include $47.4 million original cost basis of ARS which have failed
to settle in auctions. These failures generally resulted in the interest rates resetting from
LIBOR plus 50 basis points to LIBOR plus 150 basis points on the regularly scheduled auction dates.
These investments are not liquid and in the event we need to access these funds, we will not be
able to do so without a loss of principal, unless a future auction on these investments is
successful.
As there are currently no active markets for our various failed ARS investments, we have
estimated the fair value of these investments as of June 30, 2008 based on a trinomial discounted
cash flow analysis. The analysis considered, among other factors, the collateral underlying the
security investments, creditworthiness of the counterparty, timing of expected future cash flows,
and the probability of a successful auction in a future period. When possible, our failed ARS
investments were compared to other observable market data or securities with similar
characteristics. In fiscal 2008, we reduced the carrying value of these investments by $9.5
million, of which $7.0 million was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment with a
corresponding charge to income and $2.5 million was accounted for as temporary impairment through
other comprehensive income or loss.
Based on our ability to access our cash and other short-term investments, our expected
operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the lack of liquidity on
these investments will affect our ability to operate our business as usual.
There have been no significant changes in the maturity dates and average interest rates for
our cash equivalents and short-term investment portfolio and debt obligations subsequent to June
30, 2008.
Foreign currency exchange risk
All of our revenue and approximately 95% of our consolidated costs are denominated in U.S.
dollars. As a result, we have relatively little exposure to foreign currency exchange risks and
foreign exchange losses have been immaterial to date. We do not currently enter into
forward-exchange contracts to hedge exposure denominated in foreign currencies or any other
derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In the future, if our
operations change and we determine that our foreign exchange exposure has increased, we may
consider entering into hedging transactions to mitigate such risk.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Reference is made to the financial statements, the reports of our independent registered
public accounting firm, and the notes thereto commencing at page F-1 of this report, which
financial statements, reports, and notes are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Conclusions Regarding Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of June 30, 2008, concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in this report
was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities
and Exchange Commission rules and forms for this report.
55
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework,
our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
June 30, 2008. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30,
2008 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
its report included herein on page F-3.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error
and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues, misstatements, errors, and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have
been or will be prevented or detected. Further, internal controls may become inadequate as a
result of changes in conditions, or through the deterioration of the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
There were no items requiring reporting on Form 8-K that were not reported on Form 8-K during
the fourth quarter of the year covered by this Form 10-K.
56
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item relating to directors of our company is incorporated
herein by reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the
Exchange Act for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The information required by this Item
relating to our executive officers is included in Item 1, Business Executive Officers.
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, and other senior accounting personnel. The Code of Ethics for the CEO and
Senior Financial Officers is located on our website at www.synaptics.com in the Investor Relations
section under Corporate Governance.
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding any
amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of ethics by posting such information on our
website, at the address and location specified above.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS |
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive
Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2008 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
57
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) |
|
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
(1) |
|
Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements on page F-1 of this report. |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation (1) |
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
(b) |
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (2) |
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (3) |
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (4) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (5) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
(b) |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2002, between the registrant and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (2) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
(c) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement (6) |
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Indenture dated December 7, 2004 by and between the registrant and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (4) |
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated December 7, 2004 by and among the registrant, Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc., and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (4) |
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
1986 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
(a) |
|
1996 Stock Option Plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
(b) |
|
Form of grant agreements for 1996 Stock Option Plan (5) |
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
2000 U.K. Approved Sub-Plan to the 1996 Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(a) |
|
Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended through January 23, 2007)
(8) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(b) |
|
Form of grant agreements for Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (9) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(c) |
|
Form of deferred stock award agreement for Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation
Plan (10) |
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
(a) |
|
Corrected Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended through
January 23, 2007) (8) |
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
(b) |
|
2001 Employee Stock Purchase Sub-Plan for U.K. Employees (5) |
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
Subordinated Secured Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated August 12, 1997 executed by the
registrant in favor of National Semiconductor Corporation (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Federico
Faggin (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Francis
F. Lee (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Russell
J. Knittel (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001 between Silicon Valley Bank and
the registrant as amended through November 30, 2004 (11) |
58
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
10.17
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into as of January 28, 2002 with the following
directors and executive officers: Federico Faggin, Francis F. Lee, Russell J. Knittel, Shawn
P. Day, David T. McKinnon, Keith B. Geeslin, and Richard L. Sanquini; as of April 23, 2002
with W. Ronald Van Dell; as of June 26, 2004 with Jeffrey D. Buchanan; as of March 28, 2006
with Thomas J. Tiernan; as of September 25, 2006; with Hing Chung (Alex) Wong; as of February
20, 2007 with Nelson C. Chan; and as of October 23, 2007 with James L. Whims. (1) |
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Severance Policy for Principal Executive Officers (12) |
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement entered into by Francis F. Lee as of April 22,
2003 (12) |
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Form of Change of Control and Severance Agreement entered into by Russell J. Knittel as of
April 22, 2003 (12) |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 2004 by and among the registrant, Bear, Stearns & Co.
Inc., and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (4) |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated March 31, 2005 by and among the registrant, Alps Electric Co.
Ltd., and Cirque Corporation (13) * |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Change of Control Severance Agreement entered into by Thomas Tiernan as of April 3, 2006 (14) |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
21
|
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29,
2001, as filed with the SEC on February 21, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 8-A as filed with the SEC on August 16,
2002. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on July 31, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on December 7, 2004. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2002, as filed with the SEC on September 12, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on April 24, 2008 |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants registration statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-56026) as filed with the SEC January 22, 2002 and declared effective
January 28, 2002. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29,
2007, as filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 28,
2002, as filed with SEC on February 6, 2003. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 24,
2006, as filed with the SEC on September 7, 2006. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on December 3, 2004. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2003, as filed with the SEC on September 12, 2003. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on April 1, 2005. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the
SEC on April 3, 2006. |
|
* |
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request that
was granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange
Act. |
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED |
|
|
|
Date August 27, 2008
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Francis F. Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Francis F. Lee |
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis F. Lee
Francis F. Lee |
|
Chief Executive Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Thomas J. Tiernan
Thomas J. Tiernan |
|
President, Chief Operating Officer, and Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Russell J. Knittel
Russell J. Knittel |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Federico Faggin
Federico Faggin |
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Jeffrey D. Buchanan
Jeffrey D. Buchanan |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Nelson C. Chan
Nelson C. Chan |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Keith B. Geeslin
Keith B. Geeslin |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Richard L. Sanquini
Richard L. Sanquini |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ W. Ronald Van Dell
W. Ronald Van Dell |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
/s/ James L. Whims
James L. Whims |
|
Director
|
|
August 27, 2008 |
60
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Synaptics Incorporated:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Synaptics Incorporated and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2007 and June 28, 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended June 28, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Synaptics Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June 30,
2007 and June 28, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended June 28, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the
provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, at the beginning of
fiscal 2008.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Synaptics Incorporateds internal control over financial reporting
as of June 28, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
report dated August 27, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
August 27, 2008
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Synaptics Incorporated:
We have audited Synaptics Incorporateds (the Company) internal control over financial
reporting as of June 28, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Synaptics Incorporateds management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Synaptics Incorporated maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of June 28, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Synaptics Incorporated and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007 and June 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended June 28, 2008, and our report dated August 27, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
August 27, 2008
F-3
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value and share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,915 |
|
|
$ |
96,218 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
219,102 |
|
|
|
50,298 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $419 and $539 at
June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
56,721 |
|
|
|
69,362 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
12,034 |
|
|
|
21,065 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,245 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
338,017 |
|
|
|
240,360 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
19,400 |
|
|
|
22,459 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
Non-current investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,946 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
13,968 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373,312 |
|
|
$ |
306,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
21,552 |
|
|
$ |
27,784 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
6,510 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
7,095 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
9,120 |
|
Note payable |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
38,096 |
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
17,075 |
|
Convertible senior subordinated notes |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock;
$0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock;
$0.001 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 42,705,939
and
42,500,535 shares issued; and 39,117,839 and 33,412,435
shares outstanding; at June 30, 2007 and 2008,
respectively(1) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
180,733 |
|
|
|
222,543 |
|
Less: 3,588,100 and 9,088,100 common treasury shares at
June 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively, at cost(2) |
|
|
(72,345 |
) |
|
|
(237,387 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(2,317 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
99,795 |
|
|
|
130,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
208,087 |
|
|
|
113,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
373,312 |
|
|
$ |
306,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend to each
stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
The stock dividend will not be paid on treasury shares; accordingly, the post-split quantity of common
treasury shares for each period presented is unchanged from the pre-split quantity. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
184,557 |
|
|
$ |
266,787 |
|
|
$ |
361,057 |
|
Cost of revenue(1) |
|
|
101,704 |
|
|
|
160,913 |
|
|
|
213,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
82,853 |
|
|
|
105,874 |
|
|
|
147,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development(1) |
|
|
35,356 |
|
|
|
39,386 |
|
|
|
50,093 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative(1) |
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
36,247 |
|
|
|
48,126 |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
63,375 |
|
|
|
76,548 |
|
|
|
98,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
19,478 |
|
|
|
29,326 |
|
|
|
49,232 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,984 |
|
|
|
11,055 |
|
|
|
9,652 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
Gain on settlement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
Impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
Impairment of auction rate securities
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
38,431 |
|
|
|
48,788 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
17,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
$ |
26,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(2) |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(2) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing net income
per share : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(2) |
|
|
37,062 |
|
|
|
38,337 |
|
|
|
37,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(2) |
|
|
43,613 |
|
|
|
43,597 |
|
|
|
39,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts include share-based compensation costs as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
Research and development |
|
$ |
4,799 |
|
|
$ |
5,091 |
|
|
$ |
6,321 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
$ |
7,719 |
|
|
$ |
8,453 |
|
|
$ |
10,080 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a
stock dividend to each stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August
29, 2008. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(in thousands, except for share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock Issued |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares(1) |
|
|
Amount(1) |
|
|
Capital(1) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
|
39,059,670 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
106,673 |
|
|
$ |
(21,180 |
) |
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
$ |
59,560 |
|
|
$ |
144,660 |
|
Components of comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,701 |
|
|
|
13,701 |
|
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from option
exercises and stock purchase plan |
|
|
1,564,017 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,819 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,819 |
) |
Adjustment for non-issuance of stock
dividend on treasury shares(2) |
|
|
(583,550 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock
compensation, net of reversals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated with stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
40,040,137 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
134,204 |
|
|
|
(39,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
73,261 |
|
|
|
167,042 |
|
Components of comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,534 |
|
|
|
26,534 |
|
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from option
exercises and stock purchase plan |
|
|
3,306,801 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,398 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,346 |
) |
Adjustment for non-issuance of stock
dividend on treasury shares(2) |
|
|
(640,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated with stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,840 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
42,705,939 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
180,733 |
|
|
|
(72,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
99,795 |
|
|
|
208,087 |
|
Components of comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock from option
exercises and stock purchase plan |
|
|
2,544,596 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
24,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,764 |
|
Payroll taxes for deferred stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,042 |
) |
Adjustment for non-issuance of stock
dividend on treasury shares(2) |
|
|
(2,750,000 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit associated with stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
42,500,535 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
222,543 |
|
|
$ |
(237,387 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,317 |
) |
|
$ |
130,895 |
|
|
$ |
113,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock
dividend to each stockholder of record on August 15, 2008 and payable on August 29, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
The stock dividend will not be paid on treasury shares; accordingly, the impact of not
issuing the stock dividend on treasury shares is reflected above as adjustment for
non-issuance of stock dividend on treasury shares. |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
$ |
26,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation costs |
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
14,294 |
|
|
|
17,503 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
Impairment of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
Tax benefit realized from stock options |
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
10,840 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
(9,878 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
597 |
|
Settlement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,689 |
) |
Impairment of investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Impairment of ARS investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,963 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(22,687 |
) |
|
|
(12,641 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(2,024 |
) |
|
|
(9,031 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
577 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
|
6,232 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(796 |
) |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(6,789 |
) |
|
|
(4,678 |
) |
|
|
17,428 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
4,037 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
24,781 |
|
|
|
26,314 |
|
|
|
76,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(250,936 |
) |
|
|
(280,894 |
) |
|
|
(172,547 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
200,838 |
|
|
|
268,569 |
|
|
|
294,264 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,072 |
) |
|
|
(5,812 |
) |
|
|
(7,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(53,170 |
) |
|
|
(18,137 |
) |
|
|
114,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(18,819 |
) |
|
|
(32,346 |
) |
|
|
(165,042 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of
options
and stock purchase plan |
|
|
8,477 |
|
|
|
21,482 |
|
|
|
24,764 |
|
Payroll taxes for deferred stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
5,223 |
|
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(5,119 |
) |
|
|
(986 |
) |
|
|
(140,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(33,508 |
) |
|
|
7,191 |
|
|
|
50,303 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
72,232 |
|
|
|
38,724 |
|
|
|
45,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
38,724 |
|
|
$ |
45,915 |
|
|
$ |
96,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
11,494 |
|
|
$ |
8,920 |
|
|
$ |
2,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
SYNAPTICS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Basis of Presentation
We are a leading worldwide developer and supplier of custom-designed user interface solutions
that enable people to interact more easily and intuitively with a wide variety of mobile computing,
communications, entertainment, and other electronic devices. We currently target the personal
computer, or PC, market and the market for digital lifestyle products, including mobile smartphones
and feature phones, portable digital music and video players, and other select electronic device
markets with our customized human interface solutions. Our original equipment manufacturer, or
OEM, customers include most of the tier one PC OEMs and many of the worlds largest OEMs for mobile
smartphones and feature phones and portable digital music players.
The consolidated financial statements include our financial statements and those of our wholly
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
upon consolidation.
Our fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the last Saturday in June. The fiscal
periods presented in this report were 52-week periods for the year ended June 24, 2006 and June 28,
2008, and a 53-week period for the year ended June 30, 2007. For ease of presentation, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been shown as ending on June 30, 2006, 2007,
and 2008.
Stock Split
On July 31, 2008, we announced a 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend. The
stock dividend will be effective for stockholders of record after the close of market on August 15,
2008 and will be payable after the close of market on August 29, 2008. All share and per-share
amounts contained herein have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, cost of revenue, inventories, product warranty,
share-based compensation costs, provision for income taxes, income taxes payable, intangible
assets, and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience, applicable laws, and
various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Cash Equivalents and Investments
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less. Short-term investments consist of marketable securities and are classified as securities
available for sale under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Such securities are reported
at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, excluded from earnings and shown separately as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders equity. A decline in the
market value of a security below cost that is deemed other-than-temporary is charged to earnings,
resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security. Interest earned on marketable
securities is included in interest income. We determine realized gains and losses on the sale of
marketable securities using the specific identification method.
F-8
The following is a summary of investments in available-for-sale securities and cash
equivalents (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Money market |
|
$ |
37,785 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,785 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
Auction rate preferred |
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
U.S. agencies |
|
|
16,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
16,976 |
|
Asset backed securities |
|
|
31,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,500 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
143,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
143,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
263,944 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
263,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
Money market |
|
$ |
70,756 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,756 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
28,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,319 |
|
U.S. agencies |
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
41,201 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,334 |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
|
40,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
37,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
183,686 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
181,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of weighted average interest rates, amortized costs, and estimated
fair values of short-term available-for-sale securities and cash equivalents by contractual
maturity (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Less than one year |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
$ |
242,846 |
|
|
$ |
242,767 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
133,565 |
|
|
$ |
133,682 |
|
Due in 1 - 2 years |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
21,098 |
|
|
|
21,038 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
9,709 |
|
|
|
9,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
263,944 |
|
|
$ |
263,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
143,274 |
|
|
$ |
143,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, we had investments in auction rate securities with a fair value of $37.9
million classified as non-current investments on our balance sheet. The interest rate on our
auction rate securities generally resets every 28 days in connection with the scheduled auction
date and the contractual maturities for our auction rate securities are generally greater than nine
years. In fiscal 2008, we reduced the carrying value of our auction rate security investments by
$9.5 million, of which $7.0 million was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment with a
corresponding charge to income and $2.5 million was accounted for as temporary impairment through
other comprehensive income or loss.
F-9
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The fair values of our cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued
liabilities approximate their carrying values because of the short-term nature of those
instruments. The fair value of short-term investments is based on current trading values and the
fair value of our auction rate securities is based on discounted cash flow model. The fair value of
our convertible senior subordinated notes is based on trading values as of the end of our fiscal
year.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
primarily of cash equivalents, investments, and trade accounts receivable. Our investment policy,
which is predicated on capital preservation and liquidity, limits investments to U.S. government
treasuries and agency issues, taxable securities, and municipal issued securities with a minimum
rating of A1 (Moodys) or P1 (Standard and Poors) or equivalent. Included within our investment
portfolio are investments in auction rate securities (ARS), which met our investment guidelines
at the time of our investment. Our ARS investments are currently not liquid as a result of
continued auction failures. If the issuers are not able to meet their payment obligations or if we
sell our ARS investments before they recover, we may lose some or all of our principal invested or
may be required to further reduce the carrying value.
We sell our products primarily to contract manufacturers that provide manufacturing services
to OEMs. We extend credit based on an evaluation of a customers financial condition, and we
generally do not require collateral. To date, credit losses have been insignificant, and we
believe that an adequate allowance for doubtful accounts has been provided. At June 30, 2007 and
2008, the following customers accounted for more than 10% of our accounts receivable balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Customer A |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Customer B |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Customer C |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Other Concentrations
Our products include certain components that are currently single sourced. We believe other
vendors would be able to provide similar components; however, the qualification of such vendors may
require start-up time. In order to mitigate any adverse impacts from a disruption of supply, we
attempt to maintain an adequate supply of critical single -sourced components.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred and title has transferred, the price is fixed or determinable, and
collectibility is reasonably assured. We accrue for estimated sales returns and other allowances,
based on historical experience, at the time we recognize revenue. We record contract revenue for
research and development as the services are provided under the terms of the contract. We
recognize non-refundable contract fees for which no further performance obligations exist and for
which there is no continuing involvement by us on the earlier of when the payments are received or
when collection is assured.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability
of customers to meet their financial obligations. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the
collectibility of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances in which
we are aware of a specific
customers potential inability to meet its financial obligation, we record a specific reserve
of the bad debt against amounts due. In addition, we make judgments and estimates on the
collectibility of accounts
F-10
receivable based on our historical bad debt experience, customers creditworthiness, current
economic trends, recent changes in customers payment trends, and deterioration in the customers
operating results or financial position. If circumstances change adversely, additional bad debt
allowances may be required. The following table presents our allowances for doubtful accounts (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Adjustments to reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market (estimated
net realizable value), and at June 30, 2007 and 2008 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
10,187 |
|
|
$ |
16,336 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
4,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,034 |
|
|
$ |
21,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodically, we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers when a customers delivery
schedule is delayed or a customers order is cancelled. In those circumstances in which our
customer has cancelled its order and we purchase inventory from our contract manufacturers, we
consider a write-down to reduce the carrying value of the inventory purchased to its net realizable
value. We charge write-downs to reduce the carrying value of obsolete, slow moving, and non-usable
inventory to net realizable value to cost of revenue.
Property and Equipment
We state property and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. We
compute depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
We apply estimated useful life of three to five years to our computer equipment and software;
estimated useful lives ranging from one to five years to our manufacturing equipment; an estimated
useful life of three to five years to our furniture and fixtures; and an estimated useful life of
35 years to our building. We amortize leasehold improvements and assets recorded under capital
leases over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the asset. For the years ended June
30, 2007 and 2008, we retired fully depreciated equipment and furniture with an original cost of
$759,000 and $84,000, respectively.
Foreign Currency Translation
The U.S. dollar is our functional and reporting currency. We remeasure our monetary assets
and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency into U.S. dollar equivalents at the rate
of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date. We measure and record non-monetary balance sheet
accounts at the historical rate in effect at the date of translation. We translate revenue and
expenses at the weighted average exchange rate in the month that the transaction occurred.
Remeasurement of monetary assets and liabilities that are not denominated in the functional
currency are included currently in operating results. Translation losses included in operating
results for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 totaled $37,000, $63,000, and $73,000,
respectively. To date, we have not undertaken hedging transactions related to foreign currency
exposure.
Goodwill
We review the carrying value of goodwill at least annually for
impairment as of the fiscal year end balance sheet date. The frequency of our
review is dictated by events or changes in circumstances indicating
F-11
that the carrying value may be impaired. Based on our latest review, we determined there was no
impairment of the carrying value of goodwill.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,
we evaluate long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets subject to
amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of assets to be held and used
by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment charge in an amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would
be separately presented in the consolidated balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell, and would no longer be depreciated. The assets and
liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the
appropriate asset and liability sections of the consolidated balance sheet.
Segment Information
We have adopted SFAS 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. We operate in one segment: the development, marketing, and sale of intuitive user
interface solutions for electronic devices and products.
Share-Based Compensation Costs
We adopted SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, on a modified prospective basis beginning with
fiscal 2006 and apply the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment
(SAB 107). We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair
value of employee share-based compensatory awards, which requires the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Historical and implied volatilities
were used in estimating the fair value of our share-based awards, while the expected life for our
options was estimated to be five years based on historical trends since our initial public
offering. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated
fair value of our share-based compensation. Further, as required under SFAS 123R, we estimate
forfeitures for share-based awards that are not expected to vest. We charge estimated fair value
less estimated forfeitures to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the
underlying awards, which is generally four years for our stock option and deferred stock unit
awards and up to two years for our employee stock purchase plan.
Product Warranties
We generally warrant our products for a period of 12 months or more from the date of sale and
estimate probable product warranty costs at the time we recognize revenue. Factors that affect our
warranty liability include historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, materials usage,
rework, and delivery costs. Warranty costs incurred have not been material in recent years.
However, we assess the adequacy of our warranty obligations periodically and adjust the accrued
warranty liability on the basis of our estimates.
Changes in our warranty liability (included in other accrued liabilities) for the years ended
June 30, 2007 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning accrued warranty |
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
Provision for product warranties |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Cost of warranty claims and settlements |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending accrued warranty |
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
Advertising Expense
We expense all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs were not material to any of
the periods presented.
Comprehensive Income
Our comprehensive income consists of net income plus the effect of unrealized gains and losses
on our investments primarily due to reductions in market value of certain of our auction rate
securities and interest rate fluctuations on our fixed interest rate investments. We recognize
remeasurement adjustments in our consolidated statement of income as the U.S. dollar is the
functional currency of our foreign entities.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. We recognize deferred tax
assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We measure deferred tax assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We recognize the effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. We establish valuation allowances when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to
the amounts expected to be realized. We consider the operating earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries to be indefinitely invested outside the United States. Accordingly, no provision has
been made for the U.S. federal, state, or foreign taxes that may result from future remittances of
undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), at the beginning of the first quarter of
fiscal 2008. FIN 48 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax
positions accounted for in accordance with FIN 48. The first step is to determine when it is
more-likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution
of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as
the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a
taxing authority. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating
the impact of uncertainties in the application of highly complex tax laws. Resolution of these
uncertainties in a manner inconsistent with our expectations could have a material impact on our
results of operations and financial condition. We believe we have adequately provided for
reasonably foreseeable outcomes in connection with the resolution of income tax uncertainties.
However, our results have in the past, and could in the future, include favorable and unfavorable
adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period a determination of such estimated tax
liability is made or resolved, upon the filing of an amended return, upon a change in facts,
circumstances, or interpretation, or upon the expiration of a statute of limitation. Accordingly,
our effective tax rate could fluctuate materially from period to period.
Research and Development
We expense costs to develop our products, which include the costs incurred to design interface
solutions for customers prior to the customers incorporating those solutions into their products,
as incurred in accordance with SFAS 2 Accounting for Research and Development Costs, which
establishes accounting and reporting standards for research and development costs.
Net Income Per Share
We present basic and diluted net income per share amounts in conformity with the SFAS 128,
Earnings Per Share, (SFAS 128) for all periods presented. In accordance with SFAS 128, basic net
income per share amounts for each period presented have been computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding.
As a result of our irrevocable election in April 2007 to cash settle the principal amount of
our convertible notes, no common stock will be issued to settle the principal and cash or common
stock may be used to settle the value in excess of the principal. Our election to cash settle the
principal of the convertible notes upon
F-13
conversion resulted in our using the if converted method through the date of the election
and the treasury stock method subsequent to the date of the election for purposes of calculating
diluted net income per share. Accordingly, diluted net income per share amounts for each period
presented have been computed (1) using the weighted average number of potentially dilutive shares
issuable in connection with our share-based compensation plans under the treasury stock method, (2)
through April 2007 using the weighted average number of shares issuable in connection with our
convertible debt under the if-converted method, and (3) from April 2007 using the weighted average
number of potentially dilutive shares issuable in connection with our convertible debt under the
treasury stock method, when dilutive.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
applies under other accounting standards that require or permit fair value measurements.
Accordingly, SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurement. SFAS 157 is effective
beginning in our first quarter of fiscal 2009. However, the effective date of SFAS 157 as it
relates to fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are not
remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis is expected to be deferred to our first quarter of
fiscal 2010. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),
(FSP APB 14-1). FSP APB 14-1 requires that issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash upon conversion separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when the interest cost is
recognized in subsequent periods. The coupon rate on our convertible debt instrument is 0.75% and
the comparable yield of a nonconvertible debt instrument determined at the time we issued our notes
was 8.5%. Accordingly, we anticipate the non-cash pre-tax annual impact to our results of
operations from the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to be approximately $8.0 million to $10.0 million.
FSP APB 14-1 will be effective beginning with the first quarter of our fiscal 2010 and will be
applied retrospectively.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162). The new standard is intended to
improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting
accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. FAS 162
is effective 60 days following SEC approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Auditing amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of
FAS 162 on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
2. Gain from Settlement of Debt and Impairment of Investment
Gain from Settlement of Debt
In fiscal 1998, we entered into agreements with National Semiconductor Corporation
(National) with respect to the formation of a development-stage company, Foveonics, Inc. (now
known as Foveon, Inc. and referred to herein as Foveon), which was formed to develop and produce
digital imaging products. We contributed technology for which we had no accounting basis for a 30%
interest in Foveon in the form of voting convertible preferred stock. Under the agreements, we had
the right to acquire additional shares of convertible preferred stock at a specified price in
exchange for a limited-recourse loan from National. National loaned us $1.5 million under a
non-recourse 6% interest bearing note, which we utilized to purchase 900,000 Series A preferred
shares of Foveon, which increased our ownership interest in Foveon to 43%.
In fiscal 1998, we recorded our share of losses incurred by Foveon under the equity accounting
method on the basis of our proportionate ownership of voting convertible preferred stock and
reduced the carrying value of our equity investment to zero as our share of losses incurred by
Foveon exceeded the carrying value of our investment. The $1.5 million note to National plus
accrued interest of $1.2 million came due in August 2007, and, in accordance with the security
agreement, we surrendered our 900,000 Series A preferred
F-14
shares securing the note to National in full settlement of the principal and accrued interest.
Consequently, we recognized a non-operating gain upon settlement of debt in the amount of $2.7
million in fiscal 2008.
Impairment of Investment
In fiscal 2005, we participated in an equity financing, receiving 3,943,217 shares of Foveon
Series E preferred stock for a cash investment of $4.0 million. Our CEO and a member of our board
of directors are directors of Foveon. The Series E preferred shares are convertible into common
shares on a one-for-one basis at any time at our option, upon a firm underwritten public offering
of Foveon common stock of not less than $20 million at a price per share of not less than three
times the original issue price, or upon the written agreement of the holders of at least 60% of the
outstanding preferred shares voting as a single class. The Series E preferred shares are also
entitled to a liquidation preference up to two times the original issue price over the earlier
non-Series E preferred shares and common shares. We are not obligated to provide additional
funding to Foveon. We accounted for our Series E preferred stock investment in Foveon under the
cost method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 18 and EITF Issues No. 02-14 and No. 03-1 because
the investment is not in-substance common stock.
In fiscal 2007, Foveon completed a Series F preferred financing receiving net proceeds of
$13.8 million. The Series F preferred shareholders are entitled to a liquidation preference over
the earlier non-Series F preferred shares and common shares.
In fiscal 2008, we determined there was an other-than-temporary impairment of the carrying
value of our investment in Foveon, due to liquidity visibility and liquidation preferences for the
most recent preferred equity round. Assuming book value equals fair value of certain of Foveons
assets such as cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and no value for other tangible and
intangible assets, a hypothetical liquidation of Foveon at September 30, 2007 would benefit only
Series F preferred shareholders. Consequently, we recognized a $4.0 million other-than-temporary
impairment charge.
3. Net Income Per Share
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income |
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
$ |
26,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs on
convertible notes, net of tax |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income |
|
$ |
14,765 |
|
|
$ |
27,412 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, basic |
|
|
37,062 |
|
|
|
38,337 |
|
|
|
37,667 |
|
Effect of dilutive share-based awards |
|
|
2,840 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
Effect of convertible notes |
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares, diluted |
|
|
43,613 |
|
|
|
43,597 |
|
|
|
39,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share does not include the effect of the following share-based awards
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Share-based awards |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
F-15
These share-based awards were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share
because the proceeds received, if any, from such share-based awards combined with the average
unamortized compensation costs adjusted for the hypothetical tax benefit or deficiency creditable
or chargeable, respectively, to additional paid-in capital, were greater than the average market
price of our common stock, and therefore, their effect would have been antidilutive.
Our basic net income per share amounts for each period presented have been computed using the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Our diluted net income per share
amounts for each period presented include the weighted average effect of potentially dilutive
shares. For our stock options, deferred stock units, and our convertible notes subsequent to April
2007, we use the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect. Under the treasury
stock method, shares associated with our convertible notes will be included in the calculation of
diluted net income per share only if the weighted average price of our common stock exceeds $33.69.
We used the if converted method to determine the dilutive effect of our convertible notes prior
to April 2007 when we made an irrevocable election to cash settle the principal upon conversion.
Under the if converted method 3.7 million and 3.1 million diluted shares were included in the
calculation of diluted net income per share in fiscal 2006 and 2007, respectively.
4. Auction Rate Securities
Our non-current investments include $47.4 million original cost basis of auction rate
securities, or ARS, that have failed to settle in auctions. These failures generally resulted in
the interest rates resetting from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 50 basis points to
LIBOR plus 150 basis points on the regularly scheduled auction dates. These investments are not
liquid and in the event we need to access these funds, we will not be able to do so without a loss
of principal, unless a future auction on these investments is successful.
As there are currently no active markets for our various failed ARS investments, we have
estimated the fair value of these investments as of June 30, 2008 based on a trinomial discounted
cash flow analysis. The analysis considered, among other factors, the collateral underlying the
security investments, creditworthiness of the counterparty, timing of expected future cash flows,
and the probability of a successful auction in a future period. When possible, our failed ARS
investments were compared to other observable market data or securities with similar
characteristics. In fiscal 2008, we have reduced the carrying value of these investments by $9.5
million, of which $7.0 million was accounted for as other-than-temporary impairment with a
corresponding charge to income and $2.5 million was accounted for as temporary impairment through
other comprehensive income or loss.
As of June 30, 2008, none of our ARS investments were in default and all of our ARS
investments continue to pay interest. The following table sets forth the various types of failed
ARS investments we hold, including the original cost basis, type of impairment, the new cost basis,
the fair value (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
Other-than- |
|
|
New |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
temporary |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Temporary |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Basis |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Value |
|
Student loans |
|
$ |
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
$ |
$706 |
|
|
$ |
12,294 |
|
Closed end muni and
corporate funds |
|
|
13,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,875 |
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
12,642 |
|
Credit linked notes |
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
4,726 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
Contingent capital
notes |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
2,763 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
Muni |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ARS |
|
$ |
47,375 |
|
|
$ |
6,963 |
|
|
$ |
40,412 |
|
|
$ |
2,466 |
|
|
$ |
37,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the present time, the primary issue affecting all of our ARS investments is that of
liquidity. We have accounted for all of our ARS investments as non-current as we are not able to
reasonably determine when the ARS markets will recover or be
restructured. Based on our ability to access our cash and other short-term investments, our expected operating cash flows, and our other
sources of cash, we believe we have the ability
F-16
to hold these investments until the value recovers
or the investments mature. We will continue to monitor our ARS investments in light of the current
debt market environment and evaluate our accounting for these investments quarterly.
5. Property and Equipment
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008, property and equipment consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
35 years |
|
|
10,306 |
|
|
|
10,821 |
|
Equipment and tooling |
|
1 year to 5 years |
|
|
9,567 |
|
|
|
13,314 |
|
Furniture |
|
3 years to 5 years |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
Capitalized software |
|
3 years to 5 years |
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
6,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,746 |
|
|
|
34,552 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,346 |
) |
|
|
(12,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,400 |
|
|
$ |
22,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Other Assets
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008, other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Non-current deferred tax |
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
Investment in Foveon, Inc |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current prepaid tax |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, net |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
Deposits and other long-term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,968 |
|
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Leases and Other Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We lease our Shanghai, Beijing, and Korea facilities under operating leases that expire in
fiscal 2009, and our Hong Kong and Taiwan facilities under operating leases that expire in fiscal
2010. Total rent expense, recognized on a straight-line basis, was approximately $786,000, $1.0
million, and $1.0 million for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
The aggregate future minimum rental commitments as of June 30, 2008 for noncancelable
operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Lease |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Payments |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
1,088 |
|
2010 |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum operating lease payments |
|
$ |
1,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
Contingencies
We may receive notices from third parties that claim our products infringe their rights. From
time to time, we receive notice from third parties alleging infringement of their intellectual
property rights. We cannot be certain that our technologies and products do not and will not
infringe issued patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. Any infringement claims,
with or without merit, could result in significant litigation costs and diversion of management and
financial resources, including the payment of damages, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Indemnifications
In connection with certain third-party agreements we have executed in the past, we are
obligated to indemnify the third party in connection with any technology infringement by us. We
have also entered into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors. Maximum
potential future payments cannot be estimated because these agreements do not have a maximum stated
liability. However, historical costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been
significant. We have not recorded any liability in our consolidated financial statements for such
indemnification obligations.
Line of Credit
We currently maintain a $20 million working capital line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank. The
Wells Fargo Bank revolving line of credit, which expires on March 1, 2009, has an interest rate
equal to the prime lending rate or 150 basis points above LIBOR, depending on whether we choose a
variable or fixed rate, respectively. We had not borrowed any amounts under the line of credit as
of June 30, 2008.
Legal Proceedings
In March 2006, Elantech Devices Corporation, or Elantech, filed a Complaint for Patent
Infringement against us claiming that we infringed one of its patents and seeking damages,
attorneys fees, and a permanent injunction against us infringing or inducing others to infringe
the patent. In April 2006, we filed our Answer to the Complaint and Counterclaims against Elantech,
claiming that Elantech has infringed and induced infringement of four of our patents and seeking
damages, attorneys fees, and a permanent injunction against infringing or inducing others to
infringe.
Elantech responded to our counterclaim denying liability and counterclaimed seeking an
injunction and damages for alleged violations of California law. We subsequently filed a motion to
dismiss the Elantech counterclaims that was granted in July 2006 with leave to amend the
counterclaims after the adjudication of the patent infringement claims.
The Elantech patent relates to recognizing and providing an indication of the presence of
multiple fingers on a touchpad. We have previously developed additional ways to detect multiple
fingers and have our own related patents. The Elantech infringement claims involve two versions of
our software code (Type 1 Code and Type 2 Code) in certain products in which multiple finger
detection is enabled.
In October 2007, the Court heard oral arguments on our motion for summary judgment of
noninfringement of the Elantech patent and Elantechs cross-motion for summary judgment of
infringement. The Court granted our motion for partial summary judgment of noninfringement as to
products containing Type 1 Code and denied our motion for partial summary judgment of
noninfringement as to products containing Type 2 Code. In addition, the Court denied Elantechs
motion for summary judgment that our Type 1 and Type 2 Codes infringe Elantechs intellectual
property. The Court indicated, however, that it would grant summary judgment of infringement for
products implementing the Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting functionality.
In November 2007, Elantech moved for partial summary judgment that products implementing the
Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting functionality infringe the Elantech patent. In December
2007, Elantech moved for entry of a preliminary injunction against us importing, using, selling, or
offering to sell certain products implementing the Type 2 Code with enabled finger counting
functionality.
F-18
In December 2007, we filed a Complaint for Patent Infringement against Elantech claiming that
Elantech infringed one of our patents relating to detecting the presence of multiple fingers on a
touchpad and seeking damages, attorneys fees, and an injunction. In January 2008, we moved for
entry of summary judgment for infringement of the four Synaptics patents.
In March 2008, the Court, based on its infringement ruling, filed an order preliminarily
enjoining us from making, using, selling, or importing into or offering to sell within the United
States touchpad products containing our Type 2 firmware code with enabled multiple finger counting
functionality. We do not believe any aspect of the Courts decision will have a material effect on
our business. We are not shipping any products that utilize the contested code. As a result, the
preliminary injunction will have no impact on us, our business, or our customers. Although the
contested code is no longer used in our products, we do not believe the contested code infringes
the Elantech patent and we have appealed the Courts infringement ruling.
In April 2008, the Court granted our motion for partial summary judgment holding that use of
the corner tap, scrolling, edge motion, and drag features of Elantechs touchpad products infringe
four of our patents.
We intend to vigorously defend our patents and pursue our counterclaims. We have not recorded
any liability associated with Elantechs claims pursuant to SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, and have expensed as incurred all legal fees associated with the legal proceedings.
8. Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes
In December 2004, we issued an aggregate of $125 million of 0.75% Convertible Senior
Subordinated Notes maturing December 1, 2024 (the Notes) in a private offering pursuant to Rule
144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with issuing the Notes, we
incurred debt issuance costs of $4.3 million, consisting primarily of the initial purchasers
discount and costs related to legal, accounting, and printing, which are being amortized over five years. We expect to use the net proceeds for working
capital and general corporate purposes and potentially for future acquisitions.
The Notes bear interest at a rate of 0.75% per annum payable on December 1 and June 1 of each
year. However, we will pay additional contingent interest on the Notes if the average trading
price of the Notes is at or above 120% of the principal amount of the Notes for a specified period
beginning with the six-month period commencing December 1, 2009. The amount of contingent interest
payable on the Notes with respect to a six-month period, for which contingent interest applies,
will equal 0.375% per annum of the average trading price of the Notes for a specified five
trading-day period preceding such six-month period.
As a result of our irrevocable election in April 2007 to cash settle the principal amount of
the Notes, no shares of common stock will be issued to settle the principal amount of the Notes and
cash or common stock may be used to settle the value of the Notes in excess of $125 million, if
any. Our election to cash settle the principal amount of the Notes upon conversion resulted in our
using the if converted method through the date of the election and the treasury stock method
subsequent to the date of the election for purposes of calculating diluted net income per share.
Accordingly, we will include on a prospective basis diluted shares underlying the Notes in our
diluted net income per share calculation only when the average closing stock price for the
accounting period exceeds the conversion price of the Notes, which is $33.69 per share.
The Notes may be converted (1) if, during any calendar quarter commencing after December 31,
2004, the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period
of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is
greater than or equal to 120% of the applicable conversion price on such last trading day, (2) on
or after January 1, 2020, (3) if we have called the Notes for redemption, or (4) during prescribed
periods, upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or fundamental changes. On or
after December 1, 2009, we may redeem for cash all or a portion of the Notes at a redemption price
of 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent
interest and additional interest, if any. Noteholders have the right to require us to repurchase
all or a portion of their Notes for cash on December 1, 2009, December 1, 2014, and December 1,
2019 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be purchased plus accrued and
unpaid interest, including contingent interest and additional interest, if any. As of June 30,
2008, none of the conditions for conversion of the Notes had occurred.
F-19
The Notes are unsecured senior subordinated obligations and rank junior in right of payment to
all of our existing and future senior indebtedness, equal in right of payment with all of our
existing and future indebtedness or other obligations that are not, by their terms, either senior
or subordinated to the Notes, including trade debt and other general unsecured obligations that do
not constitute senior or subordinated indebtedness, and senior in right of payment to all of our
future indebtedness that, by its terms, is subordinated to the Notes. There are no financial
covenants in the Notes.
Interest expense includes the amortization of debt issuance costs. We recorded $1.8 million
interest expense on the Notes, which included $860,000 of amortization of debt issuance costs,
during each of the twelve-month periods ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008. At June 30, 2008, the
fair value of the notes was approximately $128.6 million based on trading values.
9. Stockholders Equity
We have a Stockholders Rights Plan that may have the effect of deterring, delaying, or
preventing a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
In general, stock purchase rights issued under the plan become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or when a tender offer or exchange offer for 15% or more
of our common stock is announced or commenced. After any such event, our other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the then-current market price. The rights
will cause substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not
approved by our board of directors. The rights should not interfere with any merger or other
business combination approved by our board of directors. The rights expire in August 2012.
Preferred Stock
We are authorized, subject to limitations imposed by Delaware law, to issue up to a total of
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder approval. Our board
of directors has the power to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in
each series and to fix the rights, preferences, and privileges of the shares of each wholly
unissued series and any of its qualifications, limitations, or restrictions. Our board of
directors can also increase or decrease the number of shares of a series, but not below the number
of shares of that series then outstanding, without any further vote or action by the stockholders.
Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with voting or conversion
rights that could harm the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock. The
issuance of preferred stock, while providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions
and other corporate purposes, could, among other things, have the effect of delaying, deferring, or
preventing a change in control of our company and might harm the market price of our common stock
and the voting power and other rights of the holders of common stock. As of June 30, 2008, there
were no shares of preferred stock outstanding and we have no current plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock.
Deferred Stock Compensation
Prior to our adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal 2006, we recorded and amortized deferred stock
compensation. Upon our adoption of SFAS 123R, we ceased amortizing deferred stock compensation,
reversed the remaining unamortized deferred stock compensation balance of $303,000 to additional
paid-in capital, and now expense the grant date fair value of share-based awards.
Shares Reserved for Future Issuance
As of June 30, 2008, we had reserved shares of common stock for future issuance as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding |
|
|
6,148,275 |
|
Deferred stock units outstanding |
|
|
573,447 |
|
Awards available for grant under all share-based award plans |
|
|
5,747,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserved for future issuance |
|
|
12,469,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
Through November 30, 2009, upon the occurrence of a fundamental change as defined in the
indenture governing the Notes, we could potentially be obligated to issue up to 11.876 shares per
$1,000 of principal amount of Notes, for a total of 1,484,381 shares of common stock, which are not
reflected in the above table.
Treasury Stock
In July 2008, our board of directors authorized an additional $80 million for our common stock
purchase program. The program authorizes us to purchase our common stock in the open market or in
privately negotiated transactions depending upon market conditions and other factors. The number
of shares purchased and the timing of purchases is based on the level of our cash balances, general
business and market conditions, and other factors, including alternative investment opportunities.
Common stock purchased under this program is held as treasury stock. From April 2005 through June
30, 2008, we purchased 9,088,100 shares of our common stock in the open market for an aggregate
cost of $237.4 million or an average cost of $26.12 per share.
10. Share-Based Compensation
The purpose of our various share-based compensation plans is to attract, motivate, retain, and
reward high-quality employees, directors, and consultants by enabling such persons to acquire or
increase their proprietary interest in our common stock in order to strengthen the mutuality of
interests between such persons and our stockholders and to provide such persons with annual and
long-term performance incentives to focus their best efforts in the creation of stockholder value.
Consequently, we determine share-based compensatory awards issued subsequent to the initial award
to our employees and consultants primarily on individual performance. Our share-based compensation
plans with outstanding awards consist of our 1996 Stock Option Plan, our 2000 Nonstatutory Stock
Option Plan, our 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan, and our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Share-based compensation awards available for grant or issuance for each plan as of the
beginning of the fiscal year, including changes in the balance of awards available for grant for
the year ended June 30, 2008, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
Employee |
|
|
Under All |
|
Nonstatutory |
|
Incentive |
|
Stock |
|
|
Share-Based |
|
Stock Option |
|
Compensation |
|
Purchase |
|
|
Award Plans |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
|
Plan |
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
4,994,943 |
|
|
|
56,376 |
|
|
|
4,263,165 |
|
|
|
675,402 |
|
Additional shares authorized |
|
|
2,705,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,315,096 |
|
|
|
390,773 |
|
Stock options granted |
|
|
(2,000,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred stock units granted |
|
|
(368,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(368,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases under employee
stock purchase plan |
|
|
(58,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,392 |
) |
Forfeited and expired |
|
|
475,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan shares expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
5,747,848 |
|
|
|
56,376 |
|
|
|
4,683,689 |
|
|
|
1,007,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our 1996 Stock Option Plan (1996 Plan) expired in December 2006. Accordingly, no new grants
can be issued under the 1996 Plan. Option awards that are currently outstanding under the 1996
Plan will remain outstanding until exercised, forfeited, or cancelled under the terms of the option
grant agreements.
F-21
Share-based compensation and the related tax benefit recognized in our consolidated statement
of income for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
4,799 |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
6,321 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
7,719 |
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
|
|
10,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,200 |
|
|
$ |
14,294 |
|
|
$ |
17,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
$ |
2,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,140 |
|
|
$ |
6,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of
certain employee share-based compensatory awards, which requires the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Historical and implied volatilities
were used in estimating the fair value of our share-based awards, while the expected life of our
options was estimated to be five years based on historical trends since our initial public
offering. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated
fair value of our share-based awards. Further, as required under SFAS 123R, we estimate
forfeitures for share-based awards that are not expected to vest. We charge the estimated fair
value less estimated forfeitures to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of
the underlying awards, which is generally four years for our stock option and deferred stock unit
awards and up to two years for our employee stock purchase plan. The Black-Scholes option pricing
model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options having no vesting
restrictions and being fully transferable. As our stock option and employee stock purchase plan
awards have characteristics that differ significantly from traded options and, as changes in the
subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, our estimate of fair value may
not accurately represent the value assigned by a third party in an arms-length transaction. While
our estimate of fair value and the associated charge to earnings materially affects our results of
operations, it has no impact on our cash position.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit upon expensing certain share-based
awards associated with our share-based compensation plans, including nonqualified stock options and
deferred stock unit awards, but under current accounting standards we cannot recognize tax benefit concurrent with
the recognition of share-based compensation expenses associated with incentive stock options and
employee stock purchase plan shares (qualified stock options). For qualified stock options that
vested after our adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognize tax benefit only in the period when
disqualifying dispositions of the underlying stock occur, which historically has been up to several
years after vesting and in a period when our stock price substantially increases. For qualified
stock options that vested prior to our adoption of SFAS 123R, the tax benefit is recorded directly
to additional paid-in capital. In fiscal 2008, we realized tax benefit from non-qualified stock
option exercises and disqualifying dispositions of qualified stock options totaling $5.8 million,
of which $1.6 million of the tax benefit was recognized as a reduction of the provision for income
taxes, $3.9 million reduced deferred tax assets established after our adoption of SFAS 123R, and
the remaining $289,000 of tax benefit was recorded directly to additional paid-in capital.
We determine excess tax benefit using the long-haul method in which we compare the actual tax
benefit associated with the tax deduction from share-based award activity to the hypothetical tax
benefit on the grant date fair values of the corresponding share-based awards. Actual tax benefit
related to the tax deduction for share-based awards exceeded the hypothetical tax benefit on the
grant date fair values of the corresponding share-based awards resulting in excess tax benefit of
$289,000 in fiscal 2008.
Historically, we have issued new shares in connection with our share-based compensation plans;
however, 9,088,100 treasury shares are also available for issuance as of the end of fiscal 2008.
Any incremental shares purchased under our common stock purchase program would be available for
issuance.
Stock Options
Our share-based compensation plans with outstanding stock option awards include our 1996 Stock
Option Plan, our 2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, and our 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (the
Plans). Under the Plans, we may grant employees, consultants, and directors incentive stock
options or
F-22
nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of our common stock at not less than 100%
or 85% of the fair market value, respectively, on the date of grant.
Options issued under the Plans generally vest 25% at the end of 12 months from the vesting
commencement date and approximately 2% each month thereafter until fully vested at the end of 48
months from the vesting commencement date. Options not exercised ten years after the date of grant
are cancelled.
The following table summarizes stock option activity and weighted average exercise prices for
stock options granted, exercised, forfeited, and expired for fiscal 2008 and the balance of
outstanding and exercisable stock options as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Option |
|
Average |
|
|
Awards |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Price |
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
6,960,172 |
|
|
$ |
12.79 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,000,870 |
|
|
|
24.64 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(2,402,344 |
) |
|
|
9.80 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(403,092 |
) |
|
|
17.18 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(7,331 |
) |
|
|
14.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
6,148,275 |
|
|
|
17.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
2,624,761 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, the number of stock options outstanding and exercisable by range of
exercise prices, the weighted average exercise prices, and the intrinsic value and for options
outstanding the weighted average remaining contractual life were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Range of |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Value |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
$ |
0.67 - $6.64 |
|
|
|
702,917 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
702,901 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
14,807 |
|
$ |
7.27 - $13.55 |
|
|
|
635,814 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
11.86 |
|
|
|
8,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
538,167 |
|
|
|
11.64 |
|
|
|
7,501 |
|
$ |
14.02 - $14.33 |
|
|
|
883,818 |
|
|
|
7.55 |
|
|
|
14.18 |
|
|
|
10,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
413,166 |
|
|
|
14.21 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
$ |
14.59 - $15.55 |
|
|
|
818,854 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
15.23 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
158,230 |
|
|
|
14.94 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
$ |
16.62 - $19.63 |
|
|
|
671,869 |
|
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
|
|
|
4,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
256,045 |
|
|
|
18.74 |
|
|
|
1,751 |
|
$ |
19.91 - $20.47 |
|
|
|
813,374 |
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
20.26 |
|
|
|
4,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
543,533 |
|
|
|
20.26 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
$ |
21.92 - $26.17 |
|
|
|
860,718 |
|
|
|
9.71 |
|
|
|
23.62 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26.47 - $27.79 |
|
|
|
596,284 |
|
|
|
9.13 |
|
|
|
26.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,719 |
|
|
|
26.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39.51 |
|
|
|
164,627 |
|
|
|
9.36 |
|
|
|
39.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,148,275 |
|
|
|
7.69 |
|
|
|
17.52 |
|
|
$ |
52,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,624,761 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
$ |
33,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price of our common stock on June 27,
2008 of $25.58 and excludes the impact of options that were not in-the-money.
At June 30, 2008, we estimate fully vested options and options expected to vest to be 5.6
million with an aggregate intrinsic value of $50.0 million having a weighted average exercise price
of $17.07 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of seven and a half years.
F-23
The following table summarizes cash received and the aggregate intrinsic value for stock
options exercised for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Cash received |
|
$ |
6,832 |
|
|
$ |
18,511 |
|
|
$ |
23,550 |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value |
|
$ |
17,707 |
|
|
$ |
40,214 |
|
|
$ |
49,272 |
|
The fair value of each award granted from our Plans for the year ended June 30, 2008 was
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming no expected
dividends and the following range of assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
49.5% - 60.4 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
4.4 - 5.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.8% - 4.6 |
% |
Fair value per award |
|
$ |
8.04 - $19.28 |
|
The expected volatility is based on historical and implied volatilities; the expected life is
based on historical option exercise trends; and the risk free interest rate is based on U. S.
Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant for the expected life of the option.
Unrecognized share-based compensation costs for stock options granted under the Plans were
approximately $32.0 million as of June 30, 2008, to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately three years.
Deferred Stock Units
Our 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (2001 Plan) provides for the grant of deferred stock
unit awards (DSUs) to our employees, consultants, and directors. A DSU is a promise to deliver
shares of our common stock at a future date in accordance with the terms of the DSU grant
agreement. We began granting DSUs in January 2006.
DSUs granted under the 2001 Plan generally vest 25% at the end of one year from the vesting
commencement date and at a rate of approximately 6% each quarter thereafter until fully vested at
the end of four years from the vesting commencement date. Delivery of shares under the plan takes
place on the quarterly vesting dates. At the delivery date, we withhold shares to cover statutory
minimum tax withholding by delivering a net number of shares. Until delivery of shares, the
grantee has no rights as a stockholder.
An election to defer delivery of the underlying shares for unvested DSUs can be made by the
grantee provided the deferral election is made at least one year before vesting and the deferral
period is at least five years from the scheduled delivery date.
The following table summarizes DSU activity, including DSUs granted, delivered, and forfeited
in fiscal 2008 and the balance and aggregate intrinsic value of DSUs as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
Aggregate |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Stock Unit |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Average |
|
|
Awards |
|
Value |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
385,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.87 |
|
Granted |
|
|
368,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25.38 |
|
Delivered |
|
|
(116,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17.45 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(64,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
573,447 |
|
|
$ |
14,662 |
|
|
$ |
22.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
Of the shares delivered, 32,655 shares valued at $746,000 were withheld to meet statutory
minimum tax withholding requirements. The aggregate intrinsic value is based on the closing price
of our common stock on June 27, 2008 of $25.58.
Unrecognized share-based compensation costs for DSUs granted under the 2001 Plan were
approximately $9.7 million as of June 30, 2008, which will be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately three years. The aggregate intrinsic value of DSUs delivered in fiscal
2008 was $2.7 million.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Our 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) became effective on January 29, 2002, the
effective date of the registration statement for our initial public offering. The ESPP allows
employees to designate up to 15% of their base compensation, subject to legal restrictions and
limitations, to purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value
(FMV) at the beginning of the offering period or the exercise date. The offering period extends
for up to two years and includes four exercise dates occurring at six month intervals. Under the
terms of the ESPP, if the FMV at an exercise date is less than the FMV at the beginning of the
offering period, the current offering period will terminate and a new two-year offering period will
commence.
The following table summarizes shares purchased, weighted average purchase price, cash
received, and the aggregate intrinsic value for ESPP purchases for the years ended June 30, 2006,
2007, and 2008 (in thousands, except for shares purchased and weighted average purchase price):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Shares purchased |
|
|
139,609 |
|
|
|
244,792 |
|
|
|
58,392 |
|
Weighted average purchase price |
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
$ |
12.15 |
|
|
$ |
20.81 |
|
Cash received |
|
$ |
1,645 |
|
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value |
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
In accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 97-1, Accounting under Statement 123 for
Certain Employee Stock Purchase Plans with a Look-Back Option, the early termination of an
offering period followed by the commencement of a new offering period represents a modification to
the terms of the related awards. Under the terms of our ESPP, the offering periods that commenced
on January 1, 2005 and 2006 were terminated on June 30, 2005 and 2006 and new offering periods
commenced on July 1, 2005 and 2006, respectively. The June 30, 2005 modification affected 169
employees, and the June 30, 2006 modification affected 13 employees. Both modifications resulted
in incremental compensation costs that were recognized on a straight-line basis over the period
from the modification date through June 30, 2007.
The fair value of each award granted under our ESPP for the year ended June 30, 2008 was
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, assuming no expected dividends and the
following range of assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
37.1% - 58.7 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
0.5 - 2.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.0% - 5.0 |
% |
Fair value per award |
|
$ |
6.51 - $9.97 |
|
The expected volatility is based on either implied volatility or a weighting of implied and
historical volatility; the expected life is based on each period that begins with the enrollment
date until each purchase date remaining in the offering period at the date of enrollment in the
plan; and the risk free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields or yield curve in effect for
each expected life.
Unrecognized share-based compensation costs for awards granted under our ESPP as of June 30,
2008 were approximately $1.3 million to be amortized over the next fiscal year.
F-25
11. Employee Benefit Plans
401(k) Plan
We have a 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan for full-time employees. Under the plan, eligible
employees may contribute a maximum of 25% of their net compensation or the annual limit of $15,500.
The annual limit for employees who are 50 years or older is $20,500. In fiscal 2008, we provided
matching funds of 25% of the employees contribution up to a maximum of $3,875 per employee. We
made matching contributions of $305,000, $383,000 and $603,000 in fiscal 2006, 2007, and 2008,
respectively.
12. Income Taxes
Income before provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
U.S |
|
$ |
18,949 |
|
|
$ |
21,863 |
|
|
$ |
15,636 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
16,568 |
|
|
|
33,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
25,523 |
|
|
$ |
38,431 |
|
|
$ |
48,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
5,192 |
|
|
$ |
7,028 |
|
|
$ |
11,094 |
|
State |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,318 |
|
|
|
12,012 |
|
|
|
17,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
State |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
11,822 |
|
|
$ |
11,897 |
|
|
$ |
17,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the federal statutory rate as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Provision at U.S. federal statutory rate |
|
$ |
8,933 |
|
|
$ |
13,451 |
|
|
$ |
17,076 |
|
State income taxes |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
1,574 |
|
Foreign withholding taxes |
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
4,842 |
|
Qualified stock options |
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
Business credits |
|
|
(2,129 |
) |
|
|
(3,915 |
) |
|
|
(1,935 |
) |
Foreign tax rate differential |
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
(3,482 |
) |
|
|
(6,749 |
) |
Tax exempt interest |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
(1,526 |
) |
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4,362 |
|
Other differences |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
(1,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
11,822 |
|
|
$ |
11,897 |
|
|
$ |
17,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008, significant components of our deferred tax assets (liabilities)
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment writedowns |
|
$ |
1,097 |
|
|
$ |
6,135 |
|
Inventory writedowns |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
4,521 |
|
Business credit carryforward |
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
Other accruals |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,612 |
|
|
|
18,357 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
(6,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,515 |
|
|
|
12,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest deduction |
|
|
(9,348 |
) |
|
|
(13,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,348 |
) |
|
|
(13,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realization of deferred tax assets depends on our generating sufficient U.S. and certain
foreign taxable income in future years to obtain benefit from the reversal of deferred tax assets.
Accordingly, the amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable may increase or decrease when
we reevaluate the underlying basis for our estimates of future U.S. and foreign taxable income. As
of June 30, 2008, a valuation allowance of $6.1 million had been established to reduce deferred tax
assets to levels that we believe are more than likely than not to be realized through future
taxable income. The valuation allowance increased by $5.0 million in fiscal 2008, primarily due to
investment writedowns.
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008, net deferred tax assets (liabilities) consisted of the following
balances (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,059 |
) |
|
|
(3,152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets liabilities |
|
$ |
(833 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets, non-current deferred tax assets, and non-current deferred tax
liabilities are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, other assets, and other
liabilities, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
As of June 30, 2008, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $33 million and $51 million, respectively. The federal and state net operating loss
carryforwards were attributable to share-based award deductions. The benefit of these net operating
losses will be recorded directly to additional-paid-in capital when realized. In addition, we had
$2.4 million and $2.0 million of federal and state tax credit carryforwards, respectively. The
federal tax credit carryforward begins to expire in 2027 and the state tax credit can be carried
forward indefinitely.
Under the current tax law, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards available to offset
future income or income taxes may be limited by statute or upon the occurrence of certain events,
including significant changes in ownership interests.
F-27
The total liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits included in our consolidated balance
sheet as of July 1, 2007 was $8.4 million. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits
increased approximately $5.1 million to $13.5 million. Of this amount, $13.2 million would affect
the effective tax rate on income from continuing operations if recognized. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
Increase in unrecognized tax benefit related to prior year tax positions |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits as of July 1,
2007 was $492,000. The liability for gross interest expense and penalties increased by $246,000 to
$738,000. Under FIN 48 our policy to classify interest and penalties, if any, as components of
income tax expense did not change.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits may
change within the next twelve months and an estimate of the range of possible changes cannot be
made at this time due to the high uncertainty of the resolution of our tax positions with the
various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Accordingly, the unrecognized tax benefits from
prior year tax positions that may be necessary to accrue for or release in fiscal 2009 can not be
reasonably estimated at this time.
Currently, we are required to file income tax returns in the United States, California, and
the foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Our major tax jurisdictions are the United
States, California, and Hong Kong SAR. The fiscal periods that remain subject to examination by
these jurisdictions are fiscal 2002 and onward. In September 2007, we were notified by the
Franchise Tax Board that our fiscal 2004 and 2005 returns were subject to audit. The audit is
ongoing and no tax assessment has been proposed.
13. Segment, Customers, and Geographic Information
We operate in one segment: the development, marketing, and sale of interactive user interface
solutions for electronic devices and products. We generate our revenue from two broad product
categories: the PC market and digital lifestyle product markets. The PC market accounted for 85%,
85%, and 76% of our net revenue for the years ended June 30, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
The following is a summary of net revenue within geographic areas based on our customers
locations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
China |
|
$ |
141,958 |
|
|
$ |
213,862 |
|
|
$ |
235,749 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
23,558 |
|
|
|
27,587 |
|
|
|
55,575 |
|
Korea |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
38,917 |
|
Japan |
|
|
4,873 |
|
|
|
5,771 |
|
|
|
18,342 |
|
United States |
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
6,727 |
|
|
|
11,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
184,557 |
|
|
$ |
266,787 |
|
|
$ |
361,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
As of June 30, 2007 and 2008, long-lived assets within geographic areas consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
17,150 |
|
|
$ |
19,662 |
|
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,400 |
|
|
$ |
22,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our goodwill of $1.9 million, is primarily related to the United States.
Major customers as a percentage of net revenue were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
Customer A |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Customer B |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Customer C |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
Customer D |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
14. Restructuring Charge
In fiscal 2007, we incurred a restructuring charge of $915,000 in connection with the closure
of our European development center as part of our strategic efforts to realign our development
capabilities to better meet the needs of our Asia/Pacific customer base. We accounted for our
restructuring charge in accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or
Disposal Activities. Included in the restructuring charge were personnel costs, consisting of
severance and relocation of $526,000; a lease reserve of $287,000, net of estimated sublease
income; and a non-cash impairment of property and equipment of $102,000. As of June 30, 2007, all
costs associated with the restructuring were settled and no additional payment obligation exists.
15. Subsequent Events
On July 31, 2008, we announced a 3-for-2 stock split to be effected as a stock dividend. The
stock split will be effective for stockholders of record after the close of market on August 15,
2008 and will be payable on August 29, 2008. Our financial statements presented herein and the
associated footnotes reflect the retroactive effect of the 3-for-2 stock split.
In July 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to an additional $80
million of our common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions. Common stock purchased under this program is held as treasury stock. From April 2005
through June 30, 2008, we purchased 9,088,100 shares of our common stock in the open market for an
aggregate cost of $237.4 million or an average cost of $26.12 per share. The stock dividend will
not be paid on treasury shares; accordingly, the post-split quantity of common treasury shares for
each period presented is unchanged from the pre-split quantity. The timing and amount of any
future purchases will depend upon market conditions and other factors.
F-29
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation (1) |
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
(b) |
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (2) |
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (3) |
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (4) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (5) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
(b) |
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2002, between the registrant and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (2) |
|
|
|
|
4
|
(c) |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement (6) |
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
Indenture dated December 7, 2004 by and between the registrant and American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (4) |
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated December 7, 2004 by and among the registrant, Bear,
Stearns & Co. Inc., and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (4) |
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
1986 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
(a) |
|
1996 Stock Option Plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
(b) |
|
Form of grant agreements for 1996 Stock Option Plan (5) |
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
2000 U.K. Approved Sub-Plan to the 1996 Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
2000 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and form of grant agreement (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(a) |
|
Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (as amended through January 23, 2007)
(8) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(b) |
|
Form of grant agreements for Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation Plan (9) |
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
(c) |
|
Form of deferred stock award agreement for Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Compensation
Plan (10) |
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
(a) |
|
Corrected Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended through
January 23, 2007) (8) |
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
(b) |
|
2001 Employee Stock Purchase Sub-Plan for U.K. Employees (5) |
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
Subordinated Secured Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated August 12, 1997 executed by the
registrant in favor of National Semiconductor Corporation (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Federico
Faggin (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Francis
F. Lee (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
|
Form of Stock Option Grant and Stock Option Agreement between the registrant and Russell
J. Knittel (7) |
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001 between Silicon Valley Bank and
the registrant as amended through November 30, 2004 (11) |
|
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into as of January 28, 2002 with the following
directors and executive officers: Federico Faggin, Francis F. Lee, Russell J. Knittel, Shawn
P. Day, David T. McKinnon, Keith B. Geeslin, and Richard L. Sanquini; as of April 23, 2002
with W. Ronald Van Dell; as of June 26, 2004 with Jeffrey D. Buchanan; as of March 28, 2006
with Thomas J. Tiernan; as of September 25, 2006; with Hing Chung (Alex) Wong; as of February
20, 2007 with Nelson C. Chan; and as of October 23, 2007 with James L. Whims. (1) |
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
Severance Policy for Principal Executive Officers (12) |
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
Change of Control and Severance Agreement entered into by Francis F. Lee as of April 22,
2003 (12) |
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
Form of Change of Control and Severance Agreement entered into by Russell J. Knittel as of
April 22, 2003 (12) |
61
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
10.21
|
|
Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 2004 by and among the registrant, Bear, Stearns & Co.
Inc., and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC (4) |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Settlement Agreement dated March 31, 2005 by and among the registrant, Alps Electric Co.
Ltd., and Cirque Corporation (13) * |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Change of Control Severance Agreement entered into by Thomas Tiernan as of April 3, 2006 (14) |
|
|
12.1
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
21
|
|
List of Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
29, 2001, as filed with the SEC on February 21, 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 8-A as filed with the SEC on August
16, 2002. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on July 31, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on December 7, 2004. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002, as filed with the SEC on September 12, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on April 24, 2008 |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants registration statement on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-56026) as filed with the SEC January 22, 2002 and declared effective
January 28, 2002. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
29, 2007, as filed with the SEC on November 8, 2007. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
28, 2002, as filed with SEC on February 6, 2003. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
24, 2006, as filed with the SEC on September 7, 2006. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on December 3, 2004. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2003, as filed with the SEC on September 12, 2003. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on April 1, 2005. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with
the SEC on April 3, 2006. |
|
* |
|
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request that
was granted by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Exchange
Act. |
62
exv12w1
Exhibit 12.1
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Set forth below is information concerning our ratio of earnings to fixed charges on a
consolidated basis for the periods indicated. This ratio shows the extent to which our business
generates enough earnings after the payment of all expenses other than interest to make the
required interest payments on our convertible senior subordinated notes.
For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income
before income taxes and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and the portion
of rent expense we believe represents the interest component of such rent expense.
(in
thousands, expect for ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fixed charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,939 |
|
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
Portion of rent expense deemed to represent interest |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed charges |
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
$ |
1,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,201 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
$ |
2,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,992 |
|
|
$ |
37,985 |
|
|
$ |
13,701 |
|
|
$ |
26,534 |
|
|
$ |
31,100 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
7,934 |
|
|
|
20,347 |
|
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
17,688 |
|
Fixed charges |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
2,201 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
2,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings for computation of ratio |
|
$ |
21,418 |
|
|
$ |
59,869 |
|
|
$ |
27,724 |
|
|
$ |
40,725 |
|
|
$ |
50,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
exv21
Exhibit 21
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
STATE OR JURISDICION |
NAME |
|
OF ORGANIZATION |
Synaptics International, Inc.
|
|
California |
|
|
|
Synaptics (UK) Limited
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
|
Synaptics Hong Kong Limited
|
|
Hong Kong |
|
|
|
Synaptics Europe Sarl
|
|
Switzerland |
|
|
|
Synaptics Holding GmbH
|
|
Switzerland |
|
|
|
Synaptics LLC
|
|
Delaware |
exv23w1
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Synaptics Incorporated:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-81820,
333-82288, 333-82286, 333-82282, 333-99531, 333-146145 and 333-146146) on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 333-115274 on Form S-4, and Registration Statement No. 333-122348 on Form S-3 of
Synaptics Incorporated of our reports dated August 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Synaptics Incorporated and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2007 and June 28, 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 28, 2008 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 28, 2008, which reports
appear in the June 28, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Synaptics Incorporated. Our report dated
August 27, 2008 includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, at the beginning of fiscal 2008.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Mountain View, California
August 27, 2008
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Francis F. Lee, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synaptics Incorporated; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Francis F. Lee
|
|
|
Francis F. Lee |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
I, Russell J. Knittel, certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Synaptics Incorporated; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 27, 2008 |
/s/ Russell J. Knittel
|
|
|
Russell J. Knittel |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synaptics Incorporated (the Company)
for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Francis F. Lee, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis F. Lee
|
|
|
Francis F. Lee |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer August 27, 2008 |
|
exv32w2
Exhibit 32.2
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synaptics Incorporated (the Company)
for the year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Russell J. Knittel, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief
Administrative Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
(1) |
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|
|
(2) |
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Russell J. Knittel
|
|
|
Russell J. Knittel |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer August 27, 2008 |
|
|